Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:Legislation

Primary member X
Winterton, Nicholas

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More
Winterton, Nicholas (10)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

We were all taken aback by that brief and succinct, but positive, reply. I support the hon. Member for Nottingham, North (Mr. Allen). If we had more pre-legislative scrutiny, the nonsense of programming nowadays, whereby much legislation goes through without important parts being adequately debated either in Standing Committee or at remaining stages, would be removed, and the House would be a better place and legislation would be better for the people of this country.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
443 c124-5
House
House of Commons

To ask the Leader of the House if he will review the procedures for the programming of legislation.

Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 October 2005
Reference
18512; 437 c882W;437 c859-60W
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on post-legislative scrutiny and responsibility of select committees.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2004
Reference
416 c669
House
House of Commons
To ask the President of the Council, What assessment he has made of the impact of the House's new sitting hours on scrutiny of Government business.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
President of the Council
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2003
Reference
401 c161-2; 101898
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
President of the Council
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2003
Reference
401 c161-2
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of the application of the principles of Pepper v. Hart to ministerial comments (a) in the Official Report, (b) in Ministerial correspondence and (c) outside the House. - (Holding answer 30 January 1997).

Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 1997
Reference
13599; 289 c469W
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the introduction of the Olympic Symbol Etc (Protection) Bill, which seeks to protect the Olympic Symbol from unauthorised commercial exploitation; welcomes the support given to the introduction of the Bill both by the Minister for Sport and the Opposition sports spokesman; and looks forward to the...

Primary sponsor
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
15 December 1994
Reference
296
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the announcement by the Minister for Industry that in future an assessment of impact upon the international competitiveness of British businesses, particularly small businesses, will precede any future regulations brought forward by Government; believes that this commitment will be a great boost to British companies and...

Primary sponsor
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
22 July 1993
Reference
2386
House
House of Commons
What recent discussions the Crown prosecution service has had with the obscene publications squad of the Metropolitan police on its prosecutions policy in relation to the Obscene Publications Act 1959 & related legislation.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
26 April 1993
Reference
223 c722;223 c720
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 April 1993
Reference
223 c722;223 c720
House
House of Commons