Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for subject:Software

Member X
Lord McKenzie of Luton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McKenzie of Luton, Lord (22)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I understand what the noble Lord is saying and recognise his ongoing concerns about the IT systems. I agree that it is important that those systems are right. The commission will inevitably inherit the current systems as improved by PR1. The fact that we resist being specific on...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c38-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the noble Lord’s amendment and his interest in the movement of cases to the new arrangements. It is an important subject which we have discussed before. We know from experience that this will be one of the most significant challenges for the commission. In the light...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c37-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, of course one would be foolish not to recognise that there may well be circumstances in extremis where the financial adjustment that shared care would produce could discourage shared care, but we do not believe that that is the generality. As I said, I believe that there is...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c36
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for tabling this amendment, the import of which I understand a little better having heard him speak to it. The amendment would mean that when there had been shared care of 52 or more nights in the preceding 12-month period, the amount of...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c34-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, for the amendment, which, as he explained, seeks to extend the current period of 12 months during which parents with minutes of agreement registered in the Books of Council and Session or the sheriff court books may not apply to the...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c32-3
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 4: 4: Clause 62, page 50, line 17, at end insert— ““( ) An order under subsection (3) may include such transitional provision or savings as the Secretary of State considers necessary or expedient in connection with bringing any provision of this Act into force.”” On Question,...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c33
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am happy to confirm that it will be by an affirmative process. That is right, given the nature of the decision. On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 35 [Registered maintenance agreements: Scotland]:

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c31
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is right, of course, but it follows the consequences and the review.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may explain what I said. The amendment clarifies that should the commission cease to be a Crown body following the review by the Government, the order will be made by statutory instrument. I hope that has clarified the matter.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c30
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Clause 11, page 5, line 36, after ““order”” insert ““made by statutory instrument”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I shall speak also to the amendments grouped with Amendment No. 1. They are both minor and technical and make clear the implementation process by which...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c30
House
House of Lords

Yes, my Lords. Stakeholders will be engaged on a range of matters, of which transition will certainly be one, as will the communications strategy that needs to go alongside that process. That will not necessarily be completed this year but will be ongoing, as it has been in the construction...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c39
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot allow that to stand. I referred to the White Paper which set down the three-year timetable. Of course a lot of detailed thinking and planning has run on from that and continues on a daily basis, but that does not mean that we want to adhere...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c39
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that this Bill do now pass. In doing so, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, for his kind comments and reciprocate by thanking all noble Lords on the opposition Benches, my own Benches and the Cross Benches for the constructive way in which...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c46
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot specifically confirm that; the precise arrangements will be in part up to the commission, but it seems to me that arrangements such as that are entirely appropriate and help to get misunderstandings out of the way and differentiate them from situations that underline a parent’s need...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c45
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, for moving the amendment, which seeks to extend the current period of 12 months during which parents with a court consent order for child maintenance may not apply to the commission for a maintenance calculation. The amendment would prevent such parents...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c44-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was rather bemused by the amendment and I confess to remaining somewhat in that state. As set down, the amendments in this group would replace nearly all references to ““paragraph”” within Schedule 6 with ““Schedule””. Each paragraph within Schedule 6 enables information held by the specific government...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c41-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps the noble Lord will allow me to intervene, as this is an important point. It is important that data channelled from one department to another for use in, in this case, child maintenance calculations is done through a formal, controlled process to ensure that the data are...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c42-3
House
House of Lords

Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill. Queens consent signified. Lords third reading debate. Bill passed and returned to the Commons with amendments.

Lead member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Answering member
Lord Skelmersdale
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on bills
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
702 c29-46
House
House of Lords

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord McKenzie of Luton on 18 April (WA 220), whether they (a) have accepted the recommendation in the report HMRC Online Services that the XBRL computer language should be used for the filing of company tax returns; (b) have considered the degree to which...

Asked by
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 May 2006
Reference
5221; 681 c61WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they have any plans to require companies to file tax returns using the XBRL computer language; and, if so, whether they have estimated the costs that will be imposed on small and medium-sized businesses.

Asked by
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2006
Reference
680 c219WA; 5050
House
House of Lords