Skip to main content

1-20 of 174 results for subject:"Deepcut Barracks"

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list those of his Department's documents concerning deaths in Deepcut barracks that have been (a) requested and (b) placed in the public domain under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Asked by
Joan Humble (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
96585; 451 c636-7W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list those documents originating from the Surrey police and concerning deaths in Deepcut barracks that have been (a) requested and (b) placed in the public domain under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Asked by
Joan Humble (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
96586; 451 c133-4W;451 c133W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the Government plans to publish its formal response to Nicholas Blake's Deepcut Review.

Asked by
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
69829; 450 c2014W;450 c2020W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on what date he wrote to the chief constable of Surrey police regarding the disclosure of documents to the families of (a) Sean Benton, (b) Cheryl James and (c) Geoff Gray; if he will copy the letter to the legal representatives of...

Asked by
Joan Humble (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c401W;448 c400W; 79870
House
House of Commons

Whether they intend to review further their response to recommendation 26 (The role of the Commissioner) of the Blake Deepcut review in light of the comments made by Nicholas Blake QC in paragraphs 17 to 21 of his response on 13 June.

Asked by
Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2006
Reference
6436; 683 c123-4WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will review further their response to recommendation 27 (Armed guard duty by soldiers and trainees under 18) of the Blake Deepcut review in light of the concern expressed by Nicholas Blake QC on 13 June that ““the Ministry of Defence’s response leaves unaddressed a recognised area of risk””.

Asked by
Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2006
Reference
6435; 683 c123WA
House
House of Lords

Statement on the government response to the Deepcut review (Cm 6851).

Lead member
Adam Ingram
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c637-53
House
House of Commons
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
Cm 6851
House
House of Commons

I hope I do not get the same admonition, Mr. Speaker. One of the aims that we seek to achieve with the new accommodation blocks is a better spirit of camaraderie. One of the failings of single living accommodation was that it allowed individuals, trained or untrained, to live in...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c649;447 c649-50
House
House of Commons

We must consider what benefits would flow from the proposal. Then there is the question of how many people would be required. Is there a benefit? Possibly. How many would need to be available to deliver it? The instructors are trained soldiers, as we know—

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c649
House
House of Commons

That depends what happens in the other place. I am not the master of that. The fact that the Bill is to be amended means that it will have to come back. I will not go into parliamentary procedure, but I am sure the hon. Gentleman will find an opportunity...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c649
House
House of Commons

On the latter point, was the hon. Gentleman asking when or whether the Bill would come back to the House?

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c649
House
House of Commons

I am sure the Minister will agree that we need fair, robust and disciplined training for our armed forces. When I went through basic training as a 16-year-old soldier, one thing that we had then which we do not have now to address the myriad problems that young people have...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c648-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman and I have worked closely on this matter, but a big gap has appeared, which I regret. Nicholas Blake did not make that point in his report and did not make it a condition, and only he can comment on whether he is satisfied or otherwise with...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c651
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c651
House
House of Commons

I am trying to interpret what the hon. Gentleman has said in the same way in which he interpreted what Mr. Blake has said. If he is saying that putting the complaint back to the chain of command somehow undermines the quality of the decision-making process, I disagree fundamentally, and...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c651
House
House of Commons

Following Deepcut and, perhaps more importantly, the growing separation between the military and the rest of society and the enormous operational commitment now undertaken by the armed forces, the challenge faced by the training establishment in producing the world-class soldiers referred to by my hon. Friend the Member for Woodspring...

Member
Crispin Blunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c651-2
House
House of Commons

I want to preface my remarks to the hon. Member for Woodspring (Dr. Fox)— Forgive me, Mr. Speaker. I will speak to the hon. Member for Woodspring later. I have three quick questions— I have one quick question. I am heartened that the Minister has written to Surrey police, but...

Member
Meg Hillier (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c650
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that my hon. Friend did not get the chance to put all her questions. I am also sorry to hear her comments about Surrey police and suggest that she take up the matter with the relevant Minister. It is a matter of regret that the families have...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c650
House
House of Commons

Nicholas Blake clearly stated that if the Government refuse to establish an independent commissioner of military complaints, then he would call for a full, independent public inquiry into the Deepcut deaths. Is it not obvious that the Government have refused that specific recommendation and that years of co-operation and patience...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c650-1
House
House of Commons