Skip to main content

1-20 of 75 results for subject:"Migrant workers"

Member X
Lord McKenzie of Luton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McKenzie of Luton, Lord (75)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, and I applaud her campaign. Recent years have seen a number of key changes to the UK pensions landscape, some concerning accumulation, such as auto-enrolment and master trusts, and some decumulation, notably pension freedoms. Some concern...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
800 cc551-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we should thank the noble Baroness, Lady Scott of Needham Market, for initiating this debate. While the referendum campaign provoked some discussion around the significance for disabled people of remaining in or leaving the EU, these matters were not centre stage in our national debate. There was neither...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1325-7
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord sits down, I thank him for that full response, but can he deal with the point about whether there has been any development of the definition of work for the operation of the cap in universal credit?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1486
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the update that we have had. I guess that we just look forward to further developments on those issues. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 4 withdrawn. Clause 43 : Regulations: procedure Amendments 5 and 6 Clause 43 : Regulations: procedure Amendments...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1487
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister answers the question that I posed earlier, perhaps I may take the opportunity to add our thanks. The Minister’s enthusiasm for universal credit and his commitment to evidence-based policy have been evident to all of us. He has borne a very heavy load in bringing the Bill...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1498
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pity that this came up at the end of the Report stage and that we do not have another chance to review the record. I am minded not to press the matter this evening, but frankly I am not sure whether colleagues in another place...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1496
House
House of Lords

From what the noble Lord has just said, it seems that what the Government did on Report sought to change the import of what is set out in the Child Poverty Act. If it removes what the noble Lord thought might be the need to have interim targets along the...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1495-6
House
House of Lords

I do not know whether the Minister is going to say anything further about poverty figures, but how does he deal with the report from the Family and Parenting Institute, prepared by the IFS, showing that relative child poverty will increase between 2010-11 and 2015-16 by around 400,000, and that...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1463
House
House of Lords

4: Clause 40, page 18, line 40, leave out ““work has such meaning as may be prescribed”” and insert ““““better paid work”” and ““more paid work”” shall have such meaning as may be prescribed in regulations subject to the affirmative resolution procedure””

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1483
House
House of Lords

14: Clause 146, page 109, line 4, at end insert— ““( ) Nothing in subsections (1) to (5) have the effect of changing the requirement in the Child Poverty Act 2010 for the Secretary of State to publish and lay before Parliament a UK Child Poverty Strategy and to describe...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1493
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one issue that lacks clarity at present concerns ““work””, ““better paid work”” and ““more work””. We are using the opportunity of Third Reading to elicit further information on this important matter. The amendment seeks to ensure that not only ““work”” must be defined for the purposes of universal...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1483-5
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord. Obviously we support the amendment. Amendment 3 agreed. Clause 40 : Interpretation of Part 1 Clause 40 : Interpretation of Part 1

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1483
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not believe that we have a problem with the amendments in this group, but perhaps the noble Lord will clarify something. If we are removing the power of Scottish Ministers to deal with consequential amendments, where does the power lie—or is the Minister saying that there...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1483
House
House of Lords

What the Minister says about affirmative regulations is right, but is he aware that it is the stated position of the Conservative Party in this House that it does not vote against affirmative regulations? In recent times we have had several such debates, and the Conservative Party has declined to...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1467
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we support the amendment moved so comprehensively and eloquently by the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher. This has been a powerful debate with a strong ethical strand, as my noble friend Lord Peston said that it should be. My job is made easier by the contribution we have just...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1460-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 14 seeks further clarification about the purpose of the changes that the Government introduced to the Child Poverty Act on Report. These altered the description of what the Government would do to achieve the target to end child poverty by 2020, as set out in the Act,...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1493-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we support the thrust of this amendment. Perhaps I may ask one question. We had a helpful briefing note from the Box which reads as follows: ““This amendment therefore is designed through this regulation-making power to enable the Secretary of State, so far as possible within the unified...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1497
House
House of Lords

Welfare Reform Bill. Lords third reading debate, agreed to on question. Bill passed and returned to the Commons with amendments.

Lead member
Lord Freud
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Division list corrected in Lords Minutes of 1 February 2012: Lord Leach of Fairford should have been included in the list of those voting Not Content in place of Lord Leitch.
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1446-72, 1482-99
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many National Insurance numbers have been allocated to (a) Bulgarians, and (b) Romanians, since those countries’ accessions to the European Union.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Answer received between Monday 27 July and Monday 3 August 2009.
Date
5 October 2009
Reference
712 c400-1WA; 5096
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government why data on allocation of National Insurance numbers were removed from the UK Border Agency's quarterly Bulgarian and Romanian accession statistics; and where they are now.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Answer received between Monday 27 July and Monday 3 August 2009.
Date
5 October 2009
Reference
5095; 712 c400-1WA
House
House of Lords