Skip to main content

1-20 of 28 results for subject:"Local development frameworks"

Member X
Lord McKenzie of Luton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McKenzie of Luton, Lord (28)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on motion to consider the Draft National Planning Policy Framework. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Hanham
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c345-88GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister, the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, for promoting and sponsoring this debate and for giving us a chance for yet another go at a debate on the NPPF. It has been a wide-ranging debate. My noble friend Lady Whitaker raised design issues; we had several...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c379-83GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness has been very generous with her time, but, just for clarity, if there is a local plan which is otherwise bang up to date, would the introduction of the NPPF itself cause that to be out of date or incomplete?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c388GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have Amendments 147FKA, 147HZA, 147HCA and 147HF in this group, which I will speak to in a moment. I will start with the question put by the noble Lord, Lord Lucas: how are we going to finish this Bill in time? I am sure the official answer...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c642-4
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has been generous in speaking to all the amendments, but I want to be clear on the housing issue that the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, described. We have a similar issue in Luton. One authority with a desperate need for affordable housing that cannot be accommodated within...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c651
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have tabled Amendment 153AKA in this group. It requires the local authority to prepare and maintain a retail diversity scheme as part of the local development scheme. It calls for a sequential approach to the development of a hierarchy, putting existing centres first, followed by edge-of-centre locations...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c684-5
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister repeat what has been placed in the Library this week? Was this today or yesterday? What notification has been given of that?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c681
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness answers, can I thank the Minister for alerting us to the regulations which have been posted in the Library? It is very difficult to keep abreast of what is going on in this Bill. We had some government amendments tabled yesterday of which we had no...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c682
House
House of Lords

148ZZZZBH: Clause 97, Page 76, line 13, at end insert— ““( ) In section 23 (adoption of local development documents) after subsection (3) insert— ““(4) Subject to subsection (5), if a development plan document has not been adopted by the date that this subsection is brought into force, it cannot...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c699
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a probing amendment, prompted by the National Housing Federation. It specifically focuses on an authority that has not adopted its local plan document and provides that this cannot constitute a reason for refusing planning permission. In a sense, this picks up just part of the federation’s...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c700
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister. I will certainly withdraw the amendment, but I am still a little unclear about the situation in which the local planning authority has not yet gone through the processes and got its local development plan in place. What will determine the acceptability of planning...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c701
House
House of Lords

148ZZZBB: Clause 99, Page 76, line 40, at end insert— ““( ) In section 205 (the levy), at the end of subsection (2) insert ““without prejudicing the provision of affordable housing in accordance with the development plan””.””

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c702
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister again. I think that my noble friend Lord Berkeley has articulated the issue more effectively than I did. I would like to read the record on this. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 148ZZZZBH withdrawn. Clauses...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c702
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 148ZZZBB, I will also speak to the other amendments in my name, namely 148ZZZBC, 148ZZZBD and 148ZZBAA. I will comment on the other amendments in this group after they have been spoken to. Amendments 148ZZZBB, 148ZZZBC and 148ZZZBD deal with the community infrastructure levy and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c702-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have Amendments 148ZZA and 148ZZZBA in this group, but they are consistent with the amendment moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Greengross, which we support. They have been proposed to us jointly by Shelter, the TCPA and the National Housing Federation. These amendments would help to ensure...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c676-8
House
House of Lords

In which case, I am most grateful to the noble Earl. Amendment 148ZZZBB withdrawn. Amendments 148ZZZBC to 148ZZBAA not moved. Clause 99 agreed.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for a full and indeed very positive, or broadly positive, reply. Certainly at this hour, I should like to read the record and perhaps revert to those who pressed this particular amendment on us to talk it through with them in detail. I...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I endorse what the noble Lord has just said. We increasingly have concerns about the timing of the process. We are doing everything we can to make sure that we make progress, but there is an issue with trying to resolve some of these matters when the House...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c380
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I had the 11 am, rather than the 11.10, list this morning. Amendment 147FFA Moved by

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c448-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was not sure that we had formally debated Amendment 147FF, which is in a separate group—although I think the noble Lord spoke to it.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c448
House
House of Lords