1-20 of 76 results for subject:Liability
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.289 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Liability
- We searched for
- subject_t:Liability OR subject_t:"Duty of care" OR subject_ses:91832
Session
X
1989-90
Type
House
Session
More
1989-90 (76)
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Answered by
Baroness Blatch
(Conservative)
Asked by
Earl of Selkirk
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
At what point does liability for community charge arise when residential property is under repair to make it fit for human consumption
Subjects
Buildings; Community charge; Liability; Repairs and maintenance
Date
29 October 1990
Reference
522 c1764
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
At what point does liability for community charge arise when residential property is under repair to make it fit for human consumption
At what point does liability for community charge arise when residential property is under repair to make it fit for human consumption
Asked by
Earl of Selkirk
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Blatch
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
29 October 1990
Answered on
29 October 1990
Subjects
Buildings; Community charge; Liability; Repairs and maintenance
Date
29 October 1990
Reference
522 c1764
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Earl of Arran
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Kennet
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
What international convention, or, if none, what other agreement, establishes appropriate liability provisions to cover movements of US ships carrying stocks of nerve gas from Federal Republic of Germany through English Channel, that is within either British or French territorial waters & within area of traffic management. - None.
Subjects
Chemical weapons; Liability; Hazardous substances; Treaties; Transport; USA; West Germany; English Channel
Date
26 July 1990
Reference
521 c1793
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Elton
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Whether it is intention, as can be inferred from Inland Revenue Statement of Practice No 4/90, to treat charitable covenants containing a clause to protect covenantors from liability to continue covenanted payment if their income falls below a stated level, as falling outside definition of "a covenanted payment to charity," in Section 660 (3) to Taxes Act; & if so, what will be loss of income to charities generally as a result.
Legislation
Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988
Subjects
Charities; Charitable donations; Deeds of covenant; Liability; Income; Personal income; Tax allowances
Date
26 July 1990
Reference
521 c1791-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether it is intention, as can be inferred from Inland Revenue Statement of Practice No 4/90, to treat charitable covenants containing a clause to protect covenantors from liability to continue covenanted payment if their income falls below a stated level, as falling outside definition of "a covenanted payment to charity," in Section 660 (3) to Taxes Act; & if so, what will be loss of income to charities generally as a result.
Whether it is intention, as can be inferred from Inland Revenue Statement of Practice No 4/90, to treat charitable covenants containing a clause to protect covenantors from liability to continue covenanted payment if their income falls below a stated level, as falling outside definition of "a covenanted payment to charity," in Section 660 (3) to Taxes Act; & if so, what will be loss of income to charities generally as a result.
Asked by
Lord Elton
(Conservative)
Answered by
Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
26 July 1990
Answered on
26 July 1990
Legislation
Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988
Subjects
Charities; Charitable donations; Deeds of covenant; Liability; Income; Personal income; Tax allowances
Date
26 July 1990
Reference
521 c1791-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
What international convention, or, if none, what other agreement, establishes appropriate liability provisions to cover movements of US ships carrying stocks of nerve gas from Federal Republic of Germany through English Channel, that is within either British or French territorial waters & within area of traffic management. - None.
What international convention, or, if none, what other agreement, establishes appropriate liability provisions to cover movements of US ships carrying stocks of nerve gas from Federal Republic of Germany through English Channel, that is within either British or French territorial waters & within area of traffic management. - None.
Asked by
Lord Kennet
(Labour)
Answered by
Earl of Arran
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
26 July 1990
Answered on
26 July 1990
Subjects
Chemical weapons; Liability; Hazardous substances; Treaties; Transport; USA; West Germany; English Channel
Date
26 July 1990
Reference
521 c1793
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Michael Portillo
(Conservative)
Asked by
Bill Michie
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Are there any proposals to change joint & several liability rule included in community charge legislation.
Subjects
Benefits rules; Community charge; Community charge benefits; Women; Liability; Unpaid work
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c460-1;177 c458
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Portillo
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Benefits rules; Community charge; Community charge benefits; Women; Liability; Unpaid work
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c460-1;177 c458
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on special consideration for non-working wives & mothers.
1st supplementary on special consideration for non-working wives & mothers.
Asked by
Bill Michie
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
25 July 1990
Subjects
Benefits rules; Community charge; Community charge benefits; Women; Liability; Unpaid work
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c460-1;177 c458
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Portillo
(Conservative)
Asked by
Keith Mans
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
If there are any plans to limit liability for paying directly towards cost of local government to heads of households only.
