Skip to main content

1-20 of 367 results for subject:Protection

Legislation X
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06 (367)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way again. On my understanding of the Bill, if one were out shopping and someone tried to steal something while one was in a covered shopping mall, using greater force would be justified because it is a building, but it would...

Member
Lord Austin of Dudley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c530
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right: the Oklahoma law has nothing to do with the musical of the same name; it has been named after Mr. Clint Eastwood’s famous line—““Make my day, punk””—from the motion picture ““Dirty Harry””. Under the ““Make my day”” law, in effect, anyone who dares to enter...

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c531-2
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend reflect on the appalling situation whereby homeowners in the US are being attacked and shot with their own weapons? In some instances, the burglar has broken in and the homeowner has produced their gun, only for the burglar to grab it and shoot the homeowner. I...

Member
Lord Austin of Dudley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c532
House
House of Commons

The delay in my rising is the consequence of my just having come to terms with the implications of this draconian and absurd Bill. Will my hon. Friend confirm that in discussing the Oklahoma law, he will talk about the number of people who have been shot dead as a...

Member
Lord Khan of Tooting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c531
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a good point and I can add nothing to it. I was not planning to raise that issue so I am grateful to him for doing so. Lord Morris went on to say:"““If there is some relatively minor attack it would not be common sense to...

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c533
House
House of Commons

Does not that illustrate the point I made earlier? Although we have to accept that members of the public feel that the current law has grey areas, the Bill would only move us to a new grey area, with new dangers and a different set of circumstances under which people...

Member
Nick Palmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c533
House
House of Commons

In fact, I think that the film was ““Sudden Impact””, rather than ““Dirty Harry””. However, we have the right actor, even if I named the wrong movie and got the quote wrong; the Oklahoma law is certainly known as the ““Make my day”” law. Perhaps we can move out of...

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c532
House
House of Commons

I am glad that my hon. Friend mentioned the common law defence. He will be aware that ““Archbold”” also suggests that section 3 would not cover all cases of defence of the person, noting that if a person was attacked by someone who was insane, so as not to be...

Member
Lord Khan of Tooting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c532-3
House
House of Commons

Who was shot in the buttocks.

Member
Lord Khan of Tooting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c533
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. There would still be a grey area because we would still be arguing about what was or was not excessive force, but there would be a further grey area, perhaps tinged with red blood, in that the issues with which we would be dealing would...

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c533
House
House of Commons

Conservative Members have made great play of the fact that the Bill would act as a deterrent, yet the only evidence they have been able to produce was given by one convicted burglar.

Member
Janet Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c533
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend. Perhaps we shall all get a surprise this morning and find that the Government are willing to support my reasonable proposals. The Tony Martin case captured public imagination. Regrettably, however, a threshold was crossed and the burglar was fleeing the building, possibly not...

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c500-1
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. If we examine some of the cases, we see a different picture emerging. As we have no definition of ““grossly disproportionate””, perhaps we should consider some of the cases that have come before the courts and test them against the existing definition and against...

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c565
House
House of Commons

I am sure my hon. Friend is aware that the leaflet to which he referred, the joint statement from the CPS and ACPO, makes it clear that householders do not have to wait to be attacked before they can take action. It states:"““. . . if you are in your...

Member
Janet Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c536-7
House
House of Commons

One point that has not been explored in detail yet is that the Bill states that even grossly disproportionate force can be used if the person using that force was not aware that it was grossly disproportionate. Does that not open an enormous grey area, which is not present in...

Member
Nick Palmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c537-8
House
House of Commons

To be fair to the Opposition, those gangs would not be able to go out and do that. They would only be able to do so in a building.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c555
House
House of Commons

That allays the minor concern that I had, and I can now confidently, positively and happily support my hon. Friend’s stance.

Member
Lord Khan of Tooting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c540
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend accept that many burglars commit burglaries to fuel a drug habit? If a burglar is high on an illegal substance, the last thing they will do is sit down and analyse whether there is a deterrent, be it a baseball bat or whatever. They will commit...

Member
Robert Flello (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c528
House
House of Commons

The proposed new subsection reads:"““Where a person uses force””." Will my hon. Friend enlighten us about what would happen if someone set a dog upon a supposed intruder? The dog would be using the force, but the person would have some control over the dog—or would they be held not...

Member
Jim Dowd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c547
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right to raise that. I was construing the phrase ““grossly disproportionate”” jointly, but one can consider it disjunctively as well, which creates two questions. As far as I am aware, there is no guidance in the common law, and there is certainly none in the...

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 December 2005
Reference
440 c546
House
House of Commons