Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,100 results for subject:Peers

Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill. Consideration of Commons message agreeing to Lords amendments and with an amendment to a Lords amendment. Commons amendment agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
718 c1734-5
House
House of Lords

My other comment would be, "Stick like a limpet to the Clerks". Motion agreed.

Member
Lord Trefgarne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
718 c1735
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure that there was such slackness when the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, was chairman of bar at University College, London, Students’ Union more than 40 years ago, and I am sorry that this has slipped into his behaviour. I wait to hear from the noble...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
718 c1735
House
House of Lords

I, too, have sat on the government Front Bench in the sort of role filled by the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, and I have huge sympathy for him. I immediately forgive him for his one and only very modest error. But there is a lesson to be learnt. The difficulty...

Member
Lord Trefgarne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
718 c1735
House
House of Lords

I add my voice to that. I saw the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, getting to his feet and thought, "Where is the noble Lord, Lord Bach, who has been dealing with this Bill?". However, I think that we would all accept the noble Lord’s apology. It is very difficult. Like...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
718 c1735
House
House of Lords

That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment 20A consequential on Lords Amendment 20. That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment 20A consequential on Lords Amendment 20. 20: Clause 57, leave out Clause 57 20A: Page 35, line 4, leave out subsection (3)

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
718 c1734
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the only amendment made in the other place was to delete a redundant cross-reference to the disclaimer of peerage. The provisions to which it originally related are no longer in the Bill, and this consequential amendment removes the reference. It is probably appropriate that I am here to...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
718 c1734-5
House
House of Lords

8: Clause 25, page 14, line 24, at end insert— "( ) The Minister shall normally exercise the power under subsection (1) except in the case of treaties that he deems to be minor, technical or incremental adjustments to existing treaties to which the United Kingdom is a signatory."

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1619
House
House of Lords

151: Schedule 15, page 132, line 15, leave out "In section 62(1)" and insert— "(1) Section 62 (interpretation of Part 6) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (1)" 152: Schedule 15, page 132, line 16, at end insert— "(3) After subsection (2) insert— "(2A) Until the end of the...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1642
House
House of Lords

May I make the point that it would be quite easy to have these photocopied and circulated, as manuscript amendments have been in the past.

Member
Lord Elton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1650
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is deeply regrettable that the opportunity has not been taken to pursue these modest measures that the noble Lord, Lord Steel, has so helpfully tabled on a number of occasions for your Lordships’ consideration. Today, my right honourable friend the Prime Minister said to the country that...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1628-9
House
House of Lords

I was only going to try to help my noble friend Lord Strathclyde because I thought that he and the noble Lord, Lord McNally, might like to know why we do not want the clauses. The answer is that there is not enough time. You cannot alter the constitution in...

Member
Earl Ferrers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1631
House
House of Lords

Before we do that, I register again my acute disappointment that, after three years of debate on what I call running repairs in this House on the four issues, the Government picked up three of those issues in this Bill but, at the last minute, we are not going to...

Member
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1627-8
House
House of Lords

114A: Clause 59, page 34, line 36, leave out paragraph (c)

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1637
House
House of Lords

25: Schedule 7, page 91, line 37, leave out "the House of Commons" and insert "each House of Parliament" 26: Schedule 7, page 93, line 18, at end insert "(subject to sub-paragraph (5)). (5) A statutory instrument containing an order made under this paragraph in consequence only of a scheme...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1626
House
House of Lords

155: After Clause 91, insert the following new Clause— "Prisoner voting rights Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 is omitted."

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1642
House
House of Lords

There you go. I cannot think why the Liberal Democrats cannot keep their mouths shut for half a minute. They want it all to be elected. They do not realise that the House of Commons will hate it or that there will be terrible antagonism between the Lords and the...

Member
Earl Ferrers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1629-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the leave of the Committee, I shall speak also to Amendments 23 to 26. I can be very brief with this group of amendments. They give effect to the conclusions and recommendations made in respect of Part 4 by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee. The...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1625-6
House
House of Lords

23: Schedule 6, page 81, leave out paragraph (b) 24: Schedule 6, page 81, line 21, leave out from "8(2)"" to end of line 23 Amendments 23 and 24 agreed. Schedule 6, as amended, agreed. Clauses 51 and 52 agreed. Schedule 7 : Parliamentary and other pensions Amendments 25 and...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1626
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord Bach, generously said at the beginning of our proceedings on the Bill this evening, my noble friends and I did not agree to the complete exclusion of Part 5, which relates to matters of considerable concern to this House and to issues on...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1626-7
House
House of Lords