Skip to main content

1-20 of 699 results for subject:Administration

Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business, Innovation and Skills Committee
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
HC 347 2009-10
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
HC 522 2009-10
House
House of Commons
Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Department
Treasury
Type
Government bills
Notes
Royal assent received.
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
Bill 100 2009-10
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
HC 513 2009-10
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the estimated cost to (a) local authorities, (b) the Valuation Office Agency, and (c) the Exchequer, of administering and enforcing the new arrangements for business rates on firms in ports, including the cost of the deferment scheme.

Asked by
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
2976; 718 c357-8WA
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Work and Pensions Committee
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
HC 523 2009-10
House
House of Commons

SI 2010/992. With an explanatory memorandum from the Treasury. Coming into force 16 April 2010.

Department
Revenue and Customs
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
26 March 2010
Reference
SI 2010/992
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
22 March 2010
Reference
HC 325 2009-10
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion that this House has considered the matter of the Intelligence and Security Committee annual report (Cm 7807) and the government's response (Cm 7808).

Lead member
Kim Howells
Answering member
David Miliband
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Debates
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c990-1074
House
House of Commons
Type
Command papers
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
Cm 6864
House
House of Commons

That is one of the issues that everybody has wanted to look at, but my experience of the telecommunications industry is that those involved want to be as helpful and supportive as they possibly can; obviously, they often have commercial strictures and intellectual property issues that they want to address....

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1070-1
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister share my concern that one of the barriers to progress in this area has been the reluctance of the telecommunications industry to engage properly in the process?

Member
Mark Oaten (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1070
House
House of Commons

The Minister is letting election fever get the better of him. Our position is that we are strongly inclined in favour of a judge-led inquiry, but we know that, first, there are possible legal proceedings that would affect, or probably affect, the timing of any such inquiry; and secondly, if...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1069
House
House of Commons

The doyen.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1063
House
House of Commons

The Minister says the doyen, but I suppose he is more continentally minded than I am. Above all, I pay tribute to the ISC's Chairman, the right hon. Member for Pontypridd (Dr. Howells). Listening to the tributes during today's debate, he must have at times feared that he was in...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1063-7
House
House of Commons

I add my salute to members of the Intelligence and Security Committee and, in particular, to the four members who have announced that they intend to leave the House at the forthcoming general election: the hon. Member for Wirral, South (Ben Chapman); my right hon. and learned Friend the Member...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1063
House
House of Commons

I have not got a problem with a judge-led inquiry, if it is designed to try to reassure the public that we have now got all the facts out, but I certainly do not agree that either the ISC or Ministers lacked the means of getting to the truth at...

Member
Kim Howells (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1061-2
House
House of Commons

We must make sure that we get this point right. As my hon. Friend says, neither the ISC nor the Government got to the truth about Diego Garcia initially. Both we and the Government asked questions of the United States Government, who are in control there. They who gave us...

Member
Michael Mates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1061
House
House of Commons

Did I mishear the hon. Gentleman, or did he say that Ministers and members of the Intelligence and Security Committee had not been telling the truth?

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1061
House
House of Commons

No, I did not say that. I said that they had not been able to get to the truth. For example, I consider it indisputable that Ministers were unable to get to the truth when I was given blanket denials on the issue of Diego Garcia. For whatever reason, they...

Member
Lord Tyrie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c1061
House
House of Commons