Skip to main content

1-20 of 273 results for subject:Procurement

Member X
Lord Bach

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Bach, Lord (273)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I shall not speak about the advantages or disadvantages of a GOCO; I remain fairly neutral on the issue. I have listened with great interest to the very good speeches that we have heard so far on this clause stand part debate started by my noble friend Lord...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
752 cc18-9GC
House
House of Lords

My point is that an affirmative resolution does not really provide any effective stop for Parliament, not that it does so. Given my experience of affirmative orders that have been fatally objected against, I wonder how the noble Lord can say that an affirmative order that is defeated really changes...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
752 c23GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, not for the first time the House owes a debt of gratitude to the noble Baroness, Lady Deech. By securing this important debate, she has not only obliged the Government to defend their past conduct and current proposals in Parliament, something that I suspect they are not overkeen...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2013
Reference
747 cc473-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, do the Government believe in the concept of a defence industrial policy? It seems to some of us that in reality this plan may mean that within a fairly short time we will be buying off the shelf from anywhere, at the expense of—and with no regard for—the...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2012
Reference
739 c117
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord should not insult my noble friend Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, but he is not the first to do so.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2012
Reference
739 c118
House
House of Lords

I will certainly withdraw my amendment, and I thank the Minister for his very full reply. Speaking for myself, I have to say that I remain entirely dissatisfied by his speech about this very important part of the Bill. I will be as quick as I possibly can be because...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1771
House
House of Lords

We spent quite a lot of money on it, and planned to spend more. I think that that is as far as we can take it tonight, but if the noble Lord can supply the figures, if there are any, that would be helpful to the Committee. I want to...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1758
House
House of Lords

I am not concerned about that tonight, but the position is not clear yet and we need to be clear. The real problem is the mandatory nature of this provision, which is what worries us. It is not the fact that there will be telephone advice. Such advice is excellent....

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1772
House
House of Lords

4: Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert— ““( ) The Lord Chancellor must ensure that a person eligible for legal aid advice is able to access it in a range of forms ab initio, including securing the provision of initial face-to-face advice.””

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1759
House
House of Lords

As the noble Lord says, there is everything to play for—rather like this Bill, I hope. At the risk of taking up too much time, I will just quote from the speech of Lucy Scott-Moncrieff, the vice-president of the Law Society this year, who I am sure will be a...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1758
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we come on now to an important element of Part 1 of the Bill, which is the mandatory gateway. Although I am sure the Committee knows this very well, I just remind noble Lords that if the relevant area of law is out of scope, there will be...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1759-61
House
House of Lords

That is what I mean—in case there is any misunderstanding about it. I can see how that could be misinterpreted. As the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, said, with his Amendment 2, to which he spoke along with his later amendments, Amendments 29 and 78, we get down to...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1727-8
House
House of Lords

I agree with the noble Lord and I shall say a little word about that before I sit down. Admirable work has been done in the First-tier Tribunal to make it as friendly as one can. However, it is impossible—and the Minister has heard this from around the Committee today—to...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1728-9
House
House of Lords

In my legal career and otherwise, I have always given way to better phrases used by Welsh lawyers and certainly by the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, and I do on this occasion too. Access to justice is rather important because you cannot win if you do not have...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1729-30
House
House of Lords

3: Clause 1, page 2, line 1, leave out ““may”” and insert ““must””

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1750
House
House of Lords

I will withdraw the amendment in due course, although I must say that having had the support that I have had around the House I am sorely tempted to have our first vote on this Bill tonight. But as I think that we are probably the only part of the...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment, short though it is, is important because it allows the Committee to question the Minister and to have a discussion around public legal education. That subject does not appear much in the Bill and we thought it worth tabling a probing amendment. If the Minister is...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1750-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the Committee for not being present during the first, very important debate. I hope that I informed the principal players in that debate that I would not be here for personal reasons —I had to go to a funeral of a dear friend. I am...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1727
House
House of Lords

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Shahid Malik) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. The Legal Services Commission (LSC) has today published a consultation on best value tendering (BVT) of criminal legal aid services. This follows an initial LSC consultation published in December 2007 which set out...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c63WS
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:What action the Foreign and Commonwealth Office is taking to implement the public sector food procurement initiative in respect of its purchasing of pork and bacon; what proportion of pork and bacon purchased is British; what attention is given to farm assurance, animal welfare, and health and...

Asked by
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Answer received between Tuesday 9 September and Monday 15 September 2008
Date
29 September 2008
Reference
4844; 703 c396WA
House
House of Lords