Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, I want to say a few words on proposed new sub subsection (1)(e) referred to by the noble Baroness, Lady Cumberlege. What I have to say arises out of a conversation I had with a provider. Paragraph (e) says, "““the need to ensure that action by the Commission in relation to health and social care services is proportionate to the risks against which it would afford safeguards and is targeted only where it is needed””." ““Where it is needed”” is the judgment of the commission. It was put to me that that might be the peg on which someone who felt they were being unreasonably targeted might want to bring legal action against the commission, which would defeat, as I understand it, the purposes of the Bill. If they were targeted and felt penalised, they would argue with the commission, ““You are acting unfairly and unreasonably””. Do the Government feel that that wording is somehow insulated from the possibility of any legal action?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c873 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Carers Agency nurses Hospitals Health services Families Human rights Disease control Employment agencies Infectious diseases General Social Care Council NHS Patients Managers Public participation Mental Health Act Commission MRSA Registration Temporary employment Regulation Social services Healthcare Commission Commission for Social Care Inspection Care Quality Commission Local involvement networks
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk