1-20 of 194 results for subject:Population
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.267 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.014 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Population
- We searched for
- subject_t:Population OR subject_ses:92512
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Does my hon. Friend agree that other areas are also particularly affected in a similar way, such as my constituency? There has been a chronic understating of population figures in my constituency, and a ping-pong debate with the Minister concerning that understatement and the inadequacy of the figures from the...
Does my hon. Friend agree that other areas are also particularly affected in a similar way, such as my constituency? There has been a chronic understating of population figures in my constituency, and a ping-pong debate with the Minister concerning that understatement and the inadequacy of the figures from the...
I am delighted to have been selected to introduce this debate, which will contain some complex statistical matter, although I hope not to test your patience too far, Mr. Jones. The part of west London that I have the privilege to represent has an excellent record of harmonious community relationships....
I am delighted to have been selected to introduce this debate, which will contain some complex statistical matter, although I hope not to test your patience too far, Mr. Jones. The part of west London that I have the privilege to represent has an excellent record of harmonious community relationships....
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I am a strong believer in the contribution that the recent migrants have made to our national economy, but an important point to make on top of my hon. Friend’s point is that most of their contribution—in higher tax revenues and national insurance contributions—goes...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I am a strong believer in the contribution that the recent migrants have made to our national economy, but an important point to make on top of my hon. Friend’s point is that most of their contribution—in higher tax revenues and national insurance contributions—goes...
I thank my hon. Friend for giving way and congratulate him on securing this important debate. Does he agree that there seems to be a disparity in some geographical hot spots throughout the country, both urban and rural, between the economic benefits of mass migration from the EU10 and its...
I thank my hon. Friend for giving way and congratulate him on securing this important debate. Does he agree that there seems to be a disparity in some geographical hot spots throughout the country, both urban and rural, between the economic benefits of mass migration from the EU10 and its...
My hon. Friend is quite right. Others also have the same problem, which is by no means unique to my constituency or local authority. I have spoken with officers in Westminster city council and with London Councils, which used to be known as the Association of London Government. Slough borough...
My hon. Friend is quite right. Others also have the same problem, which is by no means unique to my constituency or local authority. I have spoken with officers in Westminster city council and with London Councils, which used to be known as the Association of London Government. Slough borough...
The hon. Gentleman said in his speech that his authority was not unique—that the problem applied also to Enfield and no doubt to other authorities. Perhaps I may respond to the hon. Gentleman by sending him more information on this important subject. Briefly, there are two points to consider. First,...
The hon. Gentleman said in his speech that his authority was not unique—that the problem applied also to Enfield and no doubt to other authorities. Perhaps I may respond to the hon. Gentleman by sending him more information on this important subject. Briefly, there are two points to consider. First,...
I realise that time is short, but I want to take the Minister back to a point that he made earlier. He said that funding settlements can be altered only in exceptional circumstances. I appreciate what he is saying about the stability provided by projecting forward, which was certainly welcome...
I realise that time is short, but I want to take the Minister back to a point that he made earlier. He said that funding settlements can be altered only in exceptional circumstances. I appreciate what he is saying about the stability provided by projecting forward, which was certainly welcome...
Congratulations are due to the hon. Member for Hammersmith and Fulham (Mr. Hands) on securing this debate, and to the hon. Members for Peterborough (Mr. Jackson) and for Enfield, Southgate (Mr. Burrowes) on their interventions. The debate gives me the opportunity to put on the record the effect of population...
Congratulations are due to the hon. Member for Hammersmith and Fulham (Mr. Hands) on securing this debate, and to the hon. Members for Peterborough (Mr. Jackson) and for Enfield, Southgate (Mr. Burrowes) on their interventions. The debate gives me the opportunity to put on the record the effect of population...
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the effects of population growth between censuses on local government finance.
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the effects of population growth between censuses on local government finance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether a race equality impact assessment was undertaken on the decision to use current methodology for population projections in the local government funding system.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether a race equality impact assessment was undertaken on the decision to use current methodology for population projections in the local government funding system.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the life expectancy is of (a) men and (b) women in (i) the East Midlands and (ii) the South East; and what it was in (1) 1996 and (2) 2000 in each case.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the life expectancy is of (a) men and (b) women in (i) the East Midlands and (ii) the South East; and what it was in (1) 1996 and (2) 2000 in each case.
| Table 1: Period life expectancy at birth¹, East Midlands and South East Government office regions²,1995-97,1999-2001 and 2002-04³ | ||||
| Years of life | ||||
| Male | Female | |||
| Year³ | Life expectancy | 95 percent confidence interval4 | Life expectancy | 95 percent confidence interval4 |
| East Midlands | ||||
| 1995-97 | 74.8 | (74.7-74.9) | 79.7 | (79.6-79.8) |
| 1999-2001 | 75.7 | (75.6-75.8) | 80.3 | (80.2-80.4) |
| 2002-04 | 76.5 | (76.4-76.6) | 80.7 | (80.6-80.8) |
| South East | ||||
| 1995-97 | 75.8 | (75.7-75.9) | 80.5 | (80.4-80.6) |
| 1999-2001 | 76.9 | (76.9-77.0) | 81.3 | (81.2-81.4) |
| 2002-04 | 777 | (77.7-77.8) | 81.8 | (81.7-81.9) |
| ¹ Period life expectancy at birth is an estimate of the average number of years a newborn baby would survive if he or she experienced the area’s age-specific mortality rates for that time period throughout his or her life. The figure reflects mortality among those living in the area in each time period, rather than mortality among those born in each area. It is not therefore the number of years a baby born in the area in each time period could actually expect to live, both because the death rates of the area are likely to change in the future and because many of those born in the area will live elsewhere for at least some part of their lives. ² Using boundaries as of 2005 for all the years shown. ³ Three year rolling averages, based on deaths registered in each year and mid-year population estimates. 4 Confidence intervals are a measure of the statistical precision of an estimate and show the range of uncertainty around the estimated figure. Calculations based on small numbers of events are often subject to random fluctuations. As a general rule, if the confidence interval around one figure overlaps with the interval around another, we cannot say with certainty that there is more than a chance difference between the two figures. |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of the population of (a) England, (b) Surrey, (c) Reigate constituency and (d) the borough of Reigate and Banstead is aged over 65 years.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of the population of (a) England, (b) Surrey, (c) Reigate constituency and (d) the borough of Reigate and Banstead is aged over 65 years.
| Table 1: Total population and percentage of population of those aged 65 and over Mid-2005 population estimate | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Local Authority | Total population | Population aged 65+ | Percentage population aged 65+ |
| England | 50,431 | 8,058,100 | 16.0 |
| Surrey | 1,075,500 | 176,900 | 16.4 |
| Borough of Reigate and Banstead | 127,200 | 20,700 | 16.3 |
| Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest 100. Source: | |||
| Office for National Statistics |
| Table 2: Total population and percentage of population of those aged 65 and over, based on the 2001 Census | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parliamentary constituency | Total population | Population aged 65+ | Percentage population aged 65+ |
| Reigate constituency | 87,665 | 14,569 | 16.6 |
| Note: The data have been taken from KS02 in the Census 2001 Report for Parliamentary Constituencies which is available in the House of Commons Library. Source: Office for National Statistics. |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the mid year estimates made in (a) 2003, (b) 2004 and (c) 2005 were of the population in the city of Newcastle upon Tyne; and what the estimates of future population were for each year.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the mid year estimates made in (a) 2003, (b) 2004 and (c) 2005 were of the population in the city of Newcastle upon Tyne; and what the estimates of future population were for each year.
