Skip to main content

1-20 of 25 results for subject:MRSA

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (25)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Could the Secretary of State block a quality account before it is made available to the public under Clause 7(5) on the basis that he does not want particular information to be published in that report? I understand that there will be a series of regulations requiring what information can...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c188GC
House
House of Lords

Normally I find myself supporting many of the amendments moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Barker, but I have a little difficulty with this one. I think that these reports will, in general, be boring and will not deal with the meat. Generally, reports which go before Parliament are left...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c199-200GC
House
House of Lords

Does that mean a provider may well end up criticising a commissioner in the report?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c196GC
House
House of Lords

Why should we not make it a requirement? Surely, PCTs or other local health-related organisations would be sounding boards in an area. Perhaps they might wish to qualify it, prior to submission to the Secretary of State. They might want to argue with the trust or the local provider that...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c184GC
House
House of Lords

I understand that, but the issue is the wording that goes to the Secretary of State in the account. The provider might to change something in the account prior to submission to the Secretary of State. I understand that it is made available later, but that might be too late.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c184GC
House
House of Lords

Clause 6(1) refers to each body listed publishing a document; that is, "““publish in respect of each reporting period””." Then, Clause 7(4) refers to: "““A copy of any document published””," and goes on to talk about them being ““available to the public””. Does that mean that both of these bodies...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c189-90GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl, Lord Howe, referred to hospital-acquired infections. I want to take that a step further. We all welcome the principle, but I want to put forward a scenario. What would happen in those conditions? I presume that in the regulations there will be a requirement to report on...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c162-3GC
House
House of Lords

My noble friend referred to using not the regulator but PCTs and local organisations. Does that mean that draft reports will be provided to those organisations prior to them being submitted to the Secretary of State?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c183GC
House
House of Lords

I am not a professional in this area, but a consumer of services. My noble friend referred to MRSA. I could produce data on a hospital from these accounts that would not indicate to the public what is going on. Let us take a hospital with 20 wards. One ward...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c167-8GC
House
House of Lords

It that not also a matter of policy? Surely, the Government must have a view on whether that is right. In representing the public interest in these matters, the Government must have a view about whether that information is available. Whenever I go into hospital, I would like to know...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c168GC
House
House of Lords

I think that everyone is queuing to reassure me that there will be no problems. My noble friend tells me that she believes that the accounts will contain a reference to this. The question is: will they? I seek my noble friend’s reassurance that they will be there for all...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c163GC
House
House of Lords

I am aware of the code, but a hospital may choose to hide behind the existence of the code when it is writing its report. It may not wish to volunteer the information that, despite whatever codes exist, it regularly receives reports on a lack of cleanliness in loos and...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
708 c163GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want briefly to intervene and make a suggestion. The statement on user involvement states: "““The Commission must publish a statement describing how it proposes to— (a) promote awareness among service users and carers of its functions””." In Committee, I laboured the point regarding my personal experience. I...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2008
Reference
702 c882
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to say a few words on proposed new sub subsection (1)(e) referred to by the noble Baroness, Lady Cumberlege. What I have to say arises out of a conversation I had with a provider. Paragraph (e) says, "““the need to ensure that action by the Commission...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2008
Reference
702 c873
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend did not say that it was not possible. I was seeking to find out whether it could be used as a peg for bringing legal action.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2008
Reference
702 c878
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps the noble Baroness has read something into the amendment that is not quite there. It does not say that the local authority would have one of its employees act as a person handling complaints. It simply says that a matter should be referred to a local authority....

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2008
Reference
702 c895
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend and I shall refer her remarks to the colleague with whom I have been discussing these matters. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 22 [Notice of proposals]:

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2008
Reference
702 c901
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 21: 21: Clause 16, page 8, line 16, leave out from ““for”” to end of line 21 and insert ““— (a) the prevention and control of health care associated infections; (b) the safeguarding of individuals (whether receiving health or social care or otherwise) from the risk of...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2008
Reference
702 c898-900
House
House of Lords

I had not wished to intervene at this stage and I am waiting for a later part of the Bill, but I cannot understand what the noble Earl is driving at. The criticism that I have heard from people within the care profession is that there is an insufficiently clear...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2008
Reference
701 c141GC
House
House of Lords

I listened to what the noble Baroness, Lady Masham of Ilton, said, but her argument is more about the availability of specialist foods for patients who have particular difficulties. I refer to my experience in this matter. I support this eminently sensible amendment, but there is another side to the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2008
Reference
701 c146-7GC
House
House of Lords