Skip to main content

1-20 of 68 results for subject:Unemployment

Member X
Lord Skelmersdale
Session X
2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Skelmersdale, Lord (68)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful to the noble Baroness. I was thinking that a member of staff from a jobcentre could, for example, read the local paper. The information is available, but not necessarily to the client at the time when he wants it. The noble Baroness has made a valuable suggestion.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c190GC
House
House of Lords

The phrase "buckets of salt" comes to mind. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 24 withdrawn.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c178GC
House
House of Lords

Unlike with local housing allowance, there has been a fairly prompt evaluation of this pilot. I note that the Minister said that it did not appear to make much difference and, in any case, that it was not cost-effective. That is a very good reason for not pursuing it. We...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c179GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 26 26: Clause 1, page 4, line 16, at end insert— "( ) No provisions in this section shall come into effect unless the Secretary of State is satisfied with the readiness of job centres to manage "work for your benefit" schemes."

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c182GC
House
House of Lords

What I think the noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood—I am putting words into his mouth now—and I would require is a timetable, not least a timetable between the decision to end the pilots and the finish of the independent evaluation, showing how long it took. As the noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood,...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c182GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is quite right; my terminology was wrong. Clause 1 is indeed about welfare to work, which, as we all know, involves contractors and, as I think we all know, subcontractors. Someone is going to have to monitor all this. As the contractors in the pilots will be...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c193GC
House
House of Lords

Rather like the Government never apologising for either inflation or, as we have now, deflation, I do not apologise for conflation. The whole point of what I was trying to say, and I was very ably backed by virtually all noble Lords—not quite all since the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis,...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c192GC
House
House of Lords

We have had two and a half days on Clause 1 and there are still questions to be asked, as both the noble Baroness, Lady Afshar, and the noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, have pointed out. I have said I do not know how many times during those two and a...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c196-7GC
House
House of Lords

Of course, the centre of the DWP is not dysfunctional, which I accused the individual jobcentres of being. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 26 withdrawn.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c193GC
House
House of Lords

Cap that. I support the rationale behind the noble Baroness’s amendments; indeed, as the Committee will note, I have added my name to Amendment 42. They would ensure that the participant was given a fair and reasonable chance to prove himself to have good cause for failing to uphold his...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c224-5GC
House
House of Lords

Does what the Minister has just said mean that there will be no interview of any sort before the child is three? That is what I am really trying to get at.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c204GC
House
House of Lords

No; it has nothing to do with conditionality. All that I am interested in is the interview process.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c204GC
House
House of Lords

I was asking whether what he has said means that there will be no interview for single parents under this clause before the child is three years old. It is a fairly simple question.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c204GC
House
House of Lords

I hope that we can complete this in seven and a half minutes, but we shall see. Judging by our rate of progress so far, perhaps I am being optimistic, but I hope not. Amendment 43 seeks to remove the words "or remain in" from the list of definitions in...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c230-1GC
House
House of Lords

Before we do that, I understood the Minister to say that the two pilots that we are talking about in respect of Clause 1 would start in October 2010 and that the final results would be in 2012. Is that correct?

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c199GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 43 43: Clause 2, page 5, line 48, leave out "or remain in"

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c230GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for that information. I had occasion, I think on Thursday, to comment when I saw two Clerks sitting at the table here. There is a training technique, which is operated very often by employers, that is known as "sitting next to Nellie"—in other words, training by example....

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c232GC
House
House of Lords

I have tabled several amendments in this group and it might be appropriate if I speak to them now. The noble Baroness has tabled amendments that would change the emphasis of the scheme from one of a duty to fulfil obligations to one of entitlement. This is an area where...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c209-10GC
House
House of Lords

I am afraid I am going to be the grit in the ointment on the amendment, which will dismay many Members of the Committee. During our extensive debates on Clause 1 we have, from time to time, strayed into Clause 2, for which I was in part, but by no...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c203-4GC
House
House of Lords

That would probably be helpful. None the less, there is a movement from the jobcentre to the contractor. Someone will have to organise that movement for the individual claimant, and I cannot see anyone, other than the job adviser, who is likely to do that. Therefore, as I said, I...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
711 c193GC
House
House of Lords