Subjects
Liability; Local government finance; Lancashire
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c457;177 c455
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Portillo
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Community charge; Liability
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c461-2;177 c459
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on community charge & joint & several liability.
Supplementary on community charge & joint & several liability.
Asked by
David Nicholson
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
25 July 1990
Subjects
Community charge; Liability
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c461-2;177 c459
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Portillo
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Liability; Local government finance; Lancashire
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c457;177 c455
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on high-spending of Lancashire County Council.
1st supplementary on high-spending of Lancashire County Council.
Asked by
Keith Mans
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
25 July 1990
Subjects
Liability; Local government finance; Lancashire
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c457;177 c455
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Are there any proposals to change joint & several liability rule included in community charge legislation.
Are there any proposals to change joint & several liability rule included in community charge legislation.
Asked by
Bill Michie
(Labour)
Answered by
Michael Portillo
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
25 July 1990
Answered on
25 July 1990
Subjects
Benefits rules; Community charge; Community charge benefits; Women; Liability; Unpaid work
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c460-1;177 c458
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
If there are any plans to limit liability for paying directly towards cost of local government to heads of households only.
If there are any plans to limit liability for paying directly towards cost of local government to heads of households only.
Asked by
Keith Mans
(Conservative)
Answered by
Michael Portillo
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
25 July 1990
Answered on
25 July 1990
Subjects
Liability; Local government finance; Lancashire
Date
25 July 1990
Reference
177 c457;177 c455
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To comment on financial help to Wirral council following clean-up operation of oil which leaked from a Kuwait Petroleum Company tanker on 12 July; & if, following major spillage of oil will set up an inquiry to consider question of responsibility & compensation. - (Holding answer 16 July 1990).
To comment on financial help to Wirral council following clean-up operation of oil which leaked from a Kuwait Petroleum Company tanker on 12 July; & if, following major spillage of oil will set up an inquiry to consider question of responsibility & compensation. - (Holding answer 16 July 1990).
Asked by
Lord Field of Birkenhead
(Labour)
Answered by
David Trippier
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
18 July 1990
Answered on
18 July 1990
Subjects
Compensation; Liability; Equipment; Oil; Local government finance; Pollution; Nature conservation; Pollution control; Rivers; Tankers; Polluter pays principle; Shell UK; Marine Pollution Control Unit; River Mersey; Wirral Council; Kuwaiti Oil Tanker Company
Date
18 July 1990
Reference
176 c567-8W
House
House of Commons
Statement concerning oil spillage on River Mersey on 12 July. - (Holding answer 16 July 1990).
Statement concerning oil spillage on River Mersey on 12 July. - (Holding answer 16 July 1990).
Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
David Trippier
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
18 July 1990
Answered on
18 July 1990
Subjects
Compensation; Liability; Equipment; Oil; Local government finance; Pollution; Nature conservation; Pollution control; Rivers; Tankers; Polluter pays principle; Shell UK; Marine Pollution Control Unit; River Mersey; Wirral Council; Kuwaiti Oil Tanker Company
Date
18 July 1990
Reference
176 c567-8W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Viscount Ullswater
(Crossbench)
Asked by
Lord Kennet
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
If in event of nuclear accident tax-payer is required to endorse liability beyond #25 million even in event of negligence, including culpable negligence, on part of operators; how figure of #25 million was originally arrived at & what it is now in real terms; if figure has been re-examined in light of Chernobyl & if liability limitation applies to whole process of decommissioning nuclear power stations.
Subjects
Compensation; Decommissioning; Accidents; Liability; Nuclear power stations; Negligence; Chernobyl
Date
17 July 1990
Reference
521 c855-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
If in event of nuclear accident tax-payer is required to endorse liability beyond #25 million even in event of negligence, including culpable negligence, on part of operators; how figure of #25 million was originally arrived at & what it is now in real terms; if figure has been re-examined in light of Chernobyl & if liability limitation applies to whole process of decommissioning nuclear power stations.
If in event of nuclear accident tax-payer is required to endorse liability beyond #25 million even in event of negligence, including culpable negligence, on part of operators; how figure of #25 million was originally arrived at & what it is now in real terms; if figure has been re-examined in light of Chernobyl & if liability limitation applies to whole process of decommissioning nuclear power stations.
Asked by
Lord Kennet
(Labour)
Answered by
Viscount Ullswater
(Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
17 July 1990
Answered on
17 July 1990
Subjects
Compensation; Decommissioning; Accidents; Liability; Nuclear power stations; Negligence; Chernobyl
Date
17 July 1990
Reference
521 c855-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords