Skip to main content

1-20 of 117 results for subject:Woolwich

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Much as I would like to, I cannot become Secretary of State for another three years. If the Secretary of State wants to leave office tomorrow, I will take the decision, but the person to whom the hon. Lady should be addressing her question is the Secretary of State. If...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c235
House
House of Commons

I know that.

Member
Gwyneth Dunwoody (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c235
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman not recognise that, as I said earlier, project costs were discussed when the Bill was deposited, and value engineering work has been taken forward? Following the conclusion of the Lyons review at the turn of this year, there will be further discussions on the alternative funding...

Member
Douglas Alexander (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c235
House
House of Commons

I take it that that is a ““maybe””, Mr. Deputy Speaker. We do not know what the Government’s funding intentions really are. As of today, there is no money set aside in the Department for Transport’s budget to pay for Crossrail, so we are debating a Bill to set up...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c235
House
House of Commons

I am puzzled, as I am sure that my hon. Friend is, by all this talk of Sir Michael Lyons. At a meeting that I attended with Sir Michael a few months ago, he expressed genuine bemusement at these references to the Lyons report. He does not intend to make...

Member
Lord Pickles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c235
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. I have said all along that I fear that the Crossrail Bill is a confidence trick on the part of this Government. They are seeing this process through and putting the Bill into law, for whatever political reasons; but unless and until I see from...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c235-6
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend think that there might be some connection here with the fact that the Secretary of State represents not one of his own Paisley and Renfrewshire, South constituents on a single transport matter, as is the case with every other Scottish MP? I should also point out...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c236
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend not concerned that by 2008 a major infrastructure project for the Olympics will also be under way? Has any consideration been given to where the resources will come from to start Crossrail in 2008?

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c236
House
House of Commons

I should be disappointed if we were not capable of undertaking a number of major projects at once. Clearly, there is an issue in respect of the Stratford area, and it might be necessary, because of the Olympics, to build Crossrail in stages. However, there is a problem that the...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c236-7
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman confirm that during the 1990s it was his party in government that introduced a Crossrail Bill but failed dramatically to bring it through the House to fruition?

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c237
House
House of Commons

Let me remind the hon. Gentleman that it was his party that announced and then scrapped the modernisation of the east coast main line, announced and then scrapped most of 25 light rail schemes, announced and has not gone ahead with either Crossrail or Thameslink and produced in its 10-year...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c237
House
House of Commons

It is touching of the hon. Gentleman to make it clear that in government he would be prepared to find the resources to fund such an incredibly expensive project. Will he remind the House how many hundreds of millions of pounds he and his party were committed to stripping out...

Member
Martin Salter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c237
House
House of Commons

You are absolutely right, Mr. Deputy Speaker. We support the Bill, and as the months go by, I look forward to hearing from the Secretary of State whether he intends to fund Crossrail, and what he intends to do about funding it. We wish the Bill well; it will have...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c238
House
House of Commons

I draw attention to my registered interest as chairman of the Construction Industry Council. Crossrail is a scheme of huge importance to the future of our capital city and, indeed, to the UK economy as a whole. We are all familiar with the traffic and transport problems that already exist...

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c238-9
House
House of Commons

But may I remind the right hon. Gentleman that it was my party in government that introduced Britain’s first light rail scheme in half a century, which has now been extended to his constituency—

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c238
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is making a powerful case for Woolwich, which is in his constituency, and I entirely endorse what he says. However, given that in recent years the DLR has linked up with Woolwich, does he not feel that there will be sufficient links to the main London...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c239
House
House of Commons

No; the two lines serve completely different purposes, which can be illustrated by the travel times. The journey from Woolwich to Canary Wharf on the DLR—when it actually comes to Woolwich—will be about half an hour, due to the route, while the time on the direct link via Crossrail would...

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c239-41
House
House of Commons

Absolutely.

Member
Tony Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c259
House
House of Commons

I hear that assurance again from the Front Bench. Of course, when a Whip tells me that something is a mere coincidence, who am I to question that judgment?

Member
Peter Soulsby (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c259
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is reinforcing the argument against 90-day detention. Those poor MPs were stuck in a Committee Room and not told what they were charged with for 60 days, by the sound of it, before they were let out.

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
451 c259
House
House of Commons