Skip to main content

1-20 of 43 results for subject:Physics

Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how much research funding his Department has provided to the (a) Optic Research and Incubation Centre at St Asaph Business Park and (b) members of the Welsh Opto-Electronic Forum in each of the last 10 years; and how...

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1490W; 325392
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of the Optic Research and Incubation Centre at St. Asaph Business Park in the last seven years.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 April 2010
Reference
508 c1555W; 325391
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman said that science was "starved" of funding. However, as the hon. Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon (Dr. Harris) has pointed out, the percentage share of GDP that was invested in science during the years that he mentioned is exactly the same as the percentage share...

Member
Adam Afriyie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c30WH
House
House of Commons

No. Of course, there has been a considerable increase in GDP as well. The figures that I am citing today—for example, the science budget is nearly £4 billion a year now, having been virtually doubled—show that there has been a very substantial increase in investment, and science has benefited from...

Member
Andrew Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c30WH
House
House of Commons

I am really glad that the right hon. Gentleman has raised that issue, because it is entirely in the Government's hands to produce a comprehensive spending review. They have refused to do so and that is what is creating all the uncertainty around the STFC and many of the other...

Member
Adam Afriyie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c30-1WH
House
House of Commons

That is right. What was disappointing about the press release and the announcement is that, in many cases, it was not a long-term solution. I realise that funding for the support of large domestic facilities will be ring-fenced, and that arrangements will be made for other research councils to pay...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c27-9WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful once again to my hon. Friend for giving way. Does he agree that the Minister needs to understand that such questions are important because increased and reduced budgets cannot be easily accommodated in the long-term planning of physics and astronomy? In other words, an increase or a...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c26-7WH
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that we have only to look at the long-term impact of the Apollo space programme in the United States to see how what could be regarded as pure research or the pursuit of scientific goals directly impacts on the capability of the economic sector...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c29-30WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my fellow Oxford MP, the hon. Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon (Dr. Harris), on securing this important debate. Physics is vital to Oxford and Oxfordshire, to science in the UK and to our economy more generally. I, too, thank the Institute of Physics and others who have...

Member
Andrew Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c29WH
House
House of Commons

Yes, indeed. The difficulty of forecasting the economic impact of blue-skies research is something that I will come to later. I share the concerns voiced by the hon. Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon about the pressures facing the Science and Technology Facilities Council in general and physics funding in...

Member
Andrew Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c30WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to have the debate, and I am delighted that there is so much interest in it among parliamentarians and the public, given that we are competing with astronauts and the like at the launch of the new space strategy. Of course, those matters impact on physics...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c23WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing the debate. Does he agree that astronomy, which is the area of greatest interest to me, is financially beleaguered because, despite our having world-class resources and facilities, such as those in Armagh, those concerned are always fighting for what feels like a very...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c23WH
House
House of Commons

I agree. The failure to capitalise on initiatives and drive them through is symptomatic of the problem. There is not money for the here and now, and it becomes difficult to plan for the future. I pay tribute to my hon. Friend for his commitment to astronomy and for his...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c24WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that blue sky research is most important, and that it should not stall under the current difficult economic conditions? The large hadron collider is one such case. We do not know whether it will tell us much about the Higgs boson or what it will...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c24WH
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman, who is greatly missed on the Science and Technology Committee, where he made a unique contribution, and a strongly supportive one in certain areas. I remember him particularly being a great advocate of embryo research. As an engineer he will recognise that it is...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c25-6WH
House
House of Commons

I must challenge those figures. I have never understood why Ministers choose the baseline that they choose when they say that something has risen by, for example, 13 per cent. I often thought that it was random, but now I think I can see that they just choose the lowest...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c43-4WH
House
House of Commons

I have the figures in front of me: first degree entrants in 2002-03, 2,990, and in 2008-09, 3,555; masters programme entrants in 2002-03, 545, and 555 last year; and PhD entrants in 2002-03, 525, and a growth last year to 805. That is a huge increase, on any analysis, so...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c44-5WH
House
House of Commons

We were talking about straightforwardness, honesty and clarity. I am not quite sure that I heard the answer to the question asked by the hon. Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon. Will the Minister confirm that spending on science has only just, in the past year or so, approached the...

Member
Adam Afriyie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c43WH
House
House of Commons

I said that we did not have a Save British Science campaign, which he knows that a past Administration put up with. He also knows—I was coming on to capital—that the budget for higher education capital at the time we came to office was about £75 million. Notwithstanding the savings...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c43WH
House
House of Commons

I would be happy to divert the debate to that subject, but it could take quite some time. To be absolutely clear again, we are committed to a multi-year ring fence for the science budget, with pretty much the same terms under which it currently operates, but we are not...

Member
Adam Afriyie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
508 c40-1WH
House
House of Commons