Skip to main content

1-20 of 149 results for subject:Migration

Legislation X
European Union Bill 2010-12

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

European Union Bill 2010-12 (149)
More

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My right hon. Friend presumed earlier that the Lords had inserted the amendments to protect parliamentary sovereignty. Is it not possible that some noble Lords may have voted to insert the amendments because, in the circumstances outlined by the hon. Member for Luton North (Kelvin Hopkins), if 39% of people...

Member
Mark Reckless (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c67
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has put matters on the record. I am content to take the arguments and reasons given by Members of the House of Lords as justification for the amendments in which they believed.

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c67
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister agree that if we accept the amendment, we are setting up a perverse incentive for the Government of the day to seek a low turnout if they wish to get a measure through? That might affect the way they publicise a referendum or engage with the process.

Member
Ian Swales (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c67
House
House of Commons

That puts it fairly. The perverse incentive to seek an apathetic reaction from the electorate is one that I would want to avoid.

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c67
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for giving way; he is being generous with his time. Does he agree that thresholds are just bliss for the lazy politician? If politicians are not sure that they are going to win and want those on the other side to prove their point, they can...

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c66-7
House
House of Commons

I am confident that if and when a British Government made a proposal to support a treaty change to give extra powers to the European Union and put that to the people, the turnout would be significantly above 40%. I have confidence in the voters.

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c66
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend puts his point well. There have been parliamentary by-elections where the total turnout was less than 40%, and I do not think anybody argued at that moment that the election of that Member was in any way invalid.

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c67
House
House of Commons

Can I clarify what the Minister is saying? Is he saying that the 40% rule would apply not only to referendums in this context but to any future referendum and that the Government would be committed to opposing any 40% threshold for any future independence referendum in Scotland?

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c66
House
House of Commons

I am not going to speculate on a hypothetical Scottish referendum. We have said clearly not just on this Bill but on the Bill that authorised the referendum on the alternative vote system that we felt the decision should be taken by those people who voted, and the outcome should...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c66
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman recall the referendums on Scottish and Welsh devolution in the late 1970s, which required a threshold which was not reached? That was a grotesque humiliation for the Labour Government and was an exultant moment of glory for the Conservatives as Mrs Thatcher swept forward to...

Member
Denis MacShane (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c66
House
House of Commons

I think the hon. Gentleman is being hypothetical and I am sure that some voters would be cussed enough to insist on going to the polls whatever the odds against them but his point is a reasonable one.

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c65
House
House of Commons

In very extreme circumstances, there could be a result of 39% to zero with the zeros winning.

Member
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c65
House
House of Commons

I assumed that I did not need to translate the figures for the right hon. Gentleman and I am sure that he understands my argument perfectly well. There could be a very small difference between the two sides in a referendum result, but it would be valid if the turnout...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c65
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is absolutely correct about the views of the Electoral Commission, which I believe it expressed publicly in its response to the amendments passed in the other place. There could be some perverse, although unintended, I am sure, effects if the threshold amendments were upheld. In some...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c65
House
House of Commons

The argument that the Minister is very fairly advancing is reinforced by what the Electoral Commission said in advance of today's proceedings. Its task and statutory duty in issuing a certificate following an election has to be based on a proper definition of the size of the electorate and what...

Member
Charles Kennedy (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c65
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. We get into very dangerous territory as elected representatives when we start to say that only votes or elections in which the turnout was above a given percentage are valid. What is at issue is our intention to provide for the British electorate to have...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c64-5
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for being so courteous in giving way. Does he agree that, ironically, elections to the European Parliament often have a turnout of 40% or less, as do many local authority elections? Would it not be absurd to consider those as merely advisory?

Member
Henry Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c64
House
House of Commons

We sought in this Bill to define a constitutional change of the sort that my hon. Friend describes in terms of a transfer of competencies or powers from the United Kingdom to the European Union. That seems to us to be a significant constitutional change and the definition is one...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c64
House
House of Commons

The principle on which the Government have consistently sought to act in preparing and introducing this legislation has been that a change to the treaties that transferred new competencies or powers from the United Kingdom to the institutions of the European Union would require the agreement of the British people...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c64
House
House of Commons

Let me have one last shot. Does the Minister concede that there is a world of difference between the members of the coalition Government having entered into an agreement between themselves for purposes that suit them and the constitutional convention that a referendum is required when there is a fundamental...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
531 c64
House
House of Commons