Skip to main content

1-20 of 33 results for subject:Hacking

Member X
Baroness Anelay of St Johns

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Anelay of St Johns, Baroness (33)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anelay of St Johns on 5 November 2015 (HL2969), whether the government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s hacking of Sony Pictures Entertainment, as verified by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation in December 2014, posed...

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 June 2016
Reference
HL540
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government when information systems at FCO Services were last independently penetration tested.

Asked by
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 June 2015
Reference
HL458
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 180 not moved.] [Amendment No. 181 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.] Clause 43 agreed to.

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c622
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for that sympathetic reply and I think that progress is being made here. I am also grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Hylton, for his support. He is absolutely right to point out that, when we talk about offences in these terms, we are...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c622
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 185A: Page 36, line 12, at end insert- ““( ) Nothing in this section shall authorise the disclosure of documents or information subject to legal privilege.”” The noble Baroness said: I rise briefly to movethis amendment only because it was originally not grouped with Amendment No. 185...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c622-3
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 179: After Clause 42, insert the following new clause- ““ENCRYPTED DATA AND INDECENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF A CHILD (1) The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c. 23) is amended as follows. (2) In section 53 (failure to comply with a notice)- (a) after paragraph (a) of subsection...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c617-20
House
House of Lords

After that comprehensive reply, it would be churlish to do other than say that I will make sure that the Law Society of Scotland has a good look at this. I agree withthe noble Lord that, with regard to the third interpretation of the potential consequences, it would be wrong...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c625
House
House of Lords

I added my name in support of Amendment No. 193. The noble Baroness, Lady Henig, has neatly returned us, at the end of day four in Committee, to the concerns underlying all the debates that we had on that first day in Committee when we looked at the number of...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c691-2
House
House of Lords

I teased the noble Baroness because it is the Government, in their early release schemes, who are releasing from prison those who should be there. We can see the difficulties arising from those with life sentences who have been lost after release by the probation service. However, we will return...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c687-8
House
House of Lords

Let us hope they have the relevant advice and the good sense to do that where it is right to do so. We are on the same side, but for some people, it is much better if the thing is disposed of properly. All of us want the proper protections...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c688
House
House of Lords

moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 191B, Amendment No. 191C: Leave out lines 25 to 29 and insert- ““““live link”” means an arrangement by which- (a) a person, when not in the place where the hearing is being held, is able to see and hear, and to be seen...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c680-4
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 173: Page 32, line 13, after ““person”” insert ““aged 18 years or over”” The noble Baroness said: I wish to speak to Amendments Nos. 173, 175 and 177. These are probing amendments that reflect concerns raised by the All-Party Children’s Group in its child impact statement. Clause...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c608
House
House of Lords

As I made clear, this is a probing amendment to meet the requirements of the all-party group, to which the noble Lord’s comments will not come as a surprise. The difficulty is that all of us have noted the Government’s split personality. On some occasions 16 to 18 year-olds are...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c609
House
House of Lords

I add my voice in support of the amendment. The noble Baroness, Lady Henig, has made a very practical proposal. These people have very broad experience of police matters through their service on police authorities. It would bring an extra dimension to inspections, without in any way undermining their independence...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c598-9
House
House of Lords

I support the amendments tabled by the noble Baronesses, Lady Henig and Lady Harris of Richmond. I share their concern about the order-making power in Clause 29. I referred to it very briefly last week when we debated the large group of amendments in the name ofthe noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
684 c595-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was intrigued that my noble friend seemed able to find a new way of trying to alter the Title of a Bill as I was aware that one was unable, by ordinary amendments, to change the Title itself. The noble Lord has delivered an opportunity to the Government to...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
678 c97
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the intentions behind the noble Lord’s amendment, although I do not support the way in which he is going about it. I certainly agree with him that it is important that there is clarity in the Bill with regard to proportionality. Here, we are trying to get at the...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
678 c18-9
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 74A:"Page 21, line 17, at end insert—" ““(   )   The Secretary of State must not process sensitive personal data within the meaning of the Data Protection Act 1998 (c. 29) in connection with an individual’s entry in the Register without the consent of that individual.”” The noble Baroness said: My Lords, the amendment seeks clarification...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
678 c20-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister. As I explained, this was for clarification. Most people who have not been involved with every line and word of this Bill would have thought a photograph could not bring offence by bearing sensitive personal data, but people have written to me who are...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
678 c22
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 98:"Page 25, line 43, after first ““he”” insert ““knowingly or recklessly””" The noble Baroness said: My Lords, my noble friend’s Amendment No. 100, to leave out Clause 31, is grouped with my amendment. I look forward to hearing from him and I suspect that he will have some trenchant questions to ask the Minister...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2006
Reference
678 c62
House
House of Lords