1-20 of 45 results for subject:Marriage
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.271 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Marriage
- We searched for
- subject_t:Marriage OR subject_t:"Arranged marriage" OR subject_t:"Equal marriage" OR subject_t:"Gay marriage" OR subject_t:"Marriage and civil partnerships" OR subject_t:"Mixed marriage" OR subject_ses:91939
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, if he will bring forward proposals to amend section 2 of the Regency Act 1937 to clarify the application of the Act to the future HRH Duchess of Cornwall, consequent upon her husband ascending to the throne.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, if he will bring forward proposals to amend section 2 of the Regency Act 1937 to clarify the application of the Act to the future HRH Duchess of Cornwall, consequent upon her husband ascending to the throne.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, pursuant to his Answer of 17th March, Official Report, column 462W, on the Royal Marriage, whether the spouse of HRH the Prince of Wales will be the Princess of Wales consequent on the marriage to be held on 8th April; and...
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, pursuant to his Answer of 17th March, Official Report, column 462W, on the Royal Marriage, whether the spouse of HRH the Prince of Wales will be the Princess of Wales consequent on the marriage to be held on 8th April; and...
Business question on the legal position on the marriage of Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles.
Business question on the legal position on the marriage of Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, whether the proposed marriage of HRH Prince of Wales to Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles is morganatic.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, whether the proposed marriage of HRH Prince of Wales to Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles is morganatic.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, whether it is intended to amend section 6 of the Civil List Act 1952 consequent upon the decision to raise Mrs Camilla Parker-Bowles to the title of HRH the Duchess of Cornwall on her marriage to HRH the Prince of Wales;...
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, whether it is intended to amend section 6 of the Civil List Act 1952 consequent upon the decision to raise Mrs Camilla Parker-Bowles to the title of HRH the Duchess of Cornwall on her marriage to HRH the Prince of Wales;...
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, if he will publish as a Command Paper documents held in the Public Record Office and other public archives relating to Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin's advice and reasons for refusing Edward VIII's request for a morganatic marriage.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, if he will publish as a Command Paper documents held in the Public Record Office and other public archives relating to Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin's advice and reasons for refusing Edward VIII's request for a morganatic marriage.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, where and how it is proposed to convene a meeting of the Privy Council in compliance with the provisions of the Royal Marriages Act 1972; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, where and how it is proposed to convene a meeting of the Privy Council in compliance with the provisions of the Royal Marriages Act 1972; and if he will make a statement.
That this House notes the wording of the preamble of the Statute of Westminster 1931, which declares `that any alteration in the law touching the Succession to the Throne or the Royal Style and Titles shall hereafter require the assent as well as of the Parliaments of all the Dominions as of the Parliament of the United Kingdom', means that any legislation affording His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales a morganatic marriage shall have to be passed identically and simultaneously in parliaments of Canada, Australia and New Zealand, who are specified in the Statute, and that in addition such identical and simultaneous legislation would also have to be passed by the parliaments of all those other sovereign independent states where Her Majesty the Queen is Head of State, namely Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Grenada, Jamaica, Papua New Guinea, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands and Tuvalu.
That this House notes the wording of the preamble of the Statute of Westminster 1931, which declares `that any alteration in the law touching the Succession to the Throne or the Royal Style and Titles shall hereafter require the assent as well as of the Parliaments of all the Dominions...
That this House commends for reading columns 2181 and 2182 of the Official Report of 10th December 1936, which makes it clear that both the Prime Minister and King Edward VIII concluded that it would be necessary for Parliament to pass legislation for a morganatic marriage if the prospective spouse of Edward VIII was not automatically to become Queen; and seeks to establish why, when and by whom this constitutional principle has subsequently been varied.
That this House commends for reading columns 2181 and 2182 of the Official Report of 10th December 1936, which makes it clear that both the Prime Minister and King Edward VIII concluded that it would be necessary for Parliament to pass legislation for a morganatic marriage if the prospective spouse...
That this House considers that the decision of the Post Office to issue special stamps to commemorate a morganatic marriage is inappropriate.
That this House considers that the decision of the Post Office to issue special stamps to commemorate a morganatic marriage is inappropriate.
SR 2005/559 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 April 2005 for rules 1, 3(b), 16 to 19, 25 and 26 and all others on 4 April 2005.
SR 2005/559 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 April 2005 for rules 1, 3(b), 16 to 19, 25 and 26 and all others on 4 April 2005.
Royal marriages (freedom of religion). Ten minute rule motion for leave to introduce a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 79 2004/05). To be read a second time 8 April.
Royal marriages (freedom of religion). Ten minute rule motion for leave to introduce a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 79 2004/05). To be read a second time 8 April.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what representations he has made to the Israeli authorities on the extension of the Nationality and Entry into Israel Law (Temporary Order) prohibiting residents or citizens of Israel who are married to residents of the Occupied Territories from living...
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what representations he has made to the Israeli authorities on the extension of the Nationality and Entry into Israel Law (Temporary Order) prohibiting residents or citizens of Israel who are married to residents of the Occupied Territories from living...
To ask the Prime Minister, what discussions he has had with (a) the Prime Minister of (i) Canada, (ii) New Zealand and (iii) Australia and (b) other heads of government of countries where Her Majesty the Queen is Head of State about legislating in accordance with the Statute of Westminster...
To ask the Prime Minister, what discussions he has had with (a) the Prime Minister of (i) Canada, (ii) New Zealand and (iii) Australia and (b) other heads of government of countries where Her Majesty the Queen is Head of State about legislating in accordance with the Statute of Westminster...