Skip to main content

1-20 of 512 results for subject:Leave

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

May I first associate myself with the Minister’s comments with regard to the two very brave men who lost their lives? Our thoughts and prayers go out to their families and loved ones. Is it true that owing to a lack of RAF capacity as regards transport those who are serving on the front line and wish to come home for leave sometimes have to wait days before they can do? Does it not add insult to injury that those men should have that time deducted from their leave? I should be most grateful for the Minister’s comments.
Asked by
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c2
House
House of Commons

Adjournment debate on compassionate leave for service personnel (case of Corporal Bronwen Pickup)

Lead member
Bill Wiggin
Answering member
Adam Ingram
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
450 c1629-36
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the granting of this Adjournment debate. Although there have been many debates and many questions have been asked relating to defence and the armed forces in recent years, Parliament has only touched on the subject of compassionate leave for service personnel. As such, I hope that...

Member
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
450 c1629-32
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman thinks that Ministers draft every letter, he should get into the real world. Clearly, the system exists to help Ministers, who have ultimate responsibility for what goes out in their name. The Government and the services recognise that welfare is an important and integral element of...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
450 c1633-6
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
450 c1633
House
House of Commons

I welcome the opportunity to debate a narrow but highly important aspect of welfare support for our service personnel and their families. Although I will deal with compassionate leave in particular, it would be useful if I set out the context of the overall welfare support that we provide our...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
450 c1632-3
House
House of Commons

I would have hoped the letter had been drafted by a Minister.

Member
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
450 c1633
House
House of Commons

No. To call someone who drafts a letter for a Minister a ““minion”” is demeaning of the hon. Gentleman, not of the individual who gives support—

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
450 c1633
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many workers at the Immigration and Nationality Directorate (a) are absent from work on full pay and (b) have been for more than one month.

Asked by
Damian Green (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2006
Reference
91252; 450 c501W;450 c505W
House
House of Commons

Work and Families Bill. Programme motion (No 2) on consideration of Lords amendments. Agreed to on question (formal). Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendment considered and agreed to.

Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates on bills
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c657-8
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Minister. We agree. Lords amendment agreed to.

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c658
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, that this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment. The Lords amendment was tabled by the Government to correct a minor drafting error in schedule 1, which amends section 80E of the Employment Rights Act 1996. At paragraph 38, line 32 the schedule currently...

Member
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c658
House
House of Commons

May I take this opportunity to welcome the Minister to his new post and congratulate him on the excellent brevity of his first speech on this subject? May I astound the House by agreeing with him entirely in every word? This is clearly a drafting error. The Bill does not...

Member
Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c658
House
House of Commons

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what criteria staff in his office have to fulfil before they become eligible for fully paid leave.

Asked by
Peter Viggers (Conservative)
Answering body
Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 May 2006
Reference
71293; 446 c983W;446 c984W
House
House of Commons

Work and Families Bill. Queen's Consent signified. Lords third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Bill passed and returned to the Commons with an amendment.

Lead member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Answering member
Baroness Miller of Hendon
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates on bills
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c691-708
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, seeks to make it easier for fathers to take the leave to which they already have an entitlement. I agree wholeheartedly with her comments about the importance of fathers, particularly in those early stages of a baby’s life. On Report, I said:"““One...

Member
Baroness Morris of Bolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c698-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his reply and the noble Baroness, Lady Morris of Bolton, for her comments. It seems to me that the Government are putting businesses before families. I do not believe that it would do families any good if businesses were put under undue pressure and were to...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c701-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, for introducing these amendments and acknowledge that they ameliorate those she produced earlier and are based on agreement with the employer. We have listened to all sides in our consultations and discussions, but, obviously, there is not always agreement particularly on the practicalities....

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c699-701
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 3:"Page 11, line 39, at end insert—" ““(   )   If no regulations phasing the inclusion of Bank Holidays pursuant to subsection (7) have been approved by both Houses of Parliament by 31st December 2008, this section shall expire and be of no further effect.”” The noble Baroness said: My Lords, before I speak to the...

Member
Baroness Miller of Hendon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c702-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have it in command from Her Majesty the Queen to acquaint the House that Her Majesty, having been informed of the purport of the Work and Families Bill, has consented to place her Interests, so far as they are affected by the Bill, at the disposal of Parliament...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
681 c691
House
House of Lords