Skip to main content

1-20 of 149 results for subject:Shops

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many President of the Regimental Institute shops operate at military bases in the UK; and how many are run by commercial businesses.

Asked by
Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c1489W; 100308
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what guidance his Department issues to commanding officers on (a) the appointment of external commercial businesses to run President of the Regimental Institute shops, (b) permissible profit margins of such shops, (c) the overhead costs which such businesses should pay and (d)...

Asked by
Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c1489W; 100309
House
House of Commons

That this House considers accessibility to shops for the disabled to be an essential human right as recognised in law by the Disability Discrimination Act; welcomes the work of the local shop accessibility campaigning group Aspire in Chesterfield to achieve this in reality; recognises the support of the disability charity...

Primary sponsor
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
23 October 2006
Reference
2833
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I think it was the late, lamented Linda Smith who said that you can’t take ASBOs away from people—it’s the only qualification some of them are going to get. I can see that the DBO comes into that category. It is poor in principle that the Government confuse...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c539
House
House of Lords

moved AmendmentNo. 1: Page 1, line 10, leave out ““or disorderly”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, to the select few who remain, I hope to be forgiven if I remind your Lordships of something of the background to drinking banning orders and the basic objection in principle we have...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c536-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Bill is of such moment to the Government that it began a year ago last summer in another place and is now staggering towards its conclusion. We support measures to give the courts more effective powers to ban individuals from licensed premises if that will materially improve...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c537-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for her very constructive introduction to business this afternoon. Her use of the word ““staggering”” towards a conclusion on this Bill was probably an inadvertent pun relating to the matters in hand. We like to think that we are moving...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c538-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I should talk to the noble Lord, Lord Bach, about that, or a drinking banning order—but no! The noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, is right that he will not be able to persuade me, and for good reason. Noble Lords will have heard similar arguments put...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c544
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is another issue on which we will not agree. The policy of my party is to protect young people, and that is what has led to the next amendments that I will move. I am sorry that there is a breach of that principle by these clauses....

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c545
House
House of Lords

moved AmendmentNo. 4: Page 3, line 29, leave out ““16”” and insert ““18”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I apologise to your Lordships for rising to my feet so much on this matter. We are concerned that applications can be made for individuals who are aged 16 or over....

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c543-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if a court has to consider, some guidance ought to be given about how it should consider. I think that this is necessary. I would have supported the first amendments but I was engaged by the noble Lord, Lord Bach, outside the Chamber.

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c544
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that I can reassure the noble Lord and I shall take a little time dealing with his amendment for that very purpose. The amendment would introduce further safeguards to the process of making a drinking banning order. It would mean that any court considering making an...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c541-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the very full reply which the Minister has put forward to meet our concerns about the vulnerability of people who might be subjected to drinking banning orders. He has rightly covered the position of drug users and rough sleepers. It seems to me that...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c543
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad to hear that guidance is to be given to magistrates and the county courts on the circumstances in which an order such as this would be made. In the light of that assurance, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c540
House
House of Lords

moved AmendmentNo. 3: Page 2, line 20, at end insert- ““(4A) Before making a drinking banning order, a court must receive a report from an appropriate officer about the proposed subject of the order, which contains information about the subject and, in particular, about whether there is any reason to...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c540-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment seeks to tighten the prohibitions that can be imposed by a drinking banning order. The same amendment was proposed in Committee. Clause 1(3) states that prohibitions by such an order must include such prohibition as the court making it considers necessary on the subject entering licensed...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c540
House
House of Lords

moved AmendmentNo. 2: Page 2, line 2, after ““considers”” insert ““appropriate and”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, Clause 1(3) states: "““The prohibitions imposed by such an order must include such prohibition as the court making it considers necessary, for ""that purpose, on the subject’s entering…premises in respect of which...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c539-40
House
House of Lords

Violent Crime Reduction Bill. Lords Report stage. Part 1 of 3 records.

Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c536-66
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we had a similar debate only last week in your Lordships’ House when we discussed the Police and Justice Bill. We did not have the benefit of the historical discourse given by the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, which I am sure we all found enlivening and,...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c546-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps the Minister will help me with a matter of interpretation. Under Clause 4(4), as regards, "““an individual who is not a party…engaged in criminal or disorderly conduct””," disorderly conduct cannot be criminal, as a matter of interpretation. Therefore, you are concerned with a person who has been...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2006
Reference
685 c547
House
House of Lords