1-20 of 35 results for subject:Iraq
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.306 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.008 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Iraq
- We searched for
- subject_t:Iraq OR subject_ses:11044
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether any UK personnel deployed on Operation Telic have reported any ill effects due to exposure to legacy chemical weapons and made any claims for compensation due to exposure, whether real or perceived, to chemical weapons.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether any UK personnel deployed on Operation Telic have reported any ill effects due to exposure to legacy chemical weapons and made any claims for compensation due to exposure, whether real or perceived, to chemical weapons.
This information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
However, we have identified the Service personnel who formed the Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear teams involved in the operation to destroy Iraqi chemical weapons and there is no record of any of these personnel having made claims relating to exposure to chemical weapons.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many UK personnel were involved in the destruction of Borak chemical rockets in 2006.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many UK personnel were involved in the destruction of Borak chemical rockets in 2006.
UK personnel destroyed Al-Borak rockets on two occasions in Iraq during 2006. On each occasion some 10 UK personnel were involved in the destruction and the subsequent survey to confirm that no explosive or chemical contamination remained in the area. In addition, UK personnel transported the munitions to the site and provided perimeter security.
Is not the truth that ISIL will not be beaten without air strikes in Syria as well, and that means engaging with the Assad regime and Iran—however unpalatable—as well as with the
Saudis? Perhaps that is also a route to resolving the bitter and dangerous Shi’a-Sunni conflicts in the region, because ultimately ISIS poses a bigger threat to nations in the region than it does to us.
Is not the truth that ISIL will not be beaten without air strikes in Syria as well, and that means engaging with the Assad regime and Iran—however unpalatable—as well as with the
Saudis? Perhaps that is also a route to resolving the bitter and dangerous Shi’a-Sunni conflicts in the region, because ultimately ISIS poses a bigger threat to nations in the region than it does to us.
I will make two points to the right hon. Gentleman, whose views on this matter I respect. First, I would argue that Assad’s brutality has been one of the things that has helped generate the appalling regime that ISIS represents. Secondly, what we want to see—we are consistent across the piece on this—is democratic Governments that are pluralistic and represent all their people. We want to see that in Iraq, which is why we support Prime Minister al-Abadi in his attempts to build an inclusive Government, and we should support attempts in Syria to have a democratic transition to a regime that can represent everyone in Syria.
Pursuant to his Answer of 22nd February, c256, to the honourable Member for Kingston upon Hull North, and pursuant to paragraph D4.62 of the Scott Report, what steps he has taken to contact the honourable Members for Chesterfield, Carmarthen, Clwyd South West, Middlesbrough, Edinburgh South and Crewe and Nantwich in...
Pursuant to his Answer of 22nd February, c256, to the honourable Member for Kingston upon Hull North, and pursuant to paragraph D4.62 of the Scott Report, what steps he has taken to contact the honourable Members for Chesterfield, Carmarthen, Clwyd South West, Middlesbrough, Edinburgh South and Crewe and Nantwich in...
What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.104 that the class claims made in the Matrix Churchill trial should have had no place in a criminal trial.
What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.104 that the class claims made in the Matrix Churchill trial should have had no place in a criminal trial.
Pursuant to 272 c17, when he read the letter from the Deputy Prime Minister dated 11th September; and various other questions on same.
Pursuant to 272 c17, when he read the letter from the Deputy Prime Minister dated 11th September; and various other questions on same.
What further assessment he makes of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G13.125 page 1396 in respect of his legal and constitutional responsibility to promote the public interest; and various other questions on same.
What further assessment he makes of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G13.125 page 1396 in respect of his legal and constitutional responsibility to promote the public interest; and various other questions on same.
What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.58 in respect of Viscount Simon's judgment in Duncan v Cammell Laird, 1942/
What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.58 in respect of Viscount Simon's judgment in Duncan v Cammell Laird, 1942/
What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.60 that government is entitled to authorise the disclosure of its confidential or secret documents.
What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.60 that government is entitled to authorise the disclosure of its confidential or secret documents.