Skip to main content

1-20 of 526 results for subject:Iraq

Member X
Lord Hain

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hain, Lord (526)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, does the Minister agree that, as a result of this reckless unilateralist act by President Trump, Iranian and Russian influence in the region is likely to increase—and what does that do for British influence?

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2020
Reference
801 c57
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in welcoming the Minister’s insistence that only political negotiations will end this disaster of almost biblical proportions, I ask for some recognition that western foreign policy has in large part been responsible for this disaster. Why? Because we insisted at the very beginning on imposing a precondition that...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 c2042
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in welcoming the building of a Sunni local police force in Ramadi, I press the Minister to engage with the Sunni powers in the region, especially Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and others, to ensure that Sunni soldiers are available to fight Daesh on the ground. Clearly, as...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2015
Reference
767 c2146
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether any UK personnel deployed on Operation Telic have reported any ill effects due to exposure to legacy chemical weapons and made any claims for compensation due to exposure, whether real or perceived, to chemical weapons.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 November 2014
Reference
212182
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many UK personnel were involved in the destruction of Borak chemical rockets in 2006.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2014
Reference
212183
House
House of Commons

As a former Minister with responsibility for the middle east, may I express my disappointment at the Foreign Secretary’s failure to answer the pertinent questions put by the shadow Foreign Secretary? In particular, does not the situation around Kobane symbolise the complete failure of this Government’s policy towards dealing with...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2014
Reference
586 c476
House
House of Commons

I support the Prime Minister’s motion. I also think that, in the end, we will have to deal with ISIL in Syria as well. Did I hear him correctly a moment or two ago? Did he say that if there

was an urgent humanitarian need, he would take the action...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 September 2014
Reference
585 c1264
House
House of Commons

Although I support the motion authorising military strikes on ISIL in Iraq, and although I fully support my party leader’s caution over extending it to Syria without UN backing, the blunt truth is that simply allowing ISIL to retreat across an invisible border, to them, that they control into Syria...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 September 2014
Reference
585 c1277
House
House of Commons

I agree absolutely.

Even Libya, supposedly a surgical operation consented to by this House in 2011, is hardly a good advertisement for us, with chaos now in the country.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 September 2014
Reference
585 c1277
House
House of Commons

Indeed. We tried to, but the Americans took no notice, frankly.

In the Syrian horror from which ISIL has sprung, of course Assad’s forces have unleashed waves of terror, but his jihadist opponents too have committed terrible atrocities. That is the context that has given birth to ISIL; not because the...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 September 2014
Reference
585 cc1278-9
House
House of Commons

I agree with the Government that it would be a folly for western powers such as Britain to barge in, cowboy-like, and lead the fight against ISIL; but we do have unique military, surveillance and intelligence capabilities which those on the front line do not have, and which should be...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2014
Reference
585 cc943-4
House
House of Commons

It is not about befriending Assad; it is about the reality of moving forward. If we do not recognise the reality, we will not move forward, but will continue to shout and scream and oppose to no effect at all.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2014
Reference
585 c944
House
House of Commons

Let me come to that, and explain.

The Prime Minister has described President Assad as “illegitimate”, implying that Britain and the United States could act in Syria with impunity. Surely that position is legally questionable, given that Assad won recent—admittedly highly manipulated— elections, and given that the divided rebel factions do...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2014
Reference
585 cc944-5
House
House of Commons

I support the hon. Gentleman’s point about resourcing the Foreign Office—and the Foreign Secretary may agree on that, too. The budget cuts, which started under the Labour Government, have been remorselessly pursued under the hon. Gentleman’s Government. For a lot of other Whitehall Departments the Foreign Office budget is not...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2014
Reference
585 c947
House
House of Commons

Is not the truth that ISIL will not be beaten without air strikes in Syria as well, and that means engaging with the Assad regime and Iran—however unpalatable—as well as with the

Saudis? Perhaps that is also a route to resolving the bitter and dangerous Shi’a-Sunni conflicts in the region, because ultimately ISIS poses a bigger threat to nations in the region than it does to us.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 September 2014
Reference
585 c281
House
House of Commons

I support air strikes on ISIS to stop its genocidal attacks in the region, particularly against Shi’a Muslims and Kurds and minorities, but there should be no question of British troops on the ground. However, we do need to support the Kurds particularly, in providing the equipment they need. In...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2014
Reference
585 c31
House
House of Commons

Given that the Sunni-Shi’a divide is now a fault line in the region and that an almost primeval form of jihadism is driving that on the Sunni side, does the Foreign Secretary agree that it is imperative that ownership of solving this conflict has to be in the region, particularly...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2014
Reference
582 c860
House
House of Commons

That this House is aware of the tragic events that took place in Camp Ashraf in the early morning of 1 September 2013, when an armed raid led by Iraqi forces who needlessly slaughtered at least 52 persons and kidnapped a number of other people who remain hostages; condemns unreservedly...

Primary sponsor
Alan Meale (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
4 September 2013
Reference
480
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that the British Army maintains depleted uranium (DU) munitions within its arsenal and that 1.9 tonnes of DU rounds were fired by UK forces during Operation Telic in Iraq; recognises continuing media reports of increased rates of certain cancers and congenital malformations in Iraq; acknowledges that...

Primary sponsor
Baroness Clark of Kilwinning (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
24 October 2012
Reference
629
House
House of Commons
Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2005
Reference
430 c1663
House
House of Commons