1-16 of 16 results for subject:M25
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.263 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:M25
- We searched for
- subject_t:M25 OR subject_ses:289702
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
When he will announce his decision on proposals to widen the M25 between Junctions 12 and 15. - Includes fact that my RtHonFriend has decided that the proposals for widening the M25 between junctions 12 and 15 should go ahead. A copy of the decision letter in the Library.
When he will announce his decision on proposals to widen the M25 between Junctions 12 and 15. - Includes fact that my RtHonFriend has decided that the proposals for widening the M25 between junctions 12 and 15 should go ahead. A copy of the decision letter in the Library.
That this House is dismayed at the difference in the reply given to the honourable Member for Thurrock by the Minister of State for Transport on 17th March in respect of the Department's justification for the proposed widening of the M25 between junctions 12 and 15 and the evidence given to Mr Roy Vandermeer, the Inspector of the Inquiry into Heathrow Terminal 5, by Mr T Dockerty on 27th February 1997 when, following the Inspector asking if 'Terminal 5 depends not merely upon the spur but upon a widened M25' Mr Dockerty replied 'Yes, I think that is the Department's position, Sir, yes'; considers that it is now encumbent upon the Secretary of State to clarify both to the Inquiry and the honourable Member for Thurrock how these two apparently irreconcilable statements can be glibly given to a statutory inquiry and to Parliament; and concludes that this is further evidence of the Department's duplicity and doublespeak.
That this House is dismayed at the difference in the reply given to the honourable Member for Thurrock by the Minister of State for Transport on 17th March in respect of the Department's justification for the proposed widening of the M25 between junctions 12 and 15 and the evidence given...
If he will comment on his Department's evidence to the Heathrow Terminal 5 Inquiry with particular reference to the advantages of the M25 being widened to D5-6 between junctions 12 and 15.
If he will comment on his Department's evidence to the Heathrow Terminal 5 Inquiry with particular reference to the advantages of the M25 being widened to D5-6 between junctions 12 and 15.
How the Highways Agency will identify those projects that will be delayed or deleted as a consequence of the additional expenditure it will have to meet consequent upon the relaying of the capping and asphalt surfacing replacement between junctions 6 and 8. - Includes text of letter from Lawrie Haynes...
How the Highways Agency will identify those projects that will be delayed or deleted as a consequence of the additional expenditure it will have to meet consequent upon the relaying of the capping and asphalt surfacing replacement between junctions 6 and 8. - Includes text of letter from Lawrie Haynes...
What discussions his Department has had with BAA in the past 18 months relating to the M25's (a) existing and (b) future volume and capacity needs between junctions (i) 12 to 15 and (ii) 15 to 16.
What discussions his Department has had with BAA in the past 18 months relating to the M25's (a) existing and (b) future volume and capacity needs between junctions (i) 12 to 15 and (ii) 15 to 16.
How the error relating to the quality of the capping layer laid between junctions 6 and 8 of the M25 occurred; and when it was discovered; and further questions relating to the necessary engineering work between junctions 6 and 8 of the M25. - Inc text of letter from L...
How the error relating to the quality of the capping layer laid between junctions 6 and 8 of the M25 occurred; and when it was discovered; and further questions relating to the necessary engineering work between junctions 6 and 8 of the M25. - Inc text of letter from L...
What factors underlay his assessment that his objectives for junctions 16 to 19 of the M25 could be met by smaller scale improvements than full D4 widening; and for what reason these criteria did not apply in respect of (a) junctions 12 to 15 and (b) junctions 15 to 16....
What factors underlay his assessment that his objectives for junctions 16 to 19 of the M25 could be met by smaller scale improvements than full D4 widening; and for what reason these criteria did not apply in respect of (a) junctions 12 to 15 and (b) junctions 15 to 16....
What factors led him to conclude that the proposed D4 widening of the M25 between junctions 10 to 12 is no longer required.
What factors led him to conclude that the proposed D4 widening of the M25 between junctions 10 to 12 is no longer required.
That this House deplores the fact that the Secretary of State for Transport is still unable or unwilling to announce his response to the 4000-plus objections received last summer to the scheme to widen the M25 to 10-12 lanes between junctions 12 and 15; and believes this adds credibility to the suspicion that, for electoral reasons, the Secretary of State has no intention of making a statement before the General Election.
That this House deplores the fact that the Secretary of State for Transport is still unable or unwilling to announce his response to the 4000-plus objections received last summer to the scheme to widen the M25 to 10-12 lanes between junctions 12 and 15; and believes this adds credibility to...
What contracts have been let in respect of works relating to, or implementing the proposal to widen the M25 to 10 and 12 lanes between junctions 12 and 15; and further questions relating to the proposals and objections to them.
What contracts have been let in respect of works relating to, or implementing the proposal to widen the M25 to 10 and 12 lanes between junctions 12 and 15; and further questions relating to the proposals and objections to them.
When he expects to commence the upgrading of the primary route road signs within the M25; and what projections he has made as to the cost of the programme. - Text of letter from Lawrie Haynes of Highways Agency. Includes figures.
When he expects to commence the upgrading of the primary route road signs within the M25; and what projections he has made as to the cost of the programme. - Text of letter from Lawrie Haynes of Highways Agency. Includes figures.
That this House notes the statement by Local Authorities Against Heathrow Terminal 5 that the Department of Transport's plans to widen the M25 between junctions 12 and 15 and to build a T5 spur road fail to meet 79 of its own design standards; deplores the Department's wish to cram the M25 widening within existing highways boundaries to avoid the need for a public inquiry; and calls on the Secretary of State for Transport to announce his response to the 4,000 objections to the M25 scheme.
That this House notes the statement by Local Authorities Against Heathrow Terminal 5 that the Department of Transport's plans to widen the M25 between junctions 12 and 15 and to build a T5 spur road fail to meet 79 of its own design standards; deplores the Department's wish to cram...