Skip to main content

1-20 of 98 results for subject:Complaints

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (98)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I congratulate my noble friend on the Front Bench on her very comprehensive canter around the course of reform, and I look forward to meeting her during the proceedings on the Bill, if at all possible. I too give a cautious welcome to aspects of the Bill. I...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc722-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have heard a very powerful case from the previous speaker. I see no reason for me to detain the House unreasonably and will speak briefly, principally to Amendment 15. My concerns in Committee centred on what I saw as the need to isolate potentially irresponsible non-commercial users...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2021
Reference
809 cc1333-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I always follow very closely the words of the noble Baroness, Lady Hussein-Ece, because she has shown great courage over a few years in a number of contributions, particularly the speech that she gave about the Lester case. However, I profoundly disagree with her.

I also listened to the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2019
Reference
797 cc878-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not a lawyer, just a mere mortal who can smell an injustice a mile off. The case of Sir Edward Heath, a case that I have raised on a number of occasions over the past few years, is riddled with injustice. The Wiltshire police and crime...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2018
Reference
792 cc251-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2018
Reference
792 c282
House
House of Lords

The Chairman of Committees refers to 30 cases. This reform slightly dilutes the current arrangements. Surely from now on it should be insufficient to say, “I wish to declare my interests as registered”. Perhaps in future when

there is some ambiguity in their position, Members should be more specific and...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c398
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the tribunal which replaces the leasehold valuation tribunal system is removing the £500 statutory limit on costs. As a consequence, will not many leaseholders now find it utterly impossible to go before a tribunal because they will be worried about what the final costs of their hearings could be?

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
749 c320
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister make it clear that brief interventions are required? Otherwise not everyone will be heard.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 c317
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Statement says:

“every carer, every member of staff will be given the opportunity to say whether they would recommend their hospital to their friends or family. This will be published … where a significant proportion of patients or staff raise serious concerns about what is happening in a...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 c327
House
House of Lords

I want to intervene briefly because we want to vote on these matters today. The amendment subtly gets to the problem at the heart of the Bill, which totally underestimates the new pressures that will build up within foundation trusts on management to change the nature of the patient body...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2012
Reference
735 c1929
House
House of Lords

So that we can have it absolutely on the record, is the noble Lord saying that a teaching hospital in central London—

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2012
Reference
735 c1906
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord explain, in very simple language that people outside can understand, what is to prevent a central London teaching hospital with an international reputation ending up taking almost half its business from overseas patients who pay by private means?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2012
Reference
735 c1906
House
House of Lords

It is a very important question.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2012
Reference
735 c1906
House
House of Lords

We all know of cases where in the real world GPs have said to their patients, ““Go private and go early. Effectively, jump the queue””. That is going on all over the country and in certain parts it is happening on a great scale. If that is the case, what...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2012
Reference
735 c1911
House
House of Lords

I object to the procedures of the House of Lords being changed by a junior Minister.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2012
Reference
735 c1913
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intervene briefly to do precisely what the noble Baroness has just done; namely, draw attention to an individual case that might influence the judgment of the Committee. In a former incarnation as a Member of Parliament, I received in my post an anonymous letter from a person...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2011
Reference
732 c51
House
House of Lords

Following up on what the noble Lord, Lord Walton, said in his intervention about professional bodies, why can we not build into consumer law a requirement on private providers to provide a contractual obligation to their private customers?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2011
Reference
732 c66
House
House of Lords

Will this cover private contractors where they provide a service to the National Health Service? What would happen in a dual provision facility whereby, let us say, half the clients were private and the other half were from the National Health Service? Would this provision apply only to those who...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2011
Reference
732 c63
House
House of Lords

I tried to take a very neutral position when I originally moved my amendment. However, it should be made absolutely clear whether the Attorney-General could ever be influenced by a political position taken by a Government in any decision that he or she might take, in any circumstances.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2011
Reference
729 c958-9
House
House of Lords

This is the third time that I have risen on these issues in the past month. Perhaps I may repeat a couple of sentences from the letter of the Conservative leader of Westminster City Council, so that those in the House who do not know what he said in it...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2011
Reference
729 c921
House
House of Lords