Skip to main content

1-20 of 67 results for subject:Extradition

Session X
1993-94

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

SI 1994/2796 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 12 December 1994.

Department
Privy Council
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
14 November 1994
Reference
SI 1994/2796
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 1994/2794 (Negative instrument). Coming into force on date on which Convention on Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances enters into force in respect of Territories specified in part II of Schedule to this order.

Department
Privy Council
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
14 November 1994
Reference
SI 1994/2794
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

On what dates and to what extent representations were made to the Irish Attorney General about the delay in responding to the RUC's warrant for the extradition of Brendan Smyth; what reasons were offered.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 1994
Reference
248 c925W;248 c926-7W
House
House of Commons

How long it took to effect the extradition of Brendan Smyth from the Irish Republic following the consideration of the RUC's request in the appropriate Irish court.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 1994
Reference
248 c925W;248 c927W
House
House of Commons

How long the Attorney General of the Irish Republic took to initiate the appropriate judicial and courts process in response to the RUC's extradition warrant for Brendan Smyth. - Ref to previous answers at 248 c925W.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 1994
Reference
248 c925W;248 c927W
House
House of Commons

What progress has been made since July in respect of returning to British jurisdiction, fugitives from justice resident in Turkish-occupied Cyprus.

Asked by
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 1994
Reference
248 c938W;248 c940W
House
House of Commons
Notes
Received 19.10.94
Date
19 October 1994
Reference
Cm 2668;Treaty 49 (1994)
House
House of Commons

What discussions his Department has had and with whom regarding the return to the United Kingdom of Mr Asil Nadir.

Asked by
Tom Cox (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 1994
Reference
247 c131W;247 c132W
House
House of Commons

On how many occasions in the last 30 years the Home Secretary has refused a request by the United State for extradition from the United Kingdom.

Asked by
Roger Moate (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 1994
Reference
247 c173W;247 c175W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Lords papers
Notes
Received 18.07.94
Date
18 July 1994
Reference
HL 76 1993/94
House
House of Lords

On how many occasions in the last 30 years (a) the United States Government has applied for the extradition of individuals from the United Kingdom and (b) the United Kingdom has applied to the United States extradition of individuals to face charges in the United Kingdom; and how many of...

Asked by
Roger Moate (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 1994
Reference
246 c413W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 244 c398W, who was the person from the Attorney General's Department who attended the meeting; and in what capacity and on what basis each of the persons at the meeting were present.

Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 1994
Reference
246 c424W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 244 c398W if he will list each account of the meeting or of matters arising at the meeting which were transmitted to (a) the Foreign Office in London, (b) the United Kingdom High Commissioner in Malaysia and (c) other Government departments.

Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 1994
Reference
246 c424W;246 c423-4W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 244 c397-8W if he will list each occasion on which the minutes of the meeting on 17th January 1985 as recorded by the Hong Kong side have been made subject to a public interest immunity certificate.

Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 1994
Reference
246 c424W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 244 c398W, if FCO will list the files taken to the meeting on 17 January 1985 by the late Sir John Brembridge. - I understand that no files or papers were taken to the meeting by the late Sir John Brembridge.

Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 1994
Reference
246 c425W;246 c424-5W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 244 c398W what is the present relationship between Mr Chooi Mun Sou and the Hong Kong Government; when and by which officials this relationship was commenced; and how much money has been paid to him and his company, by the Hong Kong Government.

Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 1994
Reference
246 c424W
House
House of Commons

Supplementary business question on EDM 1411 on proposed extradition of Sally Croft and Susan Hagan to the United States.

Member
Roger Moate (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
7 July 1994
Reference
246 c456
House
House of Commons
Member
Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 1994
Reference
246 c456
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 245 c178W, if he will propose that regulations with Switzerland on bilateral agreements include extradition for tax evasion.

Asked by
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 1994
Reference
245 c685W;245 c681-2W
House
House of Commons

That this House recognises the importance of the fullest co-operation with the United States of America in matters of extradition; is concerned however that in the case of Sally Crost and Susan Hagan, the offence for which they have been charged is supposed to have taken place in Oregon in...

Primary sponsor
Roger Moate (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
28 June 1994
Reference
1411
House
House of Commons