Skip to main content

1-20 of 965 results for subject:Arbitration

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House pays tribute to the work done by police officers in increasingly difficult and dangerous circumstances; is aware that the status of police officers is unique in that they are restricted from taking industrial action; notes that since 1979 police pay has been index-linked according to a formula...

Primary sponsor
Edward O'Hara (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
18 October 2006
Reference
2798
House
House of Commons

We have made it clear that we support the sentiment behind the Bill and therefore we have no problem in supporting the sentiment behind the new clause. In many ways, it is inherently obvious and what it says goes without saying. It could be argued that that raises the question...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1522-3
House
House of Commons

It is important to be clear on that point. My understanding is that the investigation report is the document that would be prepared by the scheme member for the NHS Litigation Authority to use when considering the conduct of the investigation and the issues arising as regards quantum and liability....

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1530-1
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for that, but ask him to re-examine Government amendment No. 11(2B), which says:"““A scheme may provide that no copy of an investigation report need be provided…before an offer is made…in such circumstances as may be specified””." That needs clarification. I think that the Minister is saying...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1531
House
House of Commons

Like all Lib Dem polls.

Member
Simon Burns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1546
House
House of Commons

Can we be absolutely clear about this point? I and other Members have tried to question the Minister on it and we are having a little trouble pinning him down. We all agree that an investigation report will be produced at the end of the fact-finding stage. Can he confirm...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1535
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for listening to the representations made in Committee about the production of an annual report. However, if the report of a particular case is made available to a member of the public—we are all in favour of transparency and openness here—has he considered whether...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1535
House
House of Commons

We were asked to go further in Committee. We have in the Bill a requirement to provide an explanation and an apology if one is deemed appropriate. I argued in Committee that that would ordinarily meet the concerns expressed by the hon. Member for Romsey, because people would receive an...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1537
House
House of Commons

There is a built-in incentive for trusts to settle under the scheme because if they fail to do so, they face the prospect of duplicating effort and going through a further legal battle. The fact that the scheme contains a built-in incentive for trusts to settle will help to build...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1556-7
House
House of Commons

I will give way to the Minister in a moment. The clinician may find himself in that position. The Minister’s suggestion—this is the point to which I would like him to respond—that the clinician will be happy with that, and that it will lead to openness, is absurd.

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1550
House
House of Commons

We have heard a very powerful speech that goes to the heart of the issue, which is the patient experience. It is not possible for the House to focus too much on the position of someone who has been wronged by the system and has a great sense of grievance....

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1549
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that openness and independence are essential to gain confidence in the community and to provide a major protection for the excellent members of the NHS?

Member
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1548
House
House of Commons

No. Hardly anybody gave way to me in Committee or this afternoon, so I will just make my brief remarks and sit down. I spoke more than once on Second Reading and in Committee about different ways in which the Bill could have been dealt with from the beginning and...

Member
Sion Simon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1574
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1574
House
House of Commons

I shall not keep the Whips from their tea for more than a few moments but I cannot resist telling the Minister that he is in danger of making me change one of my after-dinner speeches. My limited experience of Standing Committees has been uniformly depressing and frustrating. When I...

Member
Richard Taylor (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1574-5
House
House of Commons

It is with mixed feelings that I rise to speak on Third Reading. We had hoped to support the Bill, which has the worthy aim providing an alternative to going to court for NHS patients seeking redress, but despite some lively and learned debates, both on the Floor of the...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1570-3
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time. I am pleased to be able to send the Bill back to another place, and I hope that their lordships will give it their blessing. Although there remain some differences between ourselves and Opposition Members that we...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1569-70
House
House of Commons

Steady on.

Member
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1573
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak on Third Reading with mixed feelings, because I felt at many stages during the Bill’s progress that there was a lot of genuine consensus based on honesty and openness, on trying to ensure that patients could have a means of redress, and on facilitating that in...

Member
Sandra Gidley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1573
House
House of Commons

I am conscious that the Whips want to get home for their tea, so I will resist the temptation to dwell on what Opposition Members have said about legal advice, save to say that the whole tone of their remarks was so ill-judged as to be irresponsible and dangerous, and...

Member
Sion Simon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2006
Reference
448 c1573-4
House
House of Commons