Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for subject:Jobcentres

Member X
Lynne Jones

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Jones, Lynne (29)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I presume that my right hon. Friend is aware of the memorandum circulated from the DWP, which makes it clear that the provider-led pathways to work have been far less successful than the Jobcentre Plus-led pathways. We have there a clear example of Jobcentre Plus being more effective, so why...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c832
House
House of Commons

On that point, could my right hon. Friend have a word with the Prime Minister? It was certainly the Prime Minister's view that keeping benefits so low was not an incentive to get people back to work; it did not help people to get back to work if there were...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c829
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend's interpretation of the views that I and other Labour Members expressed is a travesty. We are saying that the voluntary approach has been shown to be more effective in engaging people in the world of work, and we should pursue that approach. We are saying that...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c827
House
House of Commons

I endorse my hon. Friend's call for pilot schemes, but how does he envisage that the control scheme would work? A control scheme that just carries on as usual would offer no useful comparison with a pilot scheme that is active and in which people are positively engaged. Does he...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c824
House
House of Commons

I think that the Secretary of State has acknowledged that even the pathways to work programme has not always been successful for people with mental health problems.

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c820
House
House of Commons

I agree that if somebody has a job offer and real job opportunities, that is one thing. However, many people face a great deal of prejudice in trying to get employment, particularly those with mental health problems. I am very much opposed to any compulsion for that group, because it...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c820
House
House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I am somewhat surprised to be called as I had not realised that my new clause had been selected, so please forgive me if I am not quite ready. The new clause calls for an improvement in the level of unemployment benefit. At present, this benefit is set...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c786
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c784
House
House of Commons

I am not even sure which measure I am speaking to, but I am advised by my hon. Friend that this new clause would remove the lower rate that applies to young people.

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c786
House
House of Commons

No, I do not envisage that, because I believe that it is fundamentally wrong to discriminate against young people. Unfortunately, the new clause would not uprate general unemployment benefit. The principles are that discrimination should end and that no one should be expected to live on such a meagre amount...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c788
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely, and I have personal experience of that. I had to leave home at 18, before I went to university, because conditions at home had become so difficult. I am sure that that must apply to many young people. By the time I was 21 or 22, I...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c787
House
House of Commons

I do not have the precise total figures, but it would be £750 a year for each unemployed young person. I suggest that the hon. Gentleman can probably work out the total, but it is probably a few hundred million pounds—a sum that pales into insignificance compared with what is...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c788
House
House of Commons

I speak as one of those parents who went back to work when my children were only a few weeks' old, but does my hon. Friend agree that society should have respect for a parent's decision? If a child needs the parent to be at home, we should actually value...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c812
House
House of Commons

I agree that a child's well-being depends on the well-being of its parent. A parent who is happy and fulfilled, and not subject to undue stress, will be a better parent. When we are devising mechanisms such as this, it is important that we do not put stress on parents...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c812
House
House of Commons

We know that those who participate voluntarily in schemes are much more successful in getting into work. A leaked letter from the DWP confirmed that mandatory customers of pathways to work had a success rate of only 5.99 per cent., in the phases examined, whereas those who came forward voluntarily—who...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c797
House
House of Commons

The other new clause that I tabled, which unfortunately was not selected, would have increased the basic level of unemployment benefit of £60 a week by £15 a week. That would be equivalent to increasing benefit in line with earnings, as opposed to prices. For those under 25, the rate...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c787
House
House of Commons

I had finally got round to appreciating what my hon. Friend said, but I thank him for his intervention. We are in a recession, and unemployment is rising. It would be somewhat disingenuous to suggest that people are unemployed through their own fault. I recall my right hon. Friend's the...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c786-7
House
House of Commons

That this House notes the provisions within the Welfare Reform Bill for the contracting out of functions carried out by Jobcentre Plus; further notes that reports last year from the National Audit Office, Public Administration Select Committee and Child Poverty Action Group all found little or no evidence to support...

Primary sponsor
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
4 February 2009
Reference
698
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend said that when schemes are voluntary, there is less engagement. What evidence does he have that that is purely because they are voluntary, rather than because there has been a failure to engage people, a lack of communication and a lack of action on the part...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c190
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend give way?

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c268
House
House of Commons