Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.


Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill

This is the third time that I have risen on these issues in the past month. Perhaps I may repeat a couple of sentences from the letter of the Conservative leader of Westminster City Council, so that those in the House who do not know what he said in it are quite clear in their minds when they are drawn into the Division Lobby. He states: "““The council has concerns over the current wording of the bill. Our chief concern is that protesters would simply move to other parts of the square, requiring further prolonged and costly legal action. Fundamentally, we do not believe that the bill as it currently stands would deliver a solution to the problem once and for all, and we are concerned that it will be a further example of poor legislation in this sensitive area””." If that is the view of the local authority, which has responsibilities in this area, we should go back to a blank piece of paper or adopt the Marlesford amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c921 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Clubs Alcoholic drinks Anti-social behaviour Civil proceedings City of Westminster Fees and charges Greater London Drugs Exemptions Licensed premises Drunkenness Police Property transfer Parliament Square Protest Misuse Opening hours Private prosecutions Young people Reform Trespass Royal parks War crimes Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Police and crime commissioners Night-time economy
Legislation
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk