1-20 of 26 results for subject:Deployment
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.307 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Deployment
- We searched for
- subject_t:Deployment OR subject_ses:90866
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many times (1) personnel, and (2) equipment, of the Jersey Territorial Army have been mobilised in support of UK military operations since 1991.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many times (1) personnel, and (2) equipment, of the Jersey Territorial Army have been mobilised in support of UK military operations since 1991.
Since 1991 Jersey Field Squadron RE (M) have been mobilised eleven* times in support of UK military operations. All these mobilisations involved both personnel and equipment.
As Jersey's contribution to the UK Defence, the Field Squadron deploys trained reservists to support the Regular Army both on exercises and operations in UK and overseas and have served in both Iraq and Afghanistan as well as supporting Defence’s contribution to the cross Government operations during the COVID 19 pandemic.
*This figure has been drawn from records held on computer systems that have been migrated over the time period, and therefore reflects the current data available.
My Lords, I am glad that ratcheting up diplomatic efforts is going well with our European partners. Has the Foreign Office done sufficient work yet on how we will replace that European diplomatic network if we crash out of the EU without a deal within the next 10 days?
My Lords, I am glad that ratcheting up diplomatic efforts is going well with our European partners. Has the Foreign Office done sufficient work yet on how we will replace that European diplomatic network if we crash out of the EU without a deal within the next 10 days?
My Lords, I can speak directly to that: we continue to work with European partners. Last week, I was at the United Nations, where we were working hand in glove with both Germany and France on important issues, including the promotion of women in peace-keeping. We will continue to strengthen those international alliances. I want to be absolutely clear that, notwithstanding our departure from the European Union, we remain part of Europe. Our European alliances are important, and we continue to strengthen and collaborate on them. The Iran nuclear deal and the nuclear proliferation deal are recent examples of how European partners continue to work together. We are beyond Brexit when it comes to international co-operation—that will continue internationally and with our European partners.
I thank the Minister for that non-Answer. Can he confirm that the normal aircraft carrier task force requires two, three or four frigates, one or two submarines and a couple of support ships, and that to maintain a task force of that size in the Pacific requires at least as many ships at home, in maintenance or on their way in and out? Does he recall the Secretary of State for Defence’s speech at the Royal United Services Institute some weeks ago, in which he promised that we intend in our future global
deployment to keep six ships permanently in the Gulf and maintain a permanent presence in the Caribbean and the Asia-Pacific? He said:
“Our vision is for these ships to form part of 2 Littoral Strike Groups complete with escorts, support vessels and helicopters. One would be based east of Suez … and one based west of Suez in the Mediterranean”.
Is the Minister confident that the Navy is capable of supporting all these parts of the Secretary of State’s vision?
I thank the Minister for that non-Answer. Can he confirm that the normal aircraft carrier task force requires two, three or four frigates, one or two submarines and a couple of support ships, and that to maintain a task force of that size in the Pacific requires at least as many ships at home, in maintenance or on their way in and out? Does he recall the Secretary of State for Defence’s speech at the Royal United Services Institute some weeks ago, in which he promised that we intend in our future global
deployment to keep six ships permanently in the Gulf and maintain a permanent presence in the Caribbean and the Asia-Pacific? He said:
“Our vision is for these ships to form part of 2 Littoral Strike Groups complete with escorts, support vessels and helicopters. One would be based east of Suez … and one based west of Suez in the Mediterranean”.
Is the Minister confident that the Navy is capable of supporting all these parts of the Secretary of State’s vision?
My Lords, we will always have a sovereign task group capability. As I said, the carriers will operate as part of a maritime task group, which will be tailored to meet the required tasks in a particular case. The precise number and mix of vessels deployed would depend on operational circumstances. As the noble Lord knows, we will be able to draw on a range of modern and highly capable vessels to support the carriers, including Type 45 destroyers, Type 23 frigates, Astute-class submarines and, in due course, Type 26 frigates. We will also work routinely with ships from allied navies.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what they consider to be the minimum size and composition of a United Kingdom aircraft carrier task force when deployed to the Pacific.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what they consider to be the minimum size and composition of a United Kingdom aircraft carrier task force when deployed to the Pacific.
My Lords, the United Kingdom carrier strike group will achieve initial operating capability in December 2020 and deploy in 2021. The size and composition of that group is set by the deployment requirements as determined during operational planning.
My Lords, as part of its contingency planning for a crash-out no-deal Brexit, is the Home Office preparing measures to discourage British citizens from leaving the country?
My Lords, as part of its contingency planning for a crash-out no-deal Brexit, is the Home Office preparing measures to discourage British citizens from leaving the country?
No, my Lords, we are not.
My Lords, Boris Johnson, when Foreign Secretary, talked about sending an entire task force through the Malacca Straits to the South China Sea, or wherever. Do the Government see that as one of their priorities, perhaps spending more time in the Pacific than in the Atlantic as we move to being global rather than European, or are we to continue to send just the odd frigate from time to time, hoping that no one will attack it while it is there on its own?
