Proceeding contribution from Lord Hain (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 26 September 2014. It occurred during Debate on Iraq: Coalition Against ISIL.
Iraq: Coalition Against ISIL
Although I support the motion authorising military strikes on ISIL in Iraq, and although I fully support my party leader’s caution over extending it to Syria without UN backing, the blunt truth is that simply allowing ISIL to retreat across an invisible border, to them, that they control into Syria to regroup is no answer.
First, why British military action against ISIL’s barbarity but not Assad’s butchery? Should not the haunting and ill-fated legacy of invading Iraq instruct us to stay well clear? In the Cabinet in 2003, I backed Tony Blair over Iraq because I honestly believed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. I was wrong. He did not. We went to a war on a lie, and the aftermath was disastrous. That has made me deeply allergic to anything similar in the region and certainly anything remotely hinting at cowboy western intervention.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 585 c1277
- Session
- 2014-15
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Counter-terrorism Armed conflict Bombings Humanitarian aid Iraq Ethnic groups Politics and government Islam Iran Syria Middle East Military intervention Radicalism Islamic State
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-08-30 18:16:24 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-26/1409266000179
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-26/1409266000179
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-26/1409266000179