1-20 of 174 results for subject:"Deepcut Barracks"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.287 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Deepcut Barracks"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Deepcut Barracks" OR subject_t:"Deep Cut Army Camp" OR subject_t:Deepcut OR subject_t:"Princess Royal Barracks" OR subject_ses:12261
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list those of his Department's documents concerning deaths in Deepcut barracks that have been (a) requested and (b) placed in the public domain under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list those of his Department's documents concerning deaths in Deepcut barracks that have been (a) requested and (b) placed in the public domain under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
| Request | Applicant | Response |
| Information on specified deceased soldier; | Four families of deceased | Documents provided |
| Personal Document File; | ||
| Casualty File; | ||
| Mental and Dental records | ||
| Information on all four deceased soldiers: | Journalist | Declined: Article 8 of Human Rights Act (right to privacy and private life) and Health Records Act 1990 |
| Personal Document File; | ||
| Casualty File; | ||
| Mental and Dental records | ||
| Correspondence concerning the four deaths, including: | Journalist | Declined |
| correspondence generated by each Service Police investigation; | FOI section 12 (cost) | |
| methodology of investigation; | FOI section 30 (investigations and proceedings conducted by public authorities) | |
| correspondence within ATRA; | Section 31 (law enforcement) | |
| correspondence between MOD and Surrey Police | ||
| Relevant files concerning the Service Police handling of death of Pte Cheryl James | Father | Declined: FOI sections 30 & 31 |
| All records relating to deaths at Deepcut Barracks | Clarification of requirement requested, but applicant failed to respond |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list those documents originating from the Surrey police and concerning deaths in Deepcut barracks that have been (a) requested and (b) placed in the public domain under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list those documents originating from the Surrey police and concerning deaths in Deepcut barracks that have been (a) requested and (b) placed in the public domain under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the Government plans to publish its formal response to Nicholas Blake's Deepcut Review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the Government plans to publish its formal response to Nicholas Blake's Deepcut Review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on what date he wrote to the chief constable of Surrey police regarding the disclosure of documents to the families of (a) Sean Benton, (b) Cheryl James and (c) Geoff Gray; if he will copy the letter to the legal representatives of...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on what date he wrote to the chief constable of Surrey police regarding the disclosure of documents to the families of (a) Sean Benton, (b) Cheryl James and (c) Geoff Gray; if he will copy the letter to the legal representatives of...
Whether they intend to review further their response to recommendation 26 (The role of the Commissioner) of the Blake Deepcut review in light of the comments made by Nicholas Blake QC in paragraphs 17 to 21 of his response on 13 June.
Whether they intend to review further their response to recommendation 26 (The role of the Commissioner) of the Blake Deepcut review in light of the comments made by Nicholas Blake QC in paragraphs 17 to 21 of his response on 13 June.
Whether they will review further their response to recommendation 27 (Armed guard duty by soldiers and trainees under 18) of the Blake Deepcut review in light of the concern expressed by Nicholas Blake QC on 13 June that ““the Ministry of Defence’s response leaves unaddressed a recognised area of risk””.
Whether they will review further their response to recommendation 27 (Armed guard duty by soldiers and trainees under 18) of the Blake Deepcut review in light of the concern expressed by Nicholas Blake QC on 13 June that ““the Ministry of Defence’s response leaves unaddressed a recognised area of risk””.
Statement on the government response to the Deepcut review (Cm 6851).
Statement on the government response to the Deepcut review (Cm 6851).
I hope I do not get the same admonition, Mr. Speaker. One of the aims that we seek to achieve with the new accommodation blocks is a better spirit of camaraderie. One of the failings of single living accommodation was that it allowed individuals, trained or untrained, to live in...
I hope I do not get the same admonition, Mr. Speaker. One of the aims that we seek to achieve with the new accommodation blocks is a better spirit of camaraderie. One of the failings of single living accommodation was that it allowed individuals, trained or untrained, to live in...