My Lords, Boris Johnson, when Foreign Secretary, talked about sending an entire task force through the Malacca Straits to the South China Sea, or wherever. Do the Government see that as one of their priorities, perhaps spending more time in the Pacific than in the Atlantic as we move to being global rather than European, or are we to continue to send just the odd frigate from time to time, hoping that no one will attack it while it is there on its own?
Any Royal Naval deployments are clearly reflected upon at length and planned very carefully by the high naval command, and that would be the case for existing operations or any potential future operations.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the strategic rationale for the deployment of Royal Navy ships east of the Malacca Straits.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the strategic rationale for the deployment of Royal Navy ships east of the Malacca Straits.
My Lords, these ships are present in the region to provide a clear and substantive demonstration of the UK’s commitment to the peace, security and prosperity of the region as a whole, as well as to demonstrate support for the rules-based international system.
My Lords, is that demonstration short term, or do the Government intend to maintain those three ships on station east of the Malacca Straits? The Minister will recall that when a Labour Government decided 51 years ago to withdraw from the east of Suez, part of the argument was that keeping a ship on station east of Singapore required another four naval ships in place to prepare for moving out and so on. We require virtually half of the British Navy to commit to keeping three ships in the South China Sea. If we follow the Foreign Secretary’s promise—as we always do—and send an aircraft carrier with a full complement of support ships east of the Malacca Straits, with aircraft on board the carrier, that would be half of the British Navy already. Probably most of the British Navy would be committed to the South China Sea. Is that really a strategic priority over the defence of our waters and the seas around Europe?
My Lords, is that demonstration short term, or do the Government intend to maintain those three ships on station east of the Malacca Straits? The Minister will recall that when a Labour Government decided 51 years ago to withdraw from the east of Suez, part of the argument was that keeping a ship on station east of Singapore required another four naval ships in place to prepare for moving out and so on. We require virtually half of the British Navy to commit to keeping three ships in the South China Sea. If we follow the Foreign Secretary’s promise—as we always do—and send an aircraft carrier with a full complement of support ships east of the Malacca Straits, with aircraft on board the carrier, that would be half of the British Navy already. Probably most of the British Navy would be committed to the South China Sea. Is that really a strategic priority over the defence of our waters and the seas around Europe?
My Lords, Royal Navy deployments are thought about and planned very carefully. They are also kept under regular review. The judgment of Ministers, and, indeed, of the Royal Navy, was that these deployments would fulfil multiple important objectives for UK plc. That remains the case.
My Lords, it is 50 years since the then Government announced that we would withdraw from east of Suez. They published a White Paper and there was substantial debate in the Houses of Parliament. The Foreign Secretary, first in Bahrain and then in Delhi, has spoken of deploying an aircraft carrier group to the Indian Ocean and of Diego Garcia being a major UK and US base. I am told that to maintain an aircraft carrier group in the Indian Ocean would take almost half the surface vessels available in the fleet. Presumably, there would be a significant air and land element on Diego Garcia. Will the Government bring this major shift in policy to Parliament, or does the MoD think that the Foreign Secretary was speaking a little out of turn and a little unbriefed?
My Lords, it is 50 years since the then Government announced that we would withdraw from east of Suez. They published a White Paper and there was substantial debate in the Houses of Parliament. The Foreign Secretary, first in Bahrain and then in Delhi, has spoken of deploying an aircraft carrier group to the Indian Ocean and of Diego Garcia being a major UK and US base. I am told that to maintain an aircraft carrier group in the Indian Ocean would take almost half the surface vessels available in the fleet. Presumably, there would be a significant air and land element on Diego Garcia. Will the Government bring this major shift in policy to Parliament, or does the MoD think that the Foreign Secretary was speaking a little out of turn and a little unbriefed?
My Lords, there is no question but that the UK and US military facility in Diego Garcia contributes significantly towards regional and global security. The UK footprint may not be major in size, but it represents a significant contribution to our bilateral defence and security relationship with the US. At the moment the Royal Navy has 41 personnel permanently deployed in Diego Garcia, with a capacity to surge that for contingent operations in the wider region from 2021. That could include a carrier strike task group, should the situation change.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what proportion of the United Kingdom’s Armed Forces will be deployed east of Suez, in the light of the Foreign Secretary’s speech in New Delhi on 18 January.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what proportion of the United Kingdom’s Armed Forces will be deployed east of Suez, in the light of the Foreign Secretary’s speech in New Delhi on 18 January.
