Skip to main content

1-20 of 595 results for subject:Enforcement

Legislation X
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06 (595)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
CHAP 16 2006

The Minister mentioned that the compulsory purchase powers did not need to be included in the Bill. Is that because he can access those powers through other legislation, or because he does not envisage compulsory purchase by the agency involved?

Member
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c936
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment (a) to the Lords amendment.

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c944
House
House of Commons

I, too, would be interested to hear the Minister’s reply to the points raised by the hon. Member for South-East Cambridgeshire (Mr. Paice). Generally, we support these amendments, which we find helpful, but I wonder whether they will cover the thousands of sites and notices already in existence before the...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c943
House
House of Commons

: I am also happy to support the amendments, with which we broadly agree. There is a contrast between the provisions for the inspectors’ powers and the Government’s previous stubbornness on what is now the Animal Welfare Act. They resisted the cause of my hon. Friend the Member for Lewes...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c941
House
House of Commons

Just to assist the hon. Gentleman and others, we have put some guidance on this in the Library to help people to interpret what is, I agree, extremely complicated legislation.

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c940
House
House of Commons

During Lords Committee, we were asked to consider whether any guidance that is published by the Secretary of State should be published ““contemporaneously”” with the issuing of it. We could not accept that wording, but could not argue with the principle. We believe that there should be a degree of...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c938-9
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for his comments and we mostly welcome this group of amendments. The Minister, and other hon. Members who have taken an interest in this part of the Bill, will know that it has probably caused the most angst, especially the issue of the date...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c960-1
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister agree that the designation of the Yorkshire Dales national park also ought to include a good youth hostel? Will he consider giving some assistance to the youth hostels in the Yorkshire dales that are about to close?

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c950
House
House of Commons

Before I speak to the first group of amendments, I would like to thank peers in the other place, particularly Baronesses Byford and Miller and my colleague, Lord Bach, for their hard work on the Bill since it left the House. They have continued to take a constructive and collaborative...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c935-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c935
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to correct me. I hope that we can prevail on Ministers to do as he suggests. The amendments show clear proportionality in examining the code of practice, which we greatly welcome, and limiting the ground for entry to property to search for proscribed pesticides in...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c941
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for saying that he has put the guidance in the Library. I hope that he will put it elsewhere as well; otherwise it will not be much use to most people. I understand and appreciate his point, but it does not detract from my...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c941
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister deal with the point about the appeal that has been lodged? Why do we need to have legislation now, before the appeal has been dealt with?

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c951
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right that we need clear guidance. I shall not pursue my amendment but we have raised the matter and the Under-Secretary has put his position on it on record. We welcome the group of amendments, which has taken us a long way from where we started....

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c963-4
House
House of Commons

Liberal Democrat Members also support the amendments—consensus is clearly breaking out—and I join the Minister and the hon. Member for South-East Cambridgeshire (Mr. Paice) in stating that the Lords have done an excellent job. Lords amendment No. 1 is particularly welcome, because it brings consultation with local communities into the...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c937-8
House
House of Commons

The powers have never been used by the Countryside Agency. We have been convinced that it is not necessary for Natural England to take them forward. Amendment No. 19 and the consequential amendments Nos. 34 and 64 add national park authorities to the list of authorities eligible for financial support...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c936
House
House of Commons

I endorse the Minister’s remarks about the work done in the other place. That is a first class example of the value of the other House, and the knowledge and diligence that peers apply to our legislative process. The Bill is considerably improved since it left this place, largely through...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c936-7
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, I should like to respond as best I can to the points that hon. Members have raised. In response to the question from the hon. Member for South-East Cambridgeshire (Mr. Paice), the use of the word ““failure”” is technically right. If a conservation body...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c943-4
House
House of Commons

When the Minister talks about cartographical discrepancies, I hope to God that he is not talking about the Rural Payments Agency; otherwise there would be so many denotifications and renotifications that we would be here for ever. That organisation seems to be completely incapable of getting its digital mapping correct....

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2006
Reference
444 c942-3
House
House of Commons