Skip to main content

1-20 of 38 results for subject:Software

Member X
John Pugh

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Pugh, John (38)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Had we reached Question 10, I would have asked what recent assessment has been made of Government policy on open source software and open standards.
Asked by
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
542 c782
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what recent assessment he has made of Government policy on open source software and open standards; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
100946; 542 c778W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Asked by
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Topical questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Notes
Lead question not printed
Date
21 March 2012
Reference
100958; 542 c782
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Weir. I congratulate the hon. Member for Houghton and Sunderland South (Bridget Phillipson) on having started an important debate on an important theme. She will understand that I cannot comment on the situation in the north-east, so I shall concentrate...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c78-9WH
House
House of Commons

The second answer that the hon. Gentleman was provided with seems to possess greater clarity than the first, because the first is, I guess, contestable. We can have a long discussion about how we can and cannot target breaks. A rational argument can quite decently be made that the software...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c80-1WH
House
House of Commons

I am not party to the discussions that have led to that change. Clearly, there were opportunities for previous Governments to do precisely that. The opportunities for the British software industry are huge. The Government just need to make the right move. Some of the right moves are plain and...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c82WH
House
House of Commons

I am not sure that the causal chain is as emphatic and clear-cut as the hon. Lady represents it, but later I shall come to the business of a level playing field. It could be argued, could it not, that the indicators for what the industry offers and its potential...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c79-80WH
House
House of Commons

We all need to be cautious about such things, and I must add to that the fact that my right hon. Friend the Deputy Prime Minister made some significant announcements the other day at the event involving Microsoft. We all need to be wary about these issues.

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c88WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will recall that he voted for tuition fees in the last Parliament and I did not. I say nothing about the current policy, but at the time I said that the introduction of tuition fees and top-up fees would reduce the number of people applying to university....

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2010
Reference
518 c85WH
House
House of Commons
The Government have talked a good game for some time about open source software, but have done very little. What more can the Parliamentary Secretary do to encourage Departments to implement real change and reduce the horrific cost and genuine inconvenience of software licensing?
Asked by
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2009
Reference
492 c1490
House
House of Commons
What guidance his Department provides to other Departments on the use of open source software.
Asked by
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2009
Reference
492 c1490; 276396
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions for what reason the personal benefit advice software provided by Jobcentre Plus is compatible with MS Windows platforms only.

Asked by
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 January 2008
Reference
470 c1151-2W; 174090
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on Government IT and software procurement.

Lead member
John Pugh
Answering member
Angela Eagle
Department
Treasury
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c46-52WH
House
House of Commons

IT procurement within Government is thought to be an unmitigated disaster, but that is not true. There is good and bad procurement in Government, just as there is in the private sector, and mistakes made in the private sector are sometimes similar to those made in the public sector. Nevertheless,...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c46-7WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is far more expert in this field than I am. He will be aware of the debate on XML and of what standards should be used for office applications and the like.

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c47WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for what the Minister is saying; it is a useful background and encouraging to hear in some respects. The point that I was making, which she has not dealt with, was not about whether some of the tenders are open and above board and give everybody a...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c52WH
House
House of Commons

That is the type of canard that comes up every time—that we must use a particular supplier because everybody uses it. If the Government are obliging people to use a supplier, that becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy, as I am sure the Minister will acknowledge.

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c49WH
House
House of Commons

I exonerate the Government on that point and turn my accusation against the members of that Committee. I made my representations and will continue to do so. This issue is as clear a case of illegal state aid as, for example, the BBC iPlayer—a case that will go to the...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c48-9WH
House
House of Commons

I agree. The hon. Gentleman makes a fair point, and the more we converge around open standards, the fewer arguments—arguments of the sort that I am involved in now—there will be. In fact, Microsoft is not the only villain of the piece. The BBC was forced to withdraw its net...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c48WH
House
House of Commons

That this House congratulates the Open University and other schools, colleges and universities for utilising free and open source software to deliver cost-effective educational benefit not just for their own institutions but also the wider community; and expresses concern that Becta and the Department for Education and Skills, through the...

Primary sponsor
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
21 November 2006
Reference
179
House
House of Commons