Skip to main content

1-20 of 734 results for subject:Archaeology

Session X
2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My hon. Friend makes a very strong case for the gold going to Tamworth, but the British Museum is concerned to ensure that it remains in the west midlands and available for people to see, if not use.
Answered by
Gordon Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
499 c249
House
House of Commons
I met Corporal Steven Boote in Aldershot shortly before he deployed with the Royal Military Police, together with two of his colleagues. Yesterday I received an e-mail from one of those colleagues, in which he expressed his devastation at the loss of his colleague Corporal Boote, but also said, ““We are winning in the job we are doing out here.”” Will the Prime Minister please ensure that he and his Government get that positive message across to the media and the British people about what our fantastic troops are doing out in the field as we speak?
Asked by
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
499 c249
House
House of Commons
My right hon. Friend will be aware of the recent discovery in Staffordshire of the largest collection of Anglo-Saxon gold ever found. Will he give his backing to a plan to create in the region a Saxon tourist trail and support the Tamworth Herald campaign to bring this gold to be displayed in the ancient Saxon capital of the kingdom of Mercia—the town of Tamworth?
Asked by
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
499 c249
House
House of Commons
I say and say again that we are so proud of the work that our troops do in Afghanistan—they are committed; they are brave; they are utterly professional. What we have to do is show people, first, why we are in Afghanistan—that there is a chain of terror that comes from the Pakistan-Afghan mountains that could threaten the streets of London. Then we have to show people that, with the great commitment, energy and expertise of our armed forces, we have a plan to ensure that the Afghans can take more control of their own affairs, so that over time our troops can come home. I applaud the extreme bravery of every member of our armed forces in Afghanistan, particularly in the most difficult circumstances, where three quarters of deaths are due to explosive devices.
Answered by
Gordon Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
499 c249
House
House of Commons
Asked by
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Notes
Lead question not printed
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
499 c249; 299030
House
House of Commons

Amendment 72 72: After Clause 20, insert the following new Clause— "Cremation (1) Where two doctors have to sign the medical certificate to allow cremation of the body or of human remains, both doctors shall retain a copy of the certificate for a minimum of 15 years, and shall supply...

Member
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1521
House
House of Lords

That is my understanding.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1554
House
House of Lords

Clause 25: Powers of senior coroners Amendment 86 86: Clause 25, page 15, line 31, at end insert "and the Coroner for Treasure" Amendment 86 agreed. Clause 25, as amended, agreed.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1556
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for his full reply. I must begin by saying that I am not totally reassured, and I believe that this is something that we need to continue to discuss and came back to on Report. I am also grateful to all noble Lords who...

Member
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1475-7
House
House of Lords

Clause 22 agreed. Schedule 2 agreed. Clause 23 agreed. Schedule 3: Appointment etc of senior coroners, area coroners and assistant coroners Amendment 75 75: Schedule 3, page 121, line 3, leave out "and"

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1548
House
House of Lords

This comes much later.

Member
Lord Walton of Detchant (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1500
House
House of Lords

I take the noble Lord’s point, and it will no doubt form part of the discussion we will enjoy between now and Report. As to the second part of Amendment 74, my noble friend Lord Howarth dealt with it successfully. The bespoke duty to deliver objects is no longer necessary,...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1532-3
House
House of Lords

I support in particular the first of the two amendments, although I support both. It is important that the coroner in charge of a particular area who will know the local people and lawyers should have a say in who should effectively be one of his deputies. The current system...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1548-9
House
House of Lords

I must thank my noble and learned friend Lady Butler-Sloss for the compliment that she paid to my professional group. I have an amendment in this group, Amendment 110. It was tabled after some discussion with INQUEST, which feels that the Chief Coroner should be a high court judge. I...

Member
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1549
House
House of Lords

In moving Amendment 75 I will speak also to Amendments 76 and 77. Amendments 75 and 76 belong together. They amend Schedule 3, which details the appointment of coroners. In particular, paragraph 2 allows the Lord Chancellor to appoint assistant coroners for an area. Before doing so, he must consult...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1548
House
House of Lords

This is another amendment that owes its inspiration to Dr Brian Iddon, who tabled it in a debate in Committee on the Bill in another place. Clause 24 states that the relevant authority must secure the provision of whatever staff are needed by the coroner to carry out his functions....

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1553
House
House of Lords

This amendment seeks to ensure that coroners’ officers and other staff are available outside normal working hours. Clause 24 already states that staff must be available to enable a coroner to carry out their functions. To do this, coroners must ensure that either they or a member of their staff...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1553
House
House of Lords

I appreciate the Minister’s response. However, I suggest that the Government consider that a duplicate should be kept by the doctor who has signed the certificate to form part of his or her appraisal process and appraisal folder, as the way they have filled out these certificates and undertaken examinations...

Member
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1522
House
House of Lords

Clause 21: Investigations concerning treasure Debate on whether Clause 21 should stand part of the Bill. I oppose Clause 21 standing part of the Bill. The investigation of treasure finds is a small but historic part of a coroner’s responsibilities, dating back to the 13th century. It is carried out...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1522-4
House
House of Lords

I rise to speak to Amendment 74 standing in my name and that of the noble Lord, Lord Howarth of Newport. I welcome seeing so many members of the All-Party Parliamentary Archaeology Group present. This issue is of particular concern to the archaeological community. It would be churlish of me...

Member
Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c1524-5
House
House of Lords