Skip to main content

1-20 of 157 results for subject:Fares

Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Draft National Assembly for Wales (Legislative Competence) (Transport) Order 2010. Considered by Delegated Legislation Committee. Agreed to on question.

Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
6th DLC
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what estimate he has made of the annual percentage change to the cost of travelling by rail in each year since 2000.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2010
Reference
508 c442-3W; 318468
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what recent progress has been made on the provision of through tickets; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
508 c319W; 323600
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what recent assessment he has made of the availability of oyster cards at mainline stations; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c180W; 323599
House
House of Commons
We require National Rail Enquiries and train operators running ticket offices to provide to the public accurate and impartial information on timetables, train running and fares. Both do so with a high degree of accuracy—98.4 per cent. and 99.3 per cent. respectively in the most recent tests to check the accuracy of responses.
Answered by
Chris Mole (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c961
House
House of Commons
I am surprised at the Minister's figures. Will he not accept that the information available online is still inconsistent, confusing, inadequate and based on the interests of train operators? Do we not need, and will he take action that requires the industry to provide, a simple system based on the needs and interests of travellers?
Asked by
Alun Michael (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c962
House
House of Commons
My right hon. Friend is entirely right to draw attention to the fact that 86 per cent. of inquiries to NRE come from the internet. The ticketing and settling agreement requires train operators to retail accurately and impartially. The journey planning engine, the key mechanism behind the internet site, ensures that the customer can see the cheapest walk-up fare for the times in which they are interested; and the cheapest fare finder facility checks for all the best offers on any particular route. We are working with Passenger Focus and National Rail Enquiries to improve the quality of information so that it shows general explanations of ticket validities—in other words, when off-peak and super off-peak fares are valid.
Answered by
Chris Mole (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c962
House
House of Commons
In answer to an earlier question, the Under-Secretary of State for Transport, my hon. Friend the Member for Ipswich (Chris Mole), spoke about the improved information for passengers about the best fares that are available to them. Does he not agree, however, that providing the best possible fare ought to be an absolute obligation on train operating companies and a condition of their franchise, in order to ensure that passengers always get the best and lowest fare available?
Asked by
Peter Soulsby (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c962-3
House
House of Commons
If he will take steps to ensure that members of the public have access to accurate information on rail fares to enable them to decide which tickets to purchase.
Asked by
Alun Michael (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
507 c961; 322764
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what the (a) open full, (b) average and (c) lowest advance purchase fare available to the general public was for rail travel between York and London in (i) 1996-97 and (ii) the latest period for which figures are available, expressed in...

Asked by
Hugh Bayley (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2010
Reference
507 c862W; 322098
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what estimate he has made of the effect on the cost of off-peak rail travel in the London borough of Bexley of the implementation of the Oyster pay-as-you-go agreement.

Asked by
David Evennett (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2010
Reference
507 c862W; 322453
House
House of Commons

Draft Concessionary Bus Travel Act 2007 (Variation of Reimbursement and Other Administrative Arrangements) Order 2010. Considered by Delegated Legislation Committee. Agreed to on question.

Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
4th DLC
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for this opportunity to place on the official record something that has been the subject of a huge amount of correspondence and a lot of comment in other debates in the House. Before I start, it is also worth placing on the record that I intend to...

Member
Roger Gale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c100-2WH
House
House of Commons

The high-speed train services have been amazing and transformative in my constituency, but, of course, the normal trains are slow, dirty and very often late. Would the hon. Gentleman agree that there is an urgent need for bi-directional signalling at the pinch point at Rochester bridge? In my own constituency...

Member
Adam Holloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c102WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Some of the changes dramatically affect his constituents. If he can stay until later in my speech, he will hear me refer to one of them. If he cannot, I understand fully, as I know that he has other commitments in the House this...

Member
Roger Gale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c104-6WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is leading me down a path that I was not going to go down, but he has given me the opportunity to comment on an issue that is not peripheral but separate. Five years ago, representatives of Network Rail came down to Margate and examined the potential...

Member
Roger Gale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c102-3WH
House
House of Commons

I am most grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way while making a powerful speech, and I congratulate him on fighting a remarkable campaign. May I add one more item to that extremely unappealing list? Those who commute across Kent rather than into London face a pathetic collapse in...

Member
Julian Brazier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c103-4WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has his views—others beg to differ. It is important to recognise that introducing these services has significantly reduced journey times to several parts of Kent and, while the hon. Gentleman has made the argument that journey time-savings for his constituents are not significant, the Department feels that...

Member
Chris Mole (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c121-3WH
House
House of Commons

We are going to be told later, I suspect, that there will be a review and that things might get better at some time. The point is that we raised the issues a year ago and no one listened, so I wonder why the hon. Gentleman thinks they will listen...

Member
Roger Gale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c110WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for North Thanet (Mr. Gale), who might be surprised to hear that I agree with some, but not all, of the points that he raised. I am not here to speak for other MPs' constituents, but I certainly want to speak...

Member
Gwyn Prosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c108-10WH
House
House of Commons