We must consider what benefits would flow from the proposal. Then there is the question of how many people would be required. Is there a benefit? Possibly. How many would need to be available to deliver it? The instructors are trained soldiers, as we know—
We must consider what benefits would flow from the proposal. Then there is the question of how many people would be required. Is there a benefit? Possibly. How many would need to be available to deliver it? The instructors are trained soldiers, as we know—
That depends what happens in the other place. I am not the master of that. The fact that the Bill is to be amended means that it will have to come back. I will not go into parliamentary procedure, but I am sure the hon. Gentleman will find an opportunity...
That depends what happens in the other place. I am not the master of that. The fact that the Bill is to be amended means that it will have to come back. I will not go into parliamentary procedure, but I am sure the hon. Gentleman will find an opportunity...
On the latter point, was the hon. Gentleman asking when or whether the Bill would come back to the House?
On the latter point, was the hon. Gentleman asking when or whether the Bill would come back to the House?
I am sure the Minister will agree that we need fair, robust and disciplined training for our armed forces. When I went through basic training as a 16-year-old soldier, one thing that we had then which we do not have now to address the myriad problems that young people have...
I am sure the Minister will agree that we need fair, robust and disciplined training for our armed forces. When I went through basic training as a 16-year-old soldier, one thing that we had then which we do not have now to address the myriad problems that young people have...
The hon. Gentleman and I have worked closely on this matter, but a big gap has appeared, which I regret. Nicholas Blake did not make that point in his report and did not make it a condition, and only he can comment on whether he is satisfied or otherwise with...
The hon. Gentleman and I have worked closely on this matter, but a big gap has appeared, which I regret. Nicholas Blake did not make that point in his report and did not make it a condition, and only he can comment on whether he is satisfied or otherwise with...
indicated dissent.
indicated dissent.
I am trying to interpret what the hon. Gentleman has said in the same way in which he interpreted what Mr. Blake has said. If he is saying that putting the complaint back to the chain of command somehow undermines the quality of the decision-making process, I disagree fundamentally, and...
I am trying to interpret what the hon. Gentleman has said in the same way in which he interpreted what Mr. Blake has said. If he is saying that putting the complaint back to the chain of command somehow undermines the quality of the decision-making process, I disagree fundamentally, and...
Following Deepcut and, perhaps more importantly, the growing separation between the military and the rest of society and the enormous operational commitment now undertaken by the armed forces, the challenge faced by the training establishment in producing the world-class soldiers referred to by my hon. Friend the Member for Woodspring...
Following Deepcut and, perhaps more importantly, the growing separation between the military and the rest of society and the enormous operational commitment now undertaken by the armed forces, the challenge faced by the training establishment in producing the world-class soldiers referred to by my hon. Friend the Member for Woodspring...
I want to preface my remarks to the hon. Member for Woodspring (Dr. Fox)— Forgive me, Mr. Speaker. I will speak to the hon. Member for Woodspring later. I have three quick questions— I have one quick question. I am heartened that the Minister has written to Surrey police, but...
I want to preface my remarks to the hon. Member for Woodspring (Dr. Fox)— Forgive me, Mr. Speaker. I will speak to the hon. Member for Woodspring later. I have three quick questions— I have one quick question. I am heartened that the Minister has written to Surrey police, but...
I am sorry that my hon. Friend did not get the chance to put all her questions. I am also sorry to hear her comments about Surrey police and suggest that she take up the matter with the relevant Minister. It is a matter of regret that the families have...
I am sorry that my hon. Friend did not get the chance to put all her questions. I am also sorry to hear her comments about Surrey police and suggest that she take up the matter with the relevant Minister. It is a matter of regret that the families have...
Nicholas Blake clearly stated that if the Government refuse to establish an independent commissioner of military complaints, then he would call for a full, independent public inquiry into the Deepcut deaths. Is it not obvious that the Government have refused that specific recommendation and that years of co-operation and patience...
Nicholas Blake clearly stated that if the Government refuse to establish an independent commissioner of military complaints, then he would call for a full, independent public inquiry into the Deepcut deaths. Is it not obvious that the Government have refused that specific recommendation and that years of co-operation and patience...