Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Shetland

Member X
Earl of Caithness

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Caithness, Earl of (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, my Amendment 94E takes what my noble friend Lord Steel said a little bit further, and asks that the Electoral Commission set the question. It is quite clear that nothing the UK Government propose is going to be accepted by the Scottish Government, and nothing that the Scottish...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c1001
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for what the Minister said in reply to my amendment, which a number of noble Lords supported. I just wonder whether his mind is totally closed on the issue of allowing the Electoral Commission to set the question. A lot of us are still quite...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c1012-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support what has been said so far. The present situation, as is increasingly becoming clear, is untenable. It goes against the principle that I have been arguing all the way along. I am in agreement with the noble Lords, Lord Foulkes of Cumnock and Lord Steel of...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c939
House
House of Lords

That was not my argument. I was responding to an intervention by the noble Lord, Lord O'Neill. I did not bring up oil. That was not my intention at all, particularly with regard to the Orkney and Shetland amendments. As for Rockall, I just wanted to know what the legal...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c990
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on that point, will the Minister confirm that my noble friend the Duke of Montrose was right to say that we cannot amend a Section 30 order here and that we have to either reject or accept it?

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c958
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not anticipate a police station—

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c978
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have put my name to the amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, and my noble friend Lord Forsyth. As my noble friend Lord Forsyth has just said, these amendments went down last year, long before the UK Government sent out their consultation paper, let alone...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c976-8
House
House of Lords

In fact, I do not anticipate people living there. But what is important are the oil exploration rights around Rockall, which have huge implications. What I want to ask my noble and learned friend is what takes preference. Is it Her Majesty's instructions to raise a union flag and it...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c979
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether my noble and learned friend can help me with the parliamentary procedure. We are discussing the referendums this afternoon. When are they going to be dealt with on Report? As my noble friend Lord Forsyth has just said, they were delayed at this stage. Is it likely...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
736 c921
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the availability & response of Search & Rescue Services in the Shetland in the recent incidents involving klondykers, in particular in 'Lunohods 1' on 9 November and 'Borodinskye Poyle' on 15 November.

Asked by
Lord Gainford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 1993
Reference
550 c136WA
House
House of Lords

What further developments have taken place on tanker routing following the consultations on the UK proposals submitted to the IMO. - Inc fact that HMG is placing copies of amended proposals in Library of the House.

Asked by
Lord Gainford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 May 1993
Reference
545 c83WA
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on further progress made with regard to interim measures following the MV "Braer" incident. - Inc fact that a paper was submitted to Sec General of the International Maritime Organisation yesterday for consideration at Maritime Safety Committee meeting in May (copies in Library - Dep 8928).

Asked by
Lord Westbury (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 February 1993
Reference
543 c20-1WA
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on outcome of joint meeting of Transport & Environment Ministers in Brussels on 25 January. - Inc fact that full text of Council conclusions will be placed in Library.

Asked by
Lord Lyell (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 1993
Reference
541 c98WA
House
House of Lords