Skip to main content

1-20 of 179 results for subject:Software

Session X
2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

On that point, can my right hon. Friend see a difference between the official Opposition's policy on biometric passports and the data that would need to be kept on those, and their view on the subject of identity cards? From what my right hon. Friend has just said, it seems...

Member
Martin Linton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c773
House
House of Commons

The key point about the national identity register is the access that other agencies will eventually have to it. That is why the database becomes a tool that is much more than just a static record of people who have applied for a passport. Clearly, it is normal for a...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c777
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with the hon. Gentleman, with whom I had the pleasure of serving on a Finance Bill Committee a number of years ago. I can certainly testify that his figures on the issue are a good deal more credible than those that we have been offered by Treasury...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c775
House
House of Commons

It does indeed speak volumes, but then very few positive reasons for the scheme remain. One reason why I was taken aback by the reports at the weekend was that I thought that the new Home Secretary had realised that and was trying to scrap the scheme outright. I was...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c759-60
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That this House believes the Government's identity cards scheme should be cancelled immediately." May I begin my remarks with an apology to the Home Secretary? When he made his statement about identity cards last week, I joked with him that his announcement was a fudge arranged between...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c757-8
House
House of Commons

I understand that point. The issue for me, with the various different views coming out of the Government, is that we have a total lack of strategy. The Government have forgotten what the scheme is all about and they do not seem able to explain its purpose. We have something...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c760
House
House of Commons

It is not the fact that Ministers have made different statements at different times that concerns some of us: it is the fact that we now have a scheme that will be compulsory for some people who are resident in this country and voluntary for others. It is the two-tier...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c760
House
House of Commons

Can the hon. Gentleman explain to the House what the Conservative party intends to do to tighten up controls on foreign nations who work and live in this country, if it does not go forward with an ID scheme?

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c760
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman says that he has consistently voted against these proposals. Will he cast his mind back to 23 January 2002, when he voted in favour of my proposal to introduce ID cards?

Member
Nick Palmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c758
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. Of course, if we had a proper border police force in this country—that is what we need—the problem would not arise in the first place because we would intercept those illegal immigrants at the border. We were told that with the card, nobody...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c758
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a very good point. Does he agree that it was always absurd to suppose that an illegal immigrant coming into this country would somehow escape all passport checks but would suddenly be caught out by a check on an ID card? It is completely unnecessary,...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c758
House
House of Commons

I will certainly do that, but the hon. Gentleman will have to be patient for a while. I am going through the policy in chronological order. In 2002, the hon. Member for Epsom and Ewell supported identity cards. In December 2004, the then leader of the Conservative party supported identity...

Member
Alan Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c766
House
House of Commons

My view is that we should do the minimum that we have to do. If data are submitted for a passport application, they will probably be retained in the passport database. We do not need to create a gargantuan list of items with biometric data attached. We do not need...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c763
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has just said that the identity card is about the safety of the British people, but one of the problems with the scheme is that it has become the panacea for all the Government's problems, from benefit fraud to terrorism. Will he set out clearly what...

Member
Mike Weir (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c766
House
House of Commons

I beg to move an amendment, to leave out from "House" to the end of the Question and add:""acknowledges the continued and growing problem of identity fraud in the UK; accepts that a universally accepted biometric passport or identity card linked to a national identity register will help secure the...

Member
Alan Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c765-6
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that the hon. Gentleman is talking complete nonsense. He needs to go back and read the Identity Cards Act 2006 and look at the difference between the two schemes, one of which is a vast collection of personal data, as opposed to a limited amount of information...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c764-5
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is very generous in giving way. But there we have it, do we not? The hon. Member for Lancaster and Wyre (Mr. Wallace) has identified the only difference between the passport register and the national identity register: the passport register is kept up to date when people...

Member
Martin Linton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c764
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. On many occasions over the years, we have seen the Government introduce something that develops mission creep. Step by step, something that was designed for a particular purpose becomes much more substantial. We are talking about the need to have a database for passports...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c764
House
House of Commons

Is it not the case that the fundamental difference is that the biometric passport database is a static database—one submits one's details, they are held there and they are effectively used as verification when one applies to update one's details—whereas the national identity register is a live database? It is...

Member
Ben Wallace (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c764
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. He is also right to point out the Government's lamentable record of managing data. The hon. Member for Broxtowe (Dr. Palmer) asked why the Opposition have formed the view that we have. We have formed that view for two reasons. First, there are...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
495 c764
House
House of Commons