Skip to main content

1-20 of 153 results for subject:Functions

Member X
Baroness Andrews

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Andrews, Baroness (153)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is a bit daunting for any Minister to be told that nothing they could say could possibly change a noble Lord’s mind or make any impression on it whatever, but I shall try.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c269GC
House
House of Lords

Again, let me offer some assurances. It is up to local authorities. There is no reason why they should change their constitution at all; they will not be required to. The powers that cover road charging are essentially inherited. There is no way that the combined authorities will introduce congestion...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c274-5GC
House
House of Lords

I will have a go. I am grateful to my noble friend for his encouragement. The noble Lord raises a very important point, and I am happy to try to reassure him and to ensure that the Committee knows that both parts of the Bill are not merely compatible but...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c269-71GC
House
House of Lords

I can reassure the noble Lord about that. It definitely could happen because only part of the function relating to housing could be taken away. If those local authorities forming an EPB thought it relevant and important, there is no reason at all why the housing authorities should not retain...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c265GC
House
House of Lords

I hope noble Lords will not have withdrawal symptoms after today, since I sincerely hope we will finish this afternoon. I am grateful for the amendments in this group because they allow me to clarify issues that have been raised and to reassure noble Lords. The amendments tabled by the...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c261-5GC
House
House of Lords

I hope that I can put the noble Lord’s mind at rest in response to his concerns. We have reached Clause 116 and there is a sort of warmth creeping around the Committee. We are not now accused of doing damage, so there is a conditional welcome. Terrific. MMAs are...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c281-6GC
House
House of Lords

I am happy to have this opportunity to put the noble Lord’s mind at rest about the issues he raised about ITAs and the notion of the combined authorities. He clearly intends his amendment to probe the Government on this matter because its effect would be to prevent combined authorities...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c273-4GC
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords have been extremely generous, and I will certainly pass on the thanks of both noble Lords for the exceptional work of the policy officials and the lawyers. Noble Lords will appreciate that it was quite a challenge to look at the legislation and to make sense of it...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c303-4GC
House
House of Lords

I shall reply to that point. My excursion into socialism and/or Methodism is prompted by the fact that I feel demob happy because my noble friend Lord Brett is taking the next three groups of amendments to the last part of the Bill. I am glad that he is doing...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c288GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we took another amendment before turning to the Statement because we thought that we had better ensure that the Prime Minister was not on his feet. We thought that we had a short technical amendment. I shall answer the noble Baroness as briefly and as concisely as possible....

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
695 c863-4
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 3: 3: Clause 38, page 22, line 5, leave out paragraph (b) On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 40 [Resolution for elections by thirds: requirements]:

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
695 c864
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the support of the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, because I shall have to say some of the things that I have said at previous stages. However, I shall also try to make it clear that the amendment would have very serious effects, along the...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
695 c857-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the course of debates in both Houses one sometimes wishes one could have been as clear at the beginning of the process as one is at the end. I hope that we are all now clear. I ask the noble Baroness to withdraw the amendment.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
695 c859
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 2: 2: Clause 33, page 19, line 37, leave out paragraph (b) The noble Baroness said: My Lords, this group of amendments tidies up the Bill following your Lordships’ decision to remove the elected executive model from the Bill. We are of course disappointed that noble Lords...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
695 c862
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 4: 4: Clause 40, page 22, line 38, leave out paragraph (b) On Question, amendment agreed to.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
695 c864
House
House of Lords

Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill. Lords third reading debate. Part 1 of 2 records.

Lead member
Baroness Andrews
Answering member
Baroness Hanham
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
695 c856-64
House
House of Lords

Greater London Authority Bill. Commons reasons considered. Commons reasons for disagreeing to Lords amendments agreed to.

Lead member
Baroness Andrews
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
695 c651-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 1 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 1A. It was the overwhelming view of the other place that it would be wrong to impose term limits on the office of...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
695 c651
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Motion B, That this House do not insist on its Amendment No. 2 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 2A. The other place again made clear its strong opposition to this amendment. It cuts across the fundamental principle of the...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
695 c653-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons reasons be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. [The page and line references are to HL Bill 46, the Bill as first printed for the Lords.] 1: Before Clause 3, insert the following new Clause- ““Mayor: limit...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
695 c651
House
House of Lords