| Table 1: Mid-2003 to mid-2005 population estimates and mid-2006 to mid-2025 population projections (2004-based) | |
|---|---|
| Thousand | |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | |
| Population estimates | |
| Mid-2003 | 266.6 |
| Mid-2004 | 269.5 |
| Mid-2005 | 276.4 |
| Population projections¹ | |
| Mid-2006 | 273.3 |
| Mid-2007 | 274.5 |
| Mid-2008 | 275.4 |
| Mid-2009 | 276.3 |
| Mid-2010 | 277.2 |
| Mid-2015 | 280.8 |
| Mid-2020 | 283.9 |
| Mid-2025 | 287.5 |
| ¹ The population projections shown in this table are taken from the 2004-based subnational population projections, the latest set of projections currently available. Therefore they are not consistent with the 2005 mid year estimates and there is a discontinuity in the series as presented between years 2005 and 2006. Source: Office for National Statistics |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how much has been spent on the Improving Migration Population Statistics programme each year since the 2001 census, broken down by main budget heading;
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how much has been spent on the Improving Migration Population Statistics programme each year since the 2001 census, broken down by main budget heading;
| £000 | |||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 (planned) | |
| IMPS research | 442 | 541 | 508 |
| Migration | 166 | 283 | 429 |
| Population definitions | 62 | 85 | 119 |
| Total | 670 | 909 | 1056 |
(2) how much was spent on the Office for National Statistics’ Task Group to investigate migration using central data sources, broken down by main budget heading.
(2) how much was spent on the Office for National Statistics’ Task Group to investigate migration using central data sources, broken down by main budget heading.
| £000 | |||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 (planned) | |
| IMPS research | 442 | 541 | 508 |
| Migration | 166 | 283 | 429 |
| Population definitions | 62 | 85 | 119 |
| Total | 670 | 909 | 1056 |
Draft SI on national assembly for wales (transfer of functions) (no 2) (Affirmative instrument). Together with an explanantory memorandum from Wales Office. Approved by Parliament. Made 14 December 2006 (SI 2006/3334) .Coming into force 15 December 2006
Draft SI on national assembly for wales (transfer of functions) (no 2) (Affirmative instrument). Together with an explanantory memorandum from Wales Office. Approved by Parliament. Made 14 December 2006 (SI 2006/3334) .Coming into force 15 December 2006
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer for what purposes mid-year population estimates are used other than for local government finance.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer for what purposes mid-year population estimates are used other than for local government finance.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which local authorities have been identified by the Office for National Statistics as being affected by flawed population statistics.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which local authorities have been identified by the Office for National Statistics as being affected by flawed population statistics.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what representations she has received on population density in the Thames Gateway area.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what representations she has received on population density in the Thames Gateway area.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many and what percentage of people in the UK lived in (a) rural and (b) urban areas in each year since 1997; and what estimates have been made for each year to 2020.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many and what percentage of people in the UK lived in (a) rural and (b) urban areas in each year since 1997; and what estimates have been made for each year to 2020.
| Number and percentage of people who (i) live in settlements with a usually resident population of 10,000 or more and (ii) live either in settlements of under 10,000 people or do not live in a settlement i.e. the remainder, United Kingdom, April 2001 | |||||
| People living in settlements with 10,000 people or more | People living outside settlements of 10,000 people or more | ||||
| Area | All people | Number | Percentage | Percentage | Percentage |
| United Kingdom | 58,789,194 | 45,938,430 | 78.14 | 12,850,764 | 21.86 |
| England | 49,138,831 | 39,631,606 | 80.65 | 9,507,225 | 19.35 |
| Wales | 2,903,085 | 1,865,989 | 64.28 | 1,037,096 | 35.72 |
| Scotland | 5,062,011 | 3,446,036 | 68.08 | 1,615,975 | 31.92 |
| Northern Ireland | 1,685,267 | 994,799 | 59.03 | 690,468 | 40.97 |
| Notes: | |||||
| In England and Wales, settlements with 10,000 or more people are defined as urban and settlements with less than 10,000 people are defined as rural. | |||||
| Source: | |||||
| Table KS01 in the Census 2001 Rural and Urban Classification 2004, Table KS01 from Scotland’s Census 2001 Key Statistics for Settlements and Localities Scotland and Table KS01 on the Census 2001 Key Statistics for Settlements Report |