Skip to main content

1-20 of 28 results for subject:Protectionism

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Next week, the Treasury will publish a paper on the benefits of open markets for Europe and for a Europe that rejects protectionism. At the meeting of European Finance Ministers in Vienna, we will propose that all energy and other sectors that fail to liberalise and open up to competition in the European Union be subject to independent investigation and enforcement.
Answered by
Gordon Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
444 c1036
House
House of Commons
Progress has been made in every country. Reforms are taking place in France, which is experiencing a reaction to them at the moment, and they have also taken place in Germany and Spain. It is true that, in particular, our employment record is one of the best in Europe on the Lisbon scorecard, and we will keep it that way. If I may say so, the reason why we have a good employment record is the combination of the policies that we have pursued for economic stability and the introduction of the new deal, which has helped people who are unemployed and who are without skills to get back into work. Even now, the Opposition should reconsider their opposition to the new deal and support a measure that has given more than 1 million people the chance of jobs in our country.
Answered by
Gordon Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
444 c1037
House
House of Commons
I agree with the hon. Gentleman, who has spoken about those issues in the past. It is completely unacceptable that British industries should play by the rules while industries in other countries do not play by the rules of the single market. It is essential that we send out a message that beggar-my-neighbour policies, protectionist policies and the restriction of competition are damaging both to the consumer and to industrial growth right across the European Union. Indeed, if we fail to get a world trade agreement, such practices will damage industrial growth right across the world, which is why we are proposing a different course of action. In the past, we have had meetings to set timetables on liberalising the energy sectors by this date, the utilities sector by that date, the telecommunications sector by another date and the services sector by a further date. Instead of simply relying on people honouring promises that have been made at such meetings, a mechanism should be implemented so that the European Union itself, perhaps through an independent competition authority separate from the European Commission, investigates sector by sector what is going on and who is restricting competition. Such an authority should have enforcement powers to deal with restrictions on competition, so that we can open up trade across the single market and influence world trade talks, where the damage that will be done by a return to protectionist policies for both developed and developing countries is something that we cannot accept.
Answered by
Gordon Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
444 c1036-7
House
House of Commons
My right hon. Friend must be delighted by the results of the Lisbon scorecard published by the Centre for European Reform, which shows Britain as one of the best performing economies in Europe as far as those benchmarks are concerned. Is he confident, however, that the rest of our partners have learned the lessons set out in the Kok report?
Asked by
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
444 c1037
House
House of Commons
I congratulate the United Kingdom on the way in which it has liberalised its market. We believe in fair and free competition, and the problem lies with a number of countries within the European Union, not least Italy and France. When will the system allow immediate action to be taken against those countries that are not liberalising and that are protecting their industries, particularly in energy, to our disadvantage?
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
444 c1036-7
House
House of Commons
I am grateful to my hon. Friend, who has pointed out the direct effect of the lack of competition in European markets on consumer prices for people throughout the United Kingdom. The cost to us of not having a fully liberalised gas market is about £10 billion a year, which forces up consumer gas prices and means that pensioners and others face higher energy bills. That is why the European Union must now reject protectionism and move towards a far more open market for energy, for financial services, for telecommunications and for utilities, which is why we are now advocating a different course of action. Instead of just reaching political agreements about timetables for liberalisation, a process should be set up in Europe so that those sectors that fail to liberalise and open up to competition are subject to investigations on behalf of consumers and then to new enforcement mechanisms. That would end the practice of economic patriotism, which is against the interests of consumers right across the European Union.
Answered by
Gordon Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
444 c1036
House
House of Commons
Does my right hon. Friend agree that the incomplete liberalisation of European energy markets has been a major factor in recent high gas prices? Will he put pressure on other European countries that have failed to open up their markets, so that we can get prices down for hard-working families facing higher bills after the last, coldest months of the year?
Asked by
Lord Austin of Dudley (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
444 c1036
House
House of Commons
If he will make a statement on progress towards the European single market. [62330]
Asked by
Lord Austin of Dudley (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
444 c1036; 62330
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what response he made to the proposal from the Italian Finance Minister that he support a statement condemning economic nationalism and protectionism.

Asked by
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2006
Reference
62078; 444 c972W;444 c972W
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the prospects of achieving a fair and poisitve outcome in the forthcoming World Trade Organisation round in Hong Kong. Motion withdrawn. (Debated with Lords motion to take note of the report of the European Union Committee on the World Trade Organisation: Hong...

Lead member
Lord Brennan
Answering member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Department
Department of Trade and Industry; European Union Committee
Type
Debates; Debates on select committee reports
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c307-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister sits down perhaps I could follow a line of questioning taken by the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, about joined-up government. Many of the proposals that the Minister has mentioned, for example, about transitional assistance and special and differential treatment, we expect to come out in Hong...

Member
Earl of Sandwich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c339
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to take part in this debate today. I thank my noble friend Lord Brennan for raising this issue at such a critical time. The next major milestone in the DDA—the Hong Kong ministerial conference—is less than two weeks away. I also thank my noble friend Lord Radice for...

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c334-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Brennan, on initiating this debate, which comes on the eve of the Hong Kong round, and also on introducing it so well. It has also been helpful to your Lordships that the European Committee’s report in anticipation of the Hong Kong ministerial meeting has...

Member
Baroness Miller of Hendon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c331-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this year has seen very welcome attention from the media and the public for international development issues. The noble Lords, Lord Brennan and Lord Radice, are certainly sailing with the wind in bringing these important issues to our attention this morning. We are all in favour of making poverty...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c328-31
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who contributed to this debate and, in particular, I thank my noble friend Lord Radice for his timely report. The main theme of our debate has reflected sensible realism rather than undue pessimism. In conclusion, there are three things that are significant for us as...

Member
Lord Brennan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c339-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a case in which government is very well joined up. Your Lordships have seen that the trade negotiations are handled by a linked position, which is partly the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and partly the DTI, and it also brings in the Department for International Development....

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c339
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join in thanking both my noble friends who have brought this matter before us today, and I am fortunate that I am following my noble friend Lord Judd. I am perhaps taking a slightly different view from that which some noble Lords have expressed. I recommend that some stock is taken of...

Member
Lord Christopher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c327-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak as a member of Sub-Committee A, and as one who participated in the preparation of the report published by that committee 18 months ago on the WTO and the role of the EU post-Cancun. That report arose from the atmosphere of gloom following the collapse of the Cancun...

Member
Lord Cobbold (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c324-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friends Lord Brennan and Lord Radice are to be thanked for having so convincingly brought this vital issue before the House. I should declare an interest at the outset as a former director of Oxfam. In such organisations, it is our front-line experience of the grinding poverty...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c325-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very pleased to follow the noble Earl. He sought to emphasise an element that we may have passed by this morning—the contribution of the NGOs. On occasion they have a tendency to present themselves in a way where the best becomes the enemy of the good. None...

Member
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2005
Reference
676 c319-21
House
House of Lords