Skip to main content

1-20 of 44 results for subject:Population

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (44)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What happens if the population rises by 2.5 million and, when it is spread out as a ripple effect across the whole population, each constituency then meets the limit of 76,000 plus 5 per cent? Do we then increase the number of seats or simply increase the number of voters...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2011
Reference
725 c207
House
House of Lords

That is not the information that we are being given by Members of the other House. They are saying that the register now carries more registered people than at any other stage. Perhaps the noble Lord can ask departmental officials to check, prior to the debates tomorrow.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2011
Reference
725 c177
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not speak to Amendment 26. However, I have a question to ask the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde. The boundaries are being set on the basis of the December 2010 register. Why cannot the date be January, February or March 2011, particularly since local authorities are right...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2011
Reference
725 c175
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support my noble friend Lord Touhig on his amendment. I do not want to repeat much of the discussion that has taken place in the Chamber during this debate. I have studiously avoided, during my repeated interventions on this Bill, accusing the Government of gerrymandering, because...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2011
Reference
724 c1011-2
House
House of Lords

If you have a cap at 600 and the electorate rises in the way that my noble friend is saying, does that mean that the national quota for each constituency will then have to be changed and will also rise every five years? Is that really the Government’s position?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2011
Reference
724 c1037
House
House of Lords

Will the noble and learned Lord give way?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c743
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is emphasising the need to take greater notice of the 5 per cent or 10 per cent argument than of the issue of crossing boundaries. In the light of the debate that took place in Westminster Hall, called and supported by Liberal Democrat Members, a debate on...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c702
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may take my noble friend back to the very interesting and constructive contribution of the noble Lord, Lord Rennard. I am being very serious when I say that because what he suggested might, in some ways, influence any negotiations that take place. He placed greater emphasis on the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c704
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c703
House
House of Lords

I intervene only following the intervention of the noble Lord, Lord Rennard. I am interested in the common ground to which the noble Lord, Lord Williamson of Horton, the noble Baronesses, Lady Williams of Crosby and Lady D’Souza, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, referred last...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c707-8
House
House of Lords

Is not the distinction between us and many of these other countries that we have a first past the post system? It is critical in this discussion because you can get away with a cap system where you have proportional representation and far larger seats that are more able to...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c830
House
House of Lords

I would like to have heard in the debate more references to the distinction between targets and caps, because that is essentially what we are debating. I agree with my noble friend. I was listening to the intervention of my noble friend who moved the amendment, and the intervention of...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c822-3
House
House of Lords

I do not know whether the noble Lord popped in at this hour or a couple of hours ago, but he will find that it is the inconsistency that is worrying me. If we were to have a consistent approach on these matters, then the Boundary Commission would have, to...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c824
House
House of Lords

My noble friend has referred to an issue that I intend to raise. I do not know whether we will be going at eight o’clock or nine o’clock tomorrow morning, but we may well get to the amendment where I wish to raise that issue. I have some important information...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c823-4
House
House of Lords

I have a question for the noble Lord. The Explanatory Notes state: "““The factors are similar to the existing ones. They may consider special geographical considerations, such as the size, shape and accessibility of a constituency””." What do the words ““accessibility of a constituency”” mean to the noble Lord?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c804
House
House of Lords

I am sorry. I got the numbers wrong, but the point that I am making is very simple. It was not a cap; it was a target. That is what is wrong with this legislation. We are talking about caps and not targets. When you have targets, the Boundary Commission...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c821-2
House
House of Lords

The intervention of the noble Lord, Lord Rennard, in response to my noble friend Lord Kinnock, ignored one simple issue; the Bill introduces a cap on seats. Once you introduce a cap, there is no flexibility. Whatever responsibilities, powers and so on you give the Boundary Commission, it will always...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c820-1
House
House of Lords

I am sorry; 613. I got the number wrong.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c821
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have in the course of my contributions over recent weeks tried to bring some fairly original material to our debates to help them along. I have often drawn on statistical evidence from various organisations. However, today I do not want to do that. I want to refer...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c728-31
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for giving way. I was just looking at my notes because we had an earlier intervention on Maldon. The noble Lord, Lord Newton of Braintree, referred to Maldon. He is talking to the noble Lord, Lord Higgins, at the moment but he might wish to...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
724 c738
House
House of Lords