Skip to main content

1-20 of 44 results for subject:Take-up

Member X
Tim Loughton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Loughton, Tim (44)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment he has made of the take up of the 30 hour childcare entitlement in West Sussex.

Asked by
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2019
Reference
243302
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on on 16 to 18 mathematics education.

Lead member
Elizabeth Truss
Answering member
Tim Loughton
Department
Department for Education
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
27 March 2012
Reference
542 c334-42WH
House
House of Commons

First, I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for South West Norfolk (Elizabeth Truss) on raising this subject, which is of great importance to us. She is right to hold the Government's feet to the fire. Indeed, she has form on that in this and other areas of education. I...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2012
Reference
542 c338-42WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on school sport.

Lead member
Gerry Sutcliffe
Answering member
Tim Loughton
Department
Department for Education
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
537 c199-223WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Bradford South (Mr Sutcliffe), a distinguished former Sports Minister, on raising this subject. It is an issue to which he is dedicated, and we all appreciate that. I also thank other hon. Members for their well informed contributions. A lot of questions have been...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
537 c219-20WH
House
House of Commons

The school games, which were launched last summer, involved more than 10,000 children in the summer pilots. I launched the version in the north-west. They have a particular focus on disability sports, which is something that has very much been missing. They will have a programme of endorsements and accreditations...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
537 c220-1WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman raises a good point. That is why, again within the school games, we have made specific money available for promoting disability sport, resourcing the national governing bodies of sports to develop a clear competitive pathway for young disabled people, ensuring the availability of follow-on activity linked to...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
537 c221-3WH
House
House of Commons

I had better move on or I will not answer any of the hon. Gentleman's points, but I think that there is a real poverty of ambition. Let me return to the issue of disabled sport and the charge about the elite nature of the school games. The opportunity to...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
537 c221WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on early years education.

Lead member
Ann Coffey
Answering member
Tim Loughton
Department
Department for Education
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
14 December 2010
Reference
520 c236-44WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Stockport (Ann Coffey) on securing the time for this important debate. I agree with the vast majority of everything she has said. As she knows, I had the opportunity to go to Stockport in October when I spent a week as a social worker...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2010
Reference
520 c240-4WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. It is a mixed picture. The network of school sport partnerships did help schools to raise participation rates in a range of areas targeted by the previous Government, and schools should be given credit for that. I pay tribute to the Youth Sport Trust and...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
519 c736-7
House
House of Commons

We have had a very good, if truncated, debate, to which passionate and genuine contributions have been made by many hon. Members. I have to say, however, that I think the hon. Member for Bury South (Mr Lewis) attended a different debate, and certainly did not listen to the speech...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
519 c735-6
House
House of Commons
I have to say that that was an extraordinarily complacent answer. If we do not test children’s eyesight, how can we know the extent of the problem? There is a poor take-up of eye tests among school-age children, and, after their eight-month check, only 50 per cent. of children have their eyes checked before starting school, so it is more likely that sight defects will emerge as the visual system develops up to the age of seven, which can lead to permanent visual loss and subsequent problems keeping up at school. Why, therefore, did the hon. Lady’s Government fail to support Conservative amendments to the Health Bill in another place, which would have ensured that all children receive a proper eye examination before they start school?
Asked by
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 June 2006
Reference
447 c1185
House
House of Commons

The gap has got wider.

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2005
Reference
440 c31
House
House of Commons

Childcare Bill. Second reading debate agreed to on question. Programme motion for proceedings in Committee, on Report and Third reading agreed to on question (formal). Money resolution and Ways and Means resolution agreed to on question (formal).

Lead member
Ruth Kelly
Answering member
Baroness May of Maidenhead
Department
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Debates on bills
Date
28 November 2005
Reference
440 c24-103
House
House of Commons

I do not think that there is a circle to square. My point is that we are in danger of treating all children under five the same, but basic attachment theory shows that children are very different in the first two years, which are all about the connections that the...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2005
Reference
440 c97-8
House
House of Commons

That is a good point. If one looks at the survey that the National Day Nurseries Association has conducted among a large sample of its members, many of the vacancies are in areas where new providers, heavily subsidised at the front end, are coming in. That cannot make sense and...

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2005
Reference
440 c91-7
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to be addressing such a packed House at this time of the evening. I feel that the general consensus that was breaking out at one stage has shortened this debate, which has been a good one with well-informed and weighty contributions from both sides of the House....

Member
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 November 2005
Reference
440 c89-91
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that the number of claimants of incapacity benefit has increased by 34,400 since May 1997; further notes that the number of working age claimants as a percentage of the total working age population has increased from 6.4 per cent. in May 1997 to 6.8 per cent....

Primary sponsor
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
25 November 2004
Reference
208
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that the average Band D bill in England in 2004-05 will be ??1,167, an increase of 69 per cent. since 1997-98; is concerned that take-up of council tax benefit fell in the last year that statistics are available from 70.76 per cent. by caseload in 2000-01...

Primary sponsor
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
25 November 2004
Reference
196
House
House of Commons