Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.


Welfare Reform Bill

I am grateful for that information. I had occasion, I think on Thursday, to comment when I saw two Clerks sitting at the table here. There is a training technique, which is operated very often by employers, that is known as "sitting next to Nellie"—in other words, training by example. My noble friend might or might not illustrate the point that I am making. However, a person remaining in a job is less a feature of the Bill—although I would not disagree for a second that it is desirable—and more a feature of the new employee’s relationship within the organisation in which they are employed. Sometimes the employer can help significantly in keeping that person in a job. However, it is difficult to see what the outside adviser, whether a contractor or someone from Jobcentre Plus, can do to add to this process. But now is not the time to develop that thought and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 43 withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c232GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Children Disability living allowance Contracts Benefits rules Carers Age Advisory services Autism Fraud Employment Jobseeker's allowance Income support Jobcentres Expenditure Exemptions Interviews Ethnic groups Jobcentre Plus Learning disability Offenders Mental illness Pilot schemes Recruitment Staff Minority groups Postal services Lone parents Social security Social security benefits Vulnerable adults Training Research Rural areas Unemployment Unemployed people Voluntary work Literacy New deal schemes Labour market Polygamy Employment and support allowance Community orders
Legislation
Welfare Reform Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk