Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andy Burnham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on NHS Redress Bill (HL).


NHS Redress Bill [Lords]

We were asked to go further in Committee. We have in the Bill a requirement to provide an explanation and an apology if one is deemed appropriate. I argued in Committee that that would ordinarily meet the concerns expressed by the hon. Member for Romsey, because people would receive an explanation that, for all intents and purposes, would comprise the same information as the report. She pressed me to go further. She said that a report will be compiled, so it is right that the patient should have access to that report. If it is accepted that a case should proceed under the NHS redress scheme, those provisions are laid down in the Bill, so the patient is left in a strong position, and the patient will be in an even stronger position as a result of the amendments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c1537 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Access Disclosure of information Compensation Arbitration Civil proceedings Bureaucracy Annual reports Legal profession Doctors Employment Health services Inquiries Liability Legal costs Legal opinion NHS Patients Publications NHS trusts Staff Negligence Torts
Legislation
NHS Redress Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk