Skip to main content

1-20 of 37 results for subject:Clubs

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (37)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I tried to take a very neutral position when I originally moved my amendment. However, it should be made absolutely clear whether the Attorney-General could ever be influenced by a political position taken by a Government in any decision that he or she might take, in any circumstances.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2011
Reference
729 c958-9
House
House of Lords

This is the third time that I have risen on these issues in the past month. Perhaps I may repeat a couple of sentences from the letter of the Conservative leader of Westminster City Council, so that those in the House who do not know what he said in it...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2011
Reference
729 c921
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to press the noble Lord—

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2011
Reference
729 c958
House
House of Lords

Should the noble Baroness not be asking whether the Attorney-General might ever in any circumstances have in mind a political position taken by the Government in determining his or her decision?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2011
Reference
729 c956
House
House of Lords

I understand that the ministry has met the council leader, but in his letter he says that the Government’s proposal will not work. He says that it will not fulfil the objectives set by the Government. I cannot imagine what has happened in the conversation with committees and officers of...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2011
Reference
729 c930
House
House of Lords

Suppose that there is a big demonstration in London with a couple of thousand people on Whitehall all marching down towards Parliament Square carrying sleeping bags. Suppose that it looks to a police officer that they may well want to spend the night somewhere in the vicinity of Parliament. It...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c975
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intervene with another rather silly and naive question. I ask these questions because previously sometimes the most ludicrous things have happened and we find an article in the Evening Standard about action taken during one of these demonstrations which none of us comprehends. I want to ask...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c979-80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had a fascinating debate. It is nearly 10 o’clock and I have not eaten yet, as indeed will be the case for most noble Lords. We have a lot to reflect on before the Report stage, as indeed will many organisations outside this House which have...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c1028
House
House of Lords

245: Clause 154, page 102, line 19, leave out from ““applies”” to end of line 20 and insert— ““(a) a justice of the peace shall apply to the Director of Public Prosecutions for advice on the advisability of granting the warrant or summons, (b) no warrant or summons shall be...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c1003
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall intervene for a few moments. We are often told that scrutiny in the Lords is better than that in the Commons, but this is a section of the Bill that I would have liked to have talked on, under a number of amendments, and due to...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c971
House
House of Lords

Can I check on a technical point with the noble Baroness? Clause 148(5) states: "““The notice must specify… the kind of amplified noise equipment to which the authorisation applies””." Does that mean that there will be a control on equipment in terms of the channel output of the equipment being...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c987
House
House of Lords

I have a further question. Sometimes when we come in by St Stephen’s Entrance, 200 or 300 people might be meeting on the other side of the road where there is a space. Someone with a loudhailer will be standing there. What control on them will exist? Will they be...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c987
House
House of Lords

I did not refer to Palace Gates.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c988
House
House of Lords

I am very sympathetic to the amendment because I feel quite strongly, and always have done, that people should be allowed to demonstrate in the square. This is a perfectly reasonable way of dealing with the difficulties that arise. Basically, you are simply clearing the square in the evening after...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c990
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I deal with my amendment in detail, I want to say a few words by way of preamble. I am not a lawyer and I cannot claim any knowledge of the background to the administration of justice in the courts, but I am a member of the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c1003-5
House
House of Lords

As a non-lawyer, I wonder whether I can ask the noble Lord a layman’s question. What kind of considerations would the public interest considerations be in the application for a warrant in a case like this? What would the DPP have in mind?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c1014
House
House of Lords

When the noble Lord said that the DPP was totally independent, he appeared to be saying that they would not have political considerations in mind. If peace negotiations were about to take place, surely that is a political consideration. It is precisely those sorts of areas that might cause the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c1015
House
House of Lords

I—

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
728 c1014
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Baroness accept that it is extremely difficult to prove that a person is not capable in many circumstances?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2010
Reference
716 c1426
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose the amendment, which I regard more as a probing amendment at this stage, and support the review. While I would not wish to appear reactionary, I wish to comment on the practical difficulties that should be firmly considered in the review. I recall debates on these...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2010
Reference
716 c1423-4
House
House of Lords