Skip to main content

1-20 of 205 results for subject:Protection

Legislation X
Geneva Conventions Act 1957

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Geneva Conventions Act 1957 (205)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Although it would not create a difficulty for a ship to fly the three flags at once, if the example given by my hon. Friend the Member for East Devon (Mr. Swire) were followed in respect of a vehicle and it had to carry the three emblems, they might have...

Member
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c960
House
House of Commons

As ever, my hon. Friend brings fresh insight to the debate. In that interesting intervention, she reminds the whole House of Proust, who argued that the dilution of symbols robs them of meaning. It is important to appreciate that the cross is not only widely accepted and easily recognised but...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c969
House
House of Commons

That is an extremely important point, and the hon. Gentleman is quite right. The Bill is unlikely to have an impact on UK soil, but it will send a very clear message to other nations.

Member
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c929
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way. His last point encapsulated the core of what I was seeking to say to the House earlier—that where someone deliberately uses the symbol and the name to masquerade as a humanitarian unit and then opens fire, perhaps on other people...

Member
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c965
House
House of Commons

I shall be more charitable than my hon. Friend to the Government, because I think that there is a desire and a mood in all parties to provide the necessary protection to men and women operating in the field under the red cross and the red crescent. However, my hon....

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c944
House
House of Commons

It is true that the protocol has to be applied through domestic criminal law, and that we are not able to track whether there have been prosecutions of people who have attacked UN personnel. However, the protocol is designed to correct the weakness in coverage that does reflect the current...

Member
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c929-30
House
House of Commons

Before my hon. Friend moves on to that point, can he give me some assurance that the red shield of David, which was specifically outlawed following the 1949 diplomatic conference, will not be brought back into the equation?

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c934
House
House of Commons

Conversely, the wounded on board a hospital ship could come from a variety of religious backgrounds, and there might be reason to fly the red cross, the red crescent and the red crystal. Does my hon. Friend understand whether anything would prevent any vessel from being marked with the three...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c960
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend may be premature in bringing his opening remarks to a conclusion before he has addressed concerns about organisations using the red cross in a way that diminishes its value—that is, organisations not connected with bringing aid to the third world and war-torn parts of the world.

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c966
House
House of Commons

My enthusiasm is purely for my hon. Friend's line of argument.

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c963
House
House of Commons

Geneva Conventions and United Nations Personnel (Protocols) Bill (HL). Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on proceedings in Committee, on Report, Third reading and any other proceedings. Agreed to on division (452 votes to 16).

Lead member
Baroness Merron
Answering member
David Lidington
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c924-85
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way on that point?

Member
Michael Fabricant (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c972
House
House of Commons

Who will determine the circumstances in which the red crystal, as distinct from either alternative, will be used?

Member
John Bercow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c926
House
House of Commons

Of course, I am very happy to do so. Such work helps us all, of course, and we should be proud of and grateful for it. I very much welcome the sentiments expressed in early-day motion 1224, which was tabled this week by my hon. Friend the Member for Chorley...

Member
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c925-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time. The Bill will give effect to two international agreements. The aim of both is to protect those who help others caught up in conflict—those who risk their lives to provide humanitarian support to others. The enactment of...

Member
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c924
House
House of Commons

It is my understanding that the emblems can be used alone or in combination, which could lead to an extraordinary range of approaches in different countries. Is that likely to be confusing?

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c979
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that it would be unfair to point out not only that few Labour Members have spoken—[Hon. Members: ““None!””]—but that Labour Back Benchers have been entirely absent from the debate? Would it be unfair to put that on the record, or shall I do so?

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c977
House
House of Commons

I hope that the Minister will respond to that question. When I examined the detail, it was apparent to me that as soon as the Bill was passed the Government could ratify the protocol, and that under the terms of the protocol the measure would come into effect six months...

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c977
House
House of Commons

I wonder whether my hon. Friend agrees that we must look for every opportunity to allow Labour Members of Parliament to engage in Parliament, especially given the fact that the Leader of the House has said that 5 per cent. of Labour Members are ““bone idle””.

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c978
House
House of Commons

I do not think that putting the truth on the record can ever be regarded as unfair. My hon. Friend has effectively criticised me for being unduly generous to Government Back Benchers by failing to draw attention to the fact that none are present, let alone participating in the debate....

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
490 c977-8
House
House of Commons