My Lords, a significant proportion of the UK’s Armed Forces are deployed in the Gulf. As the Prime Minister said last December, Gulf security is our security. This figure fluctuates according to operational demand. However, with the advent of major exercise programmes, British defence staff in Dubai, the regional land training hub in Oman and the UK naval facility in Bahrain, we will have the permanence and presence to deepen our partnerships in the region.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many United Kingdom-based UK Border Agency staff work outside the United Kingdom; and in which countries.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many United Kingdom-based UK Border Agency staff work outside the United Kingdom; and in which countries.
| Countries (2) | United Kingdom based UK Border Agency staff working outside the UK |
| France | 965 |
| India | 76 |
| Nigeria | 68 |
| United Arab Emirates | 43 |
| Belgium | 36 |
| China | 39 |
| South Africa | 25 |
| Philippines | 23 |
| Russian Federation | 21 |
| Ghana | 23 |
| Pakistan | 17 |
| Bangladesh | 12 |
| Jamaica | 10 |
| Kenya | 10 |
| Turkey | 10 |
| Egypt | 8 |
| Thailand | 8 |
| Poland | 6 |
| Total of employees in countries with 5 or fewer posted UK staff (3). | 101 |
| Total | 1,501 |
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many personnel from the Jersey Territorial Army Unit have served on operational deployments with British forces since 1999; where they have served; and for what periods.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many personnel from the Jersey Territorial Army Unit have served on operational deployments with British forces since 1999; where they have served; and for what periods.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many staff of the UK Border Agency are posted abroad; and in which countries.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many staff of the UK Border Agency are posted abroad; and in which countries.
| Country | UK Based, posted abroad as at 1 April 2009 | Locally Engaged | Total |
| Albania | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Algeria | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Angola | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Argentina | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Armenia | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Australia | 1 | 29 | 30 |
| Austria | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Azerbaijan | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Bangladesh | 12 | 56 | 68 |
| Barbados | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Belarus | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Belgium | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Belize | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Bolivia | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Bosnia and Herzegovinia | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Botswana | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Brazil | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| Brunei | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Bulgaria | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Burma | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Cambodia | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Canada | 4 | 11 | 15 |
| Chile | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| China | 47 | 92 | 139 |
| Colombia | 4 | 10 | 14 |
| Congo (Dem. Rep.) | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Croatia | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Cuba | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Cyprus | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Czech Republic | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Denmark | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Egypt | 12 | 10 | 22 |
| Eritrea | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Estonia | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ethiopia | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| Fiji | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Finland | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| France | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Gambia, The | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| Georgia | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Germany | 2 | 17 | 19 |
| Ghana | 16 | 31 | 47 |
| Greece | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Guyana | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Hungary | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Iceland | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| India | 73 | 213 | 286 |
| Indonesia | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| Iran | 5 | 21 | 26 |
| Iraq | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Irish Republic | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Israel | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| Italy | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Jamaica | 8 | 16 | 24 |
| Japan | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Jordan | 6 | 11 | 17 |
| Kazakhstan | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Kenya | 11 | 25 | 36 |
| Korea | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Kuwait | 5 | 9 | 14 |
| Latvia | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lebanon | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Libya | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| Lithuania | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Macedonia | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Malawi | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Malaysia | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| Malta | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mauritius | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Mexico | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Moldova | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Mongolia | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Montenegro | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Morocco | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Mozambique | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Namibia | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nepal | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Nigeria | 66 | 132 | 198 |
| North Korea | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Norway | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Oman | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Pakistan | 29 | 126 | 155 |
| Panama | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Papua New Guinea | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Peru | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Philippines | 15 | 26 | 41 |
| Poland | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| Portugal | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Qatar | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Romania | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| Russian Federation | 22 | 40 | 62 |
| Rwanda | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Saint Lucia | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| Senegal | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Seychelles | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sierra Leone | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Singapore | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Slovakia | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| South Africa | 17 | 35 | 52 |
| Spain | 3 | 12 | 15 |
| Sri Lanka | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| Sudan | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Sweden | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Syria . | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Taiwan (China) | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Tajikistan | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Tanzania | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Thailand | 11 | 24 | 35 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Tunisia | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Turkey | 17 | 35 | 52 |
| Turkmenistan | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Uganda | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Ukraine | 6 | 12 | 18 |
| United Arab Emirates | 23 | 56 | 79 |
| United States | 7 | 68 | 75 |
| Unknown | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Uruguay | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Uzbekistan | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Venezuela | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Vietnam | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Yemen | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Yugoslavia | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| Zambia | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Zimbabwe | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| 629 | 1507 | 2136 |
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the United Kingdom's commitment to participate in the United States missile defence system, and to the implications of recent negotiations between the United States and other states for the deployment of that system. Motion withdrawn.
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the United Kingdom's commitment to participate in the United States missile defence system, and to the implications of recent negotiations between the United States and other states for the deployment of that system. Motion withdrawn.
Whether troops from other states, including states within the Commonwealth, have mounted guard at Buckingham Palace; if so, when; and which states were involved. [HL 3907].
Whether troops from other states, including states within the Commonwealth, have mounted guard at Buckingham Palace; if so, when; and which states were involved. [HL 3907].