Skip to main content

1-20 of 35 results for subject:Walking

Member X
Lord Davies of Oldham

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Davies of Oldham, Lord (35)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I suppose I ought to congratulate the Minister on the good intentions expressed in the White Paper. After all, good intentions are better than nothing, although we all know where the path of good intentions can lead. A White Paper that is not backed by any bank directives...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2011
Reference
724 c429-30
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. Having been accused of some interesting ploys this evening On one occasion I sailed safely between the viewpoint of the Official Opposition and that of the Liberal Democrat Party and on another I accepted the argument of...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c949-51
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all Members of the Committee who have spoken to this interesting group of amendments, which has raised some important issues. Amendment A267D raises a matter of considerable principle. If we accepted the amendment, it would mean that we would not necessarily have an objective to establish...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c896-900
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord: he has struck a deal. That is all I have to say.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c917
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all Members of the Committee who have spoken in a wide-ranging debate on this group of interesting amendments. It will come as no surprise to Members of the Committee that I will reply first to the noble Duke, the Duke of Montrose. Anyone who is kind...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c910-3
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords will appreciate that I hesitate to engage in a debate in which any noble Lord can think of an establishment that is next to the coast and challenge me on how the coastal path would cope with the requirements of that economic or social enterprise. I was shying...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c916
House
House of Lords

That and related issues need to be addressed. Safety is important. As the noble Lord, Lord Greenway, identified, small working dockyards and marinas may contain heavy equipment and a great deal of activity goes on. People need to be aware of that. It may be inappropriate for a path to...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c914-5
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord will have listened with the same care that I did to the part of the debate which the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, initiated on parks and gardens. The noble Baroness, Lady Byford, identified the Committee’s views on that. A range of significant views exist on a number...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c915-6
House
House of Lords

I understand that point, of course. We have to consider the economic development of the nation and how we plan ahead. However, I am seeking within the framework of the Bill not to accept an amendment that would be too restrictive on its purposes, when our recent history indicates why...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c913-4
House
House of Lords

I hear what the noble Duke says. He knows that we have no intention of ploughing arbitrarily through people’s gardens and that that is not the legislation’s intent. However, he will also be aware that the constraints surrounding the concept of the coastal path can present real issues with regard...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c914
House
House of Lords

There is a phrase that strikes fear and dread into any Minister who has to give the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, a sensible answer that he will accept. That might test me quite a long way. Amendments A268 and A273 would remove the exception to the requirement for the margin...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c901
House
House of Lords

Relieved.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c902
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is being generous in his response to our position. I said that an order under Section 2(3A) would be "the principal means", but it is not exclusive. He is right; there may need to be other measures.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c902
House
House of Lords

I could not agree more with the noble Earl. It would destroy the whole concept of the coastal path if motorised vehicles went anywhere near it.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c952
House
House of Lords

I hope that the noble Baroness appreciates that we are talking about coastal paths, not coastal highways. I do not have a romantic notion of Gypsy caravans being hauled up and down the coastal path and parking where they wish. That will certainly not be possible if the caravans are...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c938-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to noble Lords, but of course the Secretary of State and Natural England must have regard to safety. I can just see the headlines: "New Liberal Government Opens Coastal Path—4,000 Deaths in the First Year", and no one is blameworthy because it was never suggested that safety...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c936-8
House
House of Lords

At least this time I will avoid the charge from the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, that the Government take joy from being in the middle. On this occasion, the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, has expressed the Government’s view, and I am merely going to endorse the sentiments that he expressed,...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c942
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Government are encouraged by the response to VisitBritain’s campaigns. The noble Lord is right that there are benefits. Visitors from abroad bring resources in, and areas also see economic growth from internal tourism from the rest of the UK. There is also benefit from improving the health of the nation in the healthy activities involved in this tourism, as the noble Lord identified.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 January 2007
Reference
688 c1000
House
House of Lords
My Lords, outdoor recreation forms a significant part of the UK tourism industry, generating £3.5 billion a year from walking, cycling and related activities, including overnight stays. Since 2003, the Government have invested £750,000 in promoting activity tourism through VisitBritain’s outdoor England marketing campaigns.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 January 2007
Reference
688 c1000
House
House of Lords
My Lords, my impression is that it is not Governments that keep footpaths open. Governments can commit the countryside to be available to the nation, as we did with the right to roam in the Act that we passed a few years ago. It is the voluntary activity and insistence of meritorious organisations such as the Ramblers Association that keeps footpaths open and available to the public.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 January 2007
Reference
688 c1001
House
House of Lords