Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.


Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill

My Lords, of course one would be foolish not to recognise that there may well be circumstances in extremis where the financial adjustment that shared care would produce could discourage shared care, but we do not believe that that is the generality. As I said, I believe that there is an opposite effect, where some recognition of the costs involved in shared care will be reflected in the commission’s formula. I was simply in a sense stating the obvious that there could certainly be extreme cases where contact is affected by these adjustments. Essentially it depends on arrangements under which contact is settled. Obviously, if it is settled by the court that is one thing and if it is settled by voluntary arrangements that is something else. I come back to the point. We believe that a central point of the Bill is to encourage voluntary arrangements where appropriate. We believe that that is the environment where shared care can best flourish.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c36 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Child support Children Compensation Administration Software Child Support Agency Diseases Maintenance Payments Mesothelioma Scotland Departmental coordination Revenue and Customs Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
Legislation
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk