1-14 of 14 results for subject:AWE
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.195 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:AWE
- We searched for
- subject_t:AWE OR subject_t:"Atomic Weapons Establishment" OR subject_t:"AWE Management" OR subject_t:"AWE plc" OR subject_ses:2767
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many (a) scientists, (b) engineers and (c) technicians the Atomic Weapons Establishment is planning to hire over the next five years; and in what areas of expertise.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many (a) scientists, (b) engineers and (c) technicians the Atomic Weapons Establishment is planning to hire over the next five years; and in what areas of expertise.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Atomic Weapons Establishment is considering new hydrodynamic testing facilities.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Atomic Weapons Establishment is considering new hydrodynamic testing facilities.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Atomic Weapons Establishment has conducted studies of the use of hydrodynamic test facilities for maintaining the security and reliability of the UK nuclear deterrent.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Atomic Weapons Establishment has conducted studies of the use of hydrodynamic test facilities for maintaining the security and reliability of the UK nuclear deterrent.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Atomic Weapons Establishment (a) has conducted and (b) is conducting studies of a hydrodynamic testing facility involving fix x-ray machines.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Atomic Weapons Establishment (a) has conducted and (b) is conducting studies of a hydrodynamic testing facility involving fix x-ray machines.
Public petition from residents in Southend and elsewhere for action to prevent the disposal of radioactive waste on Foulness and ensure that this does not occur at any time in the future. (Circulated with the Vote 25 July 2006)
Public petition from residents in Southend and elsewhere for action to prevent the disposal of radioactive waste on Foulness and ensure that this does not occur at any time in the future. (Circulated with the Vote 25 July 2006)
I present a petition concerning the disposal of radioactive waste on Foulness island. The petitionhas led to a constructive dialogue between myself,the Ministry of Defence, the Atomic Weapons Establishment, the Environment Agency and Qinetiq. The petition has over 700 signatures and was completed with the support of the Southend Echo....
I present a petition concerning the disposal of radioactive waste on Foulness island. The petitionhas led to a constructive dialogue between myself,the Ministry of Defence, the Atomic Weapons Establishment, the Environment Agency and Qinetiq. The petition has over 700 signatures and was completed with the support of the Southend Echo....
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the budget for the Atomic Weapons Establishment was in each of the last 20 years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the budget for the Atomic Weapons Establishment was in each of the last 20 years.
| Atomic Weapons Establishment annual expenditure (as at 31 March 2006, 2005-06 prices) | |
|---|---|
| £ million | |
| 1993-94 | 299 |
| 1994-95 | 383 |
| 1995-96 | 387 |
| 1996-97 | 340 |
| 1997-98 | 367 |
| 1998-99 | 336 |
| 1999-2000 | 331 |
| 2000-01 | 311 |
| 2001-02 | 291 |
| 2002-03 | 278 |
| 2003-04 | 300 |
| 2004-05 | 363 |
| 2005-06 (Provisional) | 493 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the basis was for the decision to choose the Atomic Weapons Establishment to provide the warheads for the UK's nuclear deterrent; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the basis was for the decision to choose the Atomic Weapons Establishment to provide the warheads for the UK's nuclear deterrent; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the balance sheet value of the Atomic Weapons Establishment was on 31 March; what the (a) carrying charge and (b) applicable depreciation for that establishment is in the 2005–06 financial year; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the balance sheet value of the Atomic Weapons Establishment was on 31 March; what the (a) carrying charge and (b) applicable depreciation for that establishment is in the 2005–06 financial year; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many and what percentage of the personnel at the Aldermaston Weapons Establishment are (a) US citizens, (b) employed by US corporations and (c) employed by the US Government, broken down by grade.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many and what percentage of the personnel at the Aldermaston Weapons Establishment are (a) US citizens, (b) employed by US corporations and (c) employed by the US Government, broken down by grade.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much the UK Government has paid Atomic Weapons Establishment Management Limited in each of the last 20 years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much the UK Government has paid Atomic Weapons Establishment Management Limited in each of the last 20 years.
| Atomic weapons establishment annual expenditure(as at October 2005, £ million, 2005–06 prices) | |
|---|---|
| £ million | |
| 2000–01 | 311 |
| 2001–02 | 291 |
| 2002–03 | 278 |
| 2003–04 | 300 |
| 2004–05 | 363 |
| 2005–06 | 507 |
| (16) Forecast. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the £1,050,000,000 to be spent over the next three years on upgrading facilities for the Atomic Weapons Establishment will be relevant (a) only to the existing Trident warhead stockpile and (b) also to a future generation of the UK nuclear deterrent.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the £1,050,000,000 to be spent over the next three years on upgrading facilities for the Atomic Weapons Establishment will be relevant (a) only to the existing Trident warhead stockpile and (b) also to a future generation of the UK nuclear deterrent.
The Government made clear last year on 21 July 2004, Official Report, column 348 of their commitment to maintaining the effectiveness and safety of the nuclear deterrent including making the necessary investment in the facilities at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston and Burghfield. To that end agreement has been...
The Government made clear last year on 21 July 2004, Official Report, column 348 of their commitment to maintaining the effectiveness and safety of the nuclear deterrent including making the necessary investment in the facilities at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston and Burghfield. To that end agreement has been...
My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Defence (John Reid) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. The Government made clear last year (Official Report, House of Commons, 21 July 2004, col. 348) their commitment to maintaining the effectiveness and safety of the nuclear deterrent including making the...
My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Defence (John Reid) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. The Government made clear last year (Official Report, House of Commons, 21 July 2004, col. 348) their commitment to maintaining the effectiveness and safety of the nuclear deterrent including making the...