Skip to main content

1-20 of 83 results for subject:Testing

Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what research his Department has (a) undertaken and (b) evaluated on levels of demand for conducting annual tests of heavy goods vehicles outside standard working hours.

Asked by
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
508 c1164W; 325710
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport how many tests of heavy goods vehicles the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency conducted outside core business hours between April 2009 and February 2010.

Asked by
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
508 c1164W; 325709
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps he plans to take to encourage people to have regular sight tests.

Asked by
David Crausby (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2010
Reference
508 c490W; 323371
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make it his policy to retain the age of eligibility for free NHS sight tests for women at 60 or over when the female state pension age rises above 60.

Asked by
Janet Dean (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c772W; 322000
House
House of Commons

SI 2010/801. With an explanatory memorandum and impact assessment from the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. Coming into force 6 April 2010.

Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
SI 2010/801
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 2010/634. With an explanatory memorandum from the Department of Health. Coming into force 1 April 2010.

Department
Department of Health
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
SI 2010/634
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many safety tests of genetically modified crops and foods, to the highest international standards, they have commissioned in the last 10 years.

Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
2302; 718 c11WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they seek safety testing and other research relating to genetically modified crops from organisations other than corporations that seek commercial approval.

Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
2303; 718 c11WA
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for what he has just said. He knows that I agree with him on the question of human rights in Iran, but can he categorise in which respects, in the Government's view, Iran is in breach of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and, to save my trying...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c346WH
House
House of Commons

On the first question, the International Atomic Energy Agency has made it clear that the Iranians are in breach of the rules in several ways and the treaty that they signed up to. I can write to my hon. Friend with those details. There are questions about their willingness to...

Member
Ivan Lewis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c346-7WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for reiterating his position, which is well known, but he mentioned Iran's human rights record earlier. It is important that we send clear messages about its nuclear weapons programme and try to do that in a unified way, whatever other differences we may legitimately have....

Member
Ivan Lewis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c347-8WH
House
House of Commons

I have no problem whatever answering that question, because I have never supported Iran developing nuclear weapons. I do not support anyone developing nuclear weapons; I have a fundamental moral objection to them. I have made it clear to Iranians whom I have met that, whatever the issues are, I...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c347WH
House
House of Commons

On a point of fact, I believe that I am correct and that the Minister may wish to review what he has said. There is a sub-strategic nuclear role for Trident. The Government's policy, given in the 1998 strategic defence review, is that""The credibility of deterrence also depends on retaining...

Member
John Stanley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c349WH
House
House of Commons

I turn to some of the contributions from hon. Members; I want to do them justice. I realise that I have probably had more time than my Front-Bench colleagues, but I hope that they understand that I have a lot of ground to cover. My hon. Friend the Member for...

Member
Ivan Lewis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c348-9WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman raises a point that is difficult to argue with. It all depends on one's definition of "sub-strategic role", but I do not think that we could disagree on how he defined it in his contribution. The difficulty is in the definition. However, I agree with what...

Member
Ivan Lewis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c349-50WH
House
House of Commons

Let me say very simply that the Opposition share the Minister's belief that it is important that the United Kingdom should be represented at the conference at as high a level as practicable. I welcome his comments about consultation with other political parties.

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c348WH
House
House of Commons

I am happy to help the Minister. I hope that he will then answer the questions that I raised about Trident. We do not believe that there is a case for renewing Trident on a like-for-like basis. I hope that that is clear enough for him.

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c350WH
House
House of Commons

The problem is that we are not clear about the Liberal Democrat position on the replacement of Trident because the party has not said that it will not replace Trident. It has tried to hint to a particular section of the electorate that it is less comfortable with the concept...

Member
Ivan Lewis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c350WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Government publish in advance of the conference any particular strategic document, and will they use the conference to seek parallel meetings with non-NPT states, all of which are normally there at NPT review conferences? I shall be at the latter part of the conference, and I am happy...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c350WH
House
House of Commons

That may be an offer that I can refuse; I am not sure. I am not clear whether we have a commitment to publish our negotiating position formally, but I am happy to ensure that there is engagement with right hon. and hon. Members with an interest in these issues....

Member
Ivan Lewis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c350-1WH
House
House of Commons