Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for dept:"Ministry of Defence"

Member X
Lord Tunnicliffe
Subject X
Contracts

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Tunnicliffe, Lord (22)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Contracts (22)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl of Minto
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
19 March 2024
Reference
837 cc36-43GC
House
House of Lords

I rise with a heavy burden because I was the party spokesman in 2014 when this document was created. If you think that this document is a problem, you should compare it to the Yellow Book that preceded it. I thank the Minister for presenting this instrument, but I must...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2024
Reference
837 cc40-2GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc340-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for introducing this statutory instrument. On the other hand, that is not really true: the facts of life are that I would rather not spend my weekend studying SIs for a scenario that is deeply absurd and the Government should have ruled out...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c344GC
House
House of Lords

I feel that I have lost my place. Is the Minister saying that non-derogated invitations to tender will be restricted to the UK suppliers and Gibraltar, or will they be available to worldwide competition, with certain exceptions?

4.45 pm

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc345-6GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to ask the same question over and again, but it is important: putting the derogated areas covered presently by Article 346 to one side, do the regulations—noble Lords must realise that I cannot read them; it took all my time to read the Explanatory Memorandum and try...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c346GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl says there will be no changes. I understand that at the moment, in non-derogated areas, EU suppliers have a right to bid and we have an obligation to take their bids seriously. I think that under the new situation they do not have this right and that...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c347GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
9 July 2018
Reference
792 cc792-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for presenting the regulations. Part 2 of the 2014 Act and the subsequent Single Source Contract Regulations 2014 are supported by these Benches. Unfortunately, I have lived through every bit of their creation and evolution. The key thing is: are they effective? The way...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2018
Reference
792 cc793-4
House
House of Lords

Is that an 8% to 10% increase in the contacts which become qualifying, or is it a 50% increase in those that qualify? If the noble Earl does not know, I am perfectly happy to wait for a letter.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2018
Reference
792 c795
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating the Answer. I have to admit to being little short of amazed by this award. Yesterday’s Daily Telegraph said:

“An assessment by financial analytics experts from Company Watch, which is used by the MOD, gave Capita a risk score of 10 out of...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2018
Reference
791 c2162
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the Nimrod Review.

Lead member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1595-608
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I recognise the contribution made by the noble Baroness, Lady Cohen, to defence, and her role. I can agree with her statement to the extent that Haddon-Cave admitted that he took no evidence in this area. Our acceptance of the report specifically concerns acceptance of the recommendations which...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1603
House
House of Lords

I think I recall that, many years ago, the noble Lord flew me to an oil rig. The Secretary of State announced yesterday that the Nimrod MR2 would be brought out of service 12 months earlier than planned. He emphasised, as do I, that that was not related to the...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1604
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble and gallant Lord for his comments but he will forgive me if I do not respond to them because he seems to have made some general remarks on costs and on the present funding of the Armed Forces. The essence of the issue before...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1605
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the MAA will have that power. It will audit, in a sense, everything that is done on the safety environment, all the inter-service documentation and any significant alternations, and it will have an accident investigation capability.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1602
House
House of Lords

I will write to the noble Lord more specifically on that, but my understanding is that the power will be clear.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1602
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the concerns expressed come from the report, not from the MoD. The MoD has carefully avoided any comment on these individuals for the reasons I gave earlier. Clearly, there is a police investigation which means that there is a case, but I absolutely refuse to give any further...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1606
House
House of Lords

Essentially, Mr Haddon-Cave was given a brief that allowed him to choose who he interviewed. I do not know or understand his thinking. He interviewed those he thought it was appropriate to interview. I was also pressed on non-executive directors. In this complex matter it is all too easy to...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1602
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank both noble Lords for their responses, particularly to the extent to which I think that they support the creation of the MAA and the changes that that brings about. I will therefore not go into too much detail on their questions, but pick on some particular...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
715 c1601-2
House
House